References

Bainbridge J Choices after cesarean. Birth. 2002; 29:(3)203-6

Baxter L, Davies S Balancing risk and choice in childbirth after caesarean section. British Journal of Midwifery. 2010; 18:(10)638-43 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2010.18.10.78836

Cluett ER, Bluff R From Practice to research. In: Cluett ER, Bluff R Edinburgh: Elsevier Ltd; 2006

Critical Skills Appraisal Programme. 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. 2013. http://www.casp-uk.net/#!casp-international/c1zsi/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf (accessed 15 June 2015)

Dahlen HG, Homer CSE Motherbirth or childbirth? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery. 2011; 29:(2)167-73

David S, Fenwick J, Bayes S., Martin T A qualitative analysis of the content of telephone calls made by women to a dedicated ‘Next Birth After Caesarean’ antenatal clinic’. Women Birth. 2010; 23:(4)166-71

Changing Childbirth: Report of the Expert Maternity Group.London: HMSO; 1993

Downe S, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Elsevier Ltd; 2008

Emmett CL, Shaw ARG, Montgomery AA, Murphy DJ Women's experience of decision-making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG. 2006; 113:(12)1438-45

Farnworth A, Pearson PH Choosing mode of delivery after previous caesarean birth. British Journal of Midwifery. 2007; 15:(4)188-94 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2007.15.4.23379

Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y Believing in birth - choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16:(8)1561-70

Fitzpatrick K, Kurinczuk J, Alfirevic Z, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, Knight M Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: A national case-control study. PLoS Med. 2012; 2012

Repeat CS or VBAC? A systematic review of the factors influencing pregnant women's decision-making processes. 2012. https://www.rcm.org.uk/learning-and-career/learning-and-research/ebm-articles/repeat-cs-or-vbac-a-systematic-review-of-the (accessed 15 June 2015)

Fraser DM, Cooper MA The midwife, 15th edn. In: Fraser DM, Cooper MA Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009

Goodall KE, McVittie C, Magill M Birth Choice following primary Caesarean section: mothers' perceptions of the influence if health professionals on decision-making. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2009; 27:(1)4-14

Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115:(6)1267-78

Hamilton A Assisted births, 15th edn. In: Fraser DM, Cooper MA Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009

Hardwick E, Wright A, Ali S Birth after caesarean section - facilitating choic. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;

Homer C, Besley K, Bell J Does continuity of care impact decision-making in the next birth after a caesarean section (VBAC)? A randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13

Knight HE, Gurol-Urganci I, van der Meulen JH Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG. 2014; 121:(2)183-93

Lundgren I, Begley C, Gross MM, Bondas T Groping through the Fog: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12

McGrath P, Phillips E, Vaughan G Vaginal birth after caesarean risk decision - making: Australian findings on the mothers' perspective. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010; 16:(3)274-81

Meakin S Procedures in obstetrics, 14th edn. In: Macdonald S, Magill-Cuerden J Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2012

Meddings F, Phipps FM, Haith-Cooper M, Haigh J Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women's perceptions. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16:(1)160-7

Moffat M, Bell J, Porter M ‘ decision-making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2007; 114:(1)86-93

Quick reference guide: Caesarean section.London: NICE; 2004

Paré E, Quiñones JN, Macones GA Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG. 2006; 113:(1)75-85

Ridley RT, Davis PA, Bright JH, Sinclair D What influences a woman to choose vaginal birth after cesarean?. JOGNN. 2002; 31:(6)665-72

Romano AM, Gerber H, Andrews D Social media, power, and the future of VBAC. J Perinat Ed. 2010; 19:(3)43-52

Birth after previous caesarean birth Green Top 45.London: RCOG; 2007

Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107:(6)1226-32

Thomas J, Paranjothy S National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report.London: RCOG; 2001

Vaginal birth after caesarean or elective caesarean—What factors influence women's decisions?

02 July 2015
13 min read
Volume 23 · Issue 7

Abstract

Background:

Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is a safe option for most women. In the UK, just over 50% of women with a previous caesarean section opt for a VBAC and repeat caesarean is one of the four main causes of the rising caesarean rate. It is therefore important to review the literature in order to explore the factors which influence women's decision-making, which may increase normal birth rates.

Method:

A literature search was conducted using Ovid Online and EBSCOhost database platforms. Primary, qualitative, peer reviewed, English language research papers were assessed according to inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Results:

Nine primary research studies were found. The findings were synthesised into five themes: personal beliefs about birth, previous birth experience, the need for control, health professionals and practical considerations.

Discussion:

The influence of women's beliefs about birth, as well as the attitudes of health professionals were identified as the main factors that influence women's decision-making with regards to VBAC. It is important for practitioners to reflect on their own way of communicating with women about VBAC to increase perceived supportiveness and women's autonomy. Further research is required to better understand the psycho-social aspects of decision-making.

Conclusion:

Knowledge of the identified themes will give health professionals an insight into the inner ‘lived’ experience of women making decisions regarding VBAC, increasing their awareness of their potential influence on a woman's final decision when planning her birth. The factors found may also be able to be applied to other areas of women's decision-making in maternity care.

Improving women's choice and control over their maternity care has been on the political agenda in the UK for over 20 years (Department of Health, 1993). An area where the issue of women's choice is regularly encountered is the choice of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) (Hamilton, 2009). Key midwifery textbooks (Hamilton, 2009; Meakin, 2012) devote only a few paragraphs to VBAC, terming it ‘trial of scar’ and solely discussing success rates and risk factors. Downe (2008) describes this occurrence as the ‘primacy of risk’ in maternity care, with risk being the foremost concern—the main risk of VBAC being uterine rupture (Hamilton, 2009). However, this is a 0.21% risk (Fitzpatrick et al, 2012) and when balanced against the morbidity associated with multiple caesarean sections (Silver et al, 2006), VBAC is considered a safe and valid choice (Guise et al, 2010). Paré et al (2006) discovered that for women who want to give birth to at least two more children, VBAC is associated with better long-term outcomes, recognising the long-term reproductive consequences (including the chance of hysterectomy for uterine rupture and placenta accreta) of multiple caesarean sections.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month