Almendingen K, Šaltyte Benth J, Molin M. Large scale blended learning design in an interprofessional undergraduate course in Norway: context description and supervisors' perspective. MedEdPublish. 2021; 10:(1)

Alrasheed A, Altulahi N, Temsah MH Interprofessional education competition during the COVID-19 pandemic at King Saud University: benefits and challenges. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021; 14:673-679

Biggs JB. From theory to practice: a cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research & Development. 1993; 12:(1)73-85

Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education. Interprofessional education – A definition. 2002. (accessed 8 November 2021)

Freeth D, Reeves S. Learning to work together: using the presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities. J Interprof Care. 2004; 18:(1)43-56

Gonzalez-Pascual JL, Icaran E, Saiz-Navarro EM, Esteban-Gonzalo L, Cardenete-Reyes C, Beunza JJ. Impact of the first interprofessional education undergraduate program in Spain. J Interprof Care. 2018; 32:(3)374-377

Iglesias-Pradas S, Hernández-García Á, Chaparro-Peláez J, Prieto JL. Emergency remote teaching and students' academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;

Jaques D, Salmon G. Learning in groups: a handbook for face-to-face and online environments.Florida: Routledge; 2007

Jones TA, Vidal G, Taylor C. Interprofessional education during the COVID-19 pandemic: finding the good in a bad situation. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020; 34:(5)633-646

Khalili H. Online interprofessional education during and post the COVID-19 pandemic: a commentary. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020; 34:(5)687-690 0.1080/13561820.2020.1792424

Langlois S, Xyrichis A, Daulton BJ The COVID-19 crisis silver lining: interprofessional education to guide future innovation. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020; 34:(5)587-592

Liaw SY, Choo T, Wu LT “Wow, woo, win”: Healthcare students' and facilitators' experiences of interprofessional simulation in three-dimensional virtual world: a qualitative evaluation study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021; 105

Mahajan R, Mohammed CA, Sharma M, Gupta P, Singh T. Interprofessional Education: An Approach to Improve Healthcare Outcomes. Indian Pediatr. 2018; 55:(3)241-249

Nichols A, Trimble P, Stebbings A. The use of inter-professional education (IPE) healthcare law and ethics scenario based learning sessions amongst nursing, midwifery and law students: An evaluation. Nurse Educ Today. 2020; 91

O'Shea MC, Reeves NE, Bialocerkowski A, Cardell E. Using simulation-based learning to provide interprofessional education in diabetes to nutrition and dietetics and exercise physiology students through telehealth. Adv Simul (Lond). 2019; 4

Power A, Sy MP, Hutchings M Learning in lockdown: exploring the impact of COVID-19 on interprofessional education. British Journal of Midwifery. 2021; 29:(11)648-652

Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6

Sani I, Hamza Y, Chedid Y, Amalendran J, Hamza N. Understanding the consequence of COVID-19 on undergraduate medical education: Medical students' perspective. Ann Med Surg. 2020; 58:117-119

Seymour-Walsh AE, Weber A, Bell A. Pedagogical foundations to online lectures in health professions education. Rural Remote Health. 2020; 20:(2)

Singh J, Matthees B. Facilitating interprofessional education in an online environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed method study. Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9:(5)

Tang B, Coret A, Qureshi A, Barron H, Ayala AP, Law M. Online lectures in undergraduate medical education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018; 4:(1)

World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. 2010. (accessed 15 November 2021)

Yamashita T, Osawa S, Ota K Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities. Med Educ Online. 2021; 26:(1)

The impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of interprofessional education: it's not all bad news

02 December 2021
Volume 29 · Issue 12


During the COVID-19 outbreak, most face-to-face teaching and practice-based learning placements were suspended. Universities provided ongoing health and social care education, including interprofessional education, using online technology. Focusing on changes in the delivery of interprofessional education, this second article in a series on interprofessional education provides an international perspective through facilitators' case reports. It considers the key factors that enabled a rapid shift from face-to-face to online interprofessional education, and the key aspects that had to change. The significant changes reported from literature and case reports reflect on remote and online learning, the duration of education sessions, individual and team learning aspects and facilitation skills.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on societies and individuals. Social distancing measures were introduced to stop the spread of the virus and as a result, most levels of teaching and learning transferred from face to face to online. Universities tried to provide ongoing health and social care education through emergency remote teaching while face-to-face teaching and practice-based learning placements were suspended (Sani et al, 2020). This transformation happened unexpectedly and had to be accomplished in a short period of time (Iglesias-Pradas et al, 2021).

As outlined in the first article in this series (Power et al, 2021), interprofessional collaborative practice is essential for providing high-quality, effective healthcare. Globally, universities have introduced interprofessional education for students to learn with, from and about each other to improve quality of care (Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE), 2002; World Health Organization, 2010; Gonzalez-Pascual et al, 2018; Mahajan et al, 2018; Nichols et al, 2020). Like most teaching, the delivery of interprofessional education was affected by the pandemic and the suspension of face-to-face teaching (Langlois et al, 2020). It is valuable to consider how facilitators coped with this shift and ensured the ongoing delivery of interprofessional education. The aim of this second article in the series on interprofessional education is to focus on its delivery during the pandemic. It will provide an international perspective through facilitators' case reports and will reflect on key aspects that had to change, as well as factors that enabled a rapid shift from face-to-face to online interprofessional education. As acknowledged by Khalili (2020), there are challenges and opportunities for interprofessional education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this paper will reflect on the lessons learned and offer recommendations to guide future remote and online interprofessional education.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month