Bornstein SR, Dalan R, Hopkins D Endocrine and metabolic link to coronavirus infection. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2020;

Eades CE, Cameron DM, Evans JMM. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.. 2017; 129:173-181

Hallberg SJ, Gershuni VM, Hazbun TL, Athanarayanan SJ. Reversing type 2 diabetes: a narrative review of the evidence. Nutrients.. 2019; 11:(4)

Parliament of Western Australia. Report 6 THE FOOD FIX: the role of diet in type 2 diabetes prevention and management. 2019. (accessed 19 February 2021)

Van-de-l'Isle Y, Steer PJ, Coote IW, Cauldwell M. Impact of changes to national UK Guidance on testing for gestational diabetes screening during a pandemic: a single-centre observational study. BJOG. 2020;

Wagnild JM, Hinshaw K, Pollard TM. Associations of sedentary time and self-reported television time during pregnancy with incident gestational diabetes and plasma glucose levels in women at risk of gestational diabetes in the UK. BMC Public Health.. 2019; 19

Gestational diabetes

02 April 2021
Volume 29 · Issue 4


Revisiting the risks associated with gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy during COVID-19

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension are the commonest comorbidities in patients with SARS-CoV-2, and Bornstein et al (2020) draw attention to emerging evidence for a direct metabolic and endocrine link to the disease process.

Given this context, it is perhaps timely to reconsider gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), defined as glucose intolerance that is first diagnosed in pregnancy; increases the risk of complications for both mother and baby during pregnancy; and has a European prevalence of 5.4%, ranging from 3.8%–7.8% (Eades et al, 2017).

Further, Van-de-l'Isle et al (2020) note that GDM complicates around one in 16 pregnancies in the UK, citing evidence that GDM treatment improves perinatal outcomes: women with untreated GDM have a four-fold risk of having a baby large for gestational age or macrosomia (birthweight >4 000 g) compared with those treated for GDM. Such observations strengthen the need for improved identification of GDM, and Van-de-l'Isle et al (2020) investigated the differences in detection rate for GDM between that recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the testing considered appropriate during the COVID-19 pandemic by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Following RCOG guidance, the overall rate of women identified with GDM fell from 7.7%–4.2%, and of 230 women who tested negative according to the RCOG criteria but who subsequently had an oral glucose tolerance test, 20.4% were diagnosed with GDM according to the NICE criteria. With RCOG COVID-19 GDM screening failing to detect 47 of 82 (57%) women subsequently identified as gestational diabetics, Van-de-l'Isle et al (2020) suggest that RCOG GDM screening ‘cannot be recommended for general use.’

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month