Barbour RS Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001; 322:(7294)1115-7

London: Birthrights; 2013

2010. (accessed 10 November 2014)

Breen DLondon: Tavistock publications; 1975

Emerson W Treating cesarian birth trauma during infancy and childhood. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health. 2001; 15:(3)177-92

Fenech G, Thomson G Tormented by ghosts from their past': a meta-synthesis to explore the psychosocial implications of a traumatic birth on maternal well-being. Midwifery. 2014; 30:(2)185-93

Freemantle N, Wood J, Griffin C What factors predict differences in infant and perinatal mortality in primary care trusts in England? A prognostic model. BMJ. 2009; 339

Foucault MLondon: Routledge; 2003

2003. (accessed 10 November 2014)

Illich ILondon: Marion Boyars Publishers; 1995

Martin EBoston: Beacon Press; 2001

McConville B Respectful maternity care--how the UK is learning from the developing world. Midwifery. 2014; 30:(2)154-7

Miller TCambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005

Motha G, MacLeod KSLondon: Thorsons; 2004

National Childbirth Trust. 2010. (accessed 10 November 2014)

Oakley AOxford: Martin Robinson; 1980

Oakley AHarmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1986

Reiger K, Dempsey R Performing birth in a culture of fear: an embodied crisis of late modernity. Health Sociology Review. 2006; 15:(4)364-73

Rothman BK Pregnancy, birth and risk: An introduction. Health, Risk and Society. 2014; 16:(1)1-6

Scamell M, Alaszewski A Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, Risk and Society. 2012; 14:(2)207-21

Simkin P Just another day in a woman's life? Women's long-term perceptions of their first birth experience. Part I. Birth. 1991; 18:(4)203-10

Simkin P Just another day in a woman's life? Part II: Nature and consistency of women's long-term memories of their first birth experiences. Birth. 1992; 19:(2)64-81

Simkin P What makes a good birth and why does it matter?. International Journal of Childbirth Education. 2006; 21:(3)4-6

2014a. (accessed 10 November 2014)

2014b. (accessed 10 November 2014)

Thomson R, Kehily MJ, Hadfield L, Sharpe SBristol: Policy Press; 2011

2005. (accessed 10 November 2014)

Wolf NNew York: Anchor Books; 2001

Exploring the ‘good’ birth: What is it and why does it matter?

02 December 2014
Volume 22 · Issue 12


This article explores the relationship between childbirth and mothers' psychosocial experience of motherhood, through the lens of the ‘good’ birth. Case histories of eight mothers were selected and written up from research on birthing and risk in an East London locality; these were mothers who had reported an experience of a ‘good’ or ‘great’ birth (Simkin, 2006). The aim was to see what they had in common. Three core themes were identified. Firstly, whether as a consequence or a cause of their birthing experience, and most likely both, the mothers were identified as having strong personalities or ‘ego's’. Secondly, they had all experienced respectful care. Thirdly, they had experienced a transition to motherhood (Oakley, 1980) that was unambiguous and lacking in tension. Not all of these women had ‘natural’ births. The conclusion discusses the implications of this for further research and the way childbirth is managed in the UK and beyond.

A core assumption of this article is that there is a need to investigate the relationship between a woman's experience of childbirth and her experience of motherhood. Another assumption is that those involved in the medical management of childbirth—midwives, obstetricians, doulas and so on—are interested in the longer term outcomes for women who give birth. There is an important need, it is argued, to connect the somewhat diverse fields of midwifery, medicine, and the psychosocial, to understand childbirth as a physical, psychological and emotional process, and one that holds sociocultural implications (van Teijlingen, 2005; Reiger and Dempsy, 2006); for example, the emotional and psychological health of the mother after giving birth (Oakley, 1980; Talbot 2014a; 2014b), her sense of adjustment to motherhood (Thomson et al, 2011), and child development (Emerson, 2001).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month