References

Andrews A. Home birth experience 1: decision and expectation. Br J Midwifery. 2004; 12:(8)518-523 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2004.12.8.15283

Barber T, Rogers J, Marsh S. The Birth Place Choices Project: phase one. Br J Midwifery. 2006a; 14:(10)609-613 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2006.14.10.21935

Barber T, Rogers J, Marsh S. The Birth Place Choices Project: phase two initiative. Br J Midwifery. 2006b; 14:(11)671-675 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2006.14.11.22258

Benjamin A. Audit: how to do it in practice. BMJ. 2008; 336:(7655)1241-1245 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39527.628322.AD

Borrelli SE, Walsh D, Spiby H. First-time mothers' choice of birthplace: influencing factors, expectations of the midwife's role and perceived safety. J Adv Nurs. 2017; 73:(8)1937-1946 https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13272

Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011; 343:(7840)

Coxon K, Chisholm A, Malouf R, Rowe R, Hollowell J. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7

Davis DL, Walker K. Case-loading midwifery in New Zealand: making space for childbirth. Midwifery. 2010; 26:(6)603-608 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2009.01.004

Changing Childbirth. Report of the Expert Maternity Group.London: HMSO; 1993

Desmond C, Brubaker K, Ellner A. Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2013; 1:(1)59-70 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F21642850.2013.854706

Hadjigeorgiou E, Kouta C, Papastavrou E, Papadopoulos I, Mårtensson LB. Women's perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review. Midwifery. 2012; 28:(3)380-390 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.05.006

Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Asch DA. Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:(13)1340-1344 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb071595

Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000; 356:(9239)1375-1383 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3

Henshall C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0832-0

Houghton G, Bedwell C, Forsey M, Baker L, Lavender T. Factors influencing choice in birth place — an exploration of the views of women, their partners and professionals. Evid Based Midwifery. 2008; 6:(2)59-64

Homebirth ‘carries higher risk’ for first time mothers. 2011. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-15861280 (accessed 24 January 2018)

Johanson R, Newburn M, Macfarlane A. Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far?. BMJ. 2002; 324:(7342)892-895 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892

Jomeen J. Choice in childbirth: a realistic expectation?. Br J Midwifery. 2007; 15:(8)485-490 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2007.15.8.24388

Kirkham M, Stapleton H NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Informed Choice in Maternity Care: An Evaluation of Evidence Based Leaflets.(eds). york: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of york; 2001

Kotter J, Cohen D. Heart of change.Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press; 2002

Luce A, Cash M, Hundley V, Cheyne H, van Teijlingen E, Angell C. “Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0827-x

Madi BC, Crow R. A qualitative study of information about available options for childbirth venue and pregnant women's preference for a place of delivery. Midwifery. 2003; 19:(4)328-336 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-6138(03)00042-1

McCourt C, Rayment J, Rance S, Sandall J. Organisational strategies and midwives' readiness to provide care for out of hospital births: an analysis from the Birthplace organisational case studies. Midwifery. 2012; 28:(5)636-645 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.004

Moore M, Tjornbo O, Enfors E, Knapp C, Hodbod J, Baggio JA. Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations. Ecology and Society. 2014; 19:(4) https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06966-190454

Principals for Best Practice in Clinical Audit.Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002

Maternity services in England.London: The Stationery Office; 2013

Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England.London: NHS England; 2016

Ogden J, Shaw A, Zander L. Women's experience of having a hospital birth. Br J Midwifery. 1998; 6:(5)339-345 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.1998.6.5.339

Rogers C, Villar R, Harman J. Turning the tide of childbirth: are we still adrift?. Br J Midwifery. 2015; 23:(1)42-49 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2015.23.1.42

The Royal College of Midwives Survey of Midwives' current thinking about home birth.London: RCM; 2011

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwifeled continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub3

Domiciliary midwifery and maternity bed needs.London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1970

Vedam S, Schummers L, Stoll K The Canadian Birth Place Study: describing maternity practice and providers' exposure to home birth. Midwifery. 2012; 28:(5)600-608 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.011

My Place or yours?. 2014. https://www.rcm.org.uk/news-views-and-analysis/analysis/my-place-or-yours (accessed 24 January 2019)

Can a workshop increase pregnant women's knowledge of their birthplace options?

02 March 2019
11 min read
Volume 27 · Issue 3

Abstract

Background

Research shows that women consistently report a lack of adequate, unbiased information about their birthplace choices.

Aim

One midwfery unit aimed to address the issue by creating a workshop to disseminate the findings of Brocklehurst et al's (2011) birthplace study and report local data.

Method

Standards were set at 70% of suitable women being booked to attend. It was aimed that 100% of those women would actually attend, and that 100% would report receiving appropriate and sufficient information.

Findings

Overall, 45.7% of eligible women were booked to attend and 77.7% of those booked did attend. All women who attended reported having received adequate information. The number of birth centre births in the area rose by 31.3% after the implementation of the workshop.

Conclusion

Although attendance could be improved, the authors were confident that the workshop is a positive step in increasing women's knowledge of their birthplace options. Local initiatives must be commended; however, strategies must be implemented on a national level to alter the status quo of hospital births as the safest option for all women.

Planning where to give birth is arguably one of the most significant choices that a woman will make during her pregnancy. Yet for many women, an assumption is made that birth will take place in a hospital setting. Maternity care in Britain has changed significantly throughout the years: in 1960, just over 60% of births took place in a hospital setting, while this figure rose to 96% by 1990 (Johanson et al, 2002).

The Peel Report (Standing Maternity and Midwifery Advisory Committee, 1970), which recommended that the safest place for women to give birth was in consultant-led maternity units, resulted in the majority of births taking place in these settings. Recent figures show that only 13% of births take place outside of hospital units (National Audit Office (NAO), 2013). The publication of the birthplace study by Brocklehurst et al (2011) challenged the assumption that hospital was the safest place for mother and baby. The findings endorsed a policy of choice that has been in place since 1993 when Changing Childbirth was first published (Department of Health, 1993).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month