References

Anderson T. Feeling safe enough to let go: The relationship between a woman and her midwife during the second stage of labour. Chapter 5. In: Kirkham M (ed). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010

Aune I, Amundsen HH, Skaget LC. Is a midwife's continuous presence during childbirth a matter of course? Midwives' experiences and thoughts about factors that may influence their continuous support of women during labour. Midwifery. 2014; 30:89-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.001

Begley A. Facilitating the development of moral insight in practice: teaching ethics and teaching virtue. Nursing Philosophy. 2006; 7:257-265 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00284.x

Berg M, Lundgren I, Hermansson E Women's experience of the encounter with the midwife during childbirth. Midwifery. 1996; 12:(1)11-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-6138(96)90033-9

Bohren MA, Hofmeyr G, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6

Bradfield Z, Duggan R, Hauck Y, Kelly M. Midwives being ‘with woman’: An integrative review. Woman and Birth. 2018; 31:143-152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.07.011

Care Quality Commission. Maternity Services Survey. 2018. https://www.cqc.org.uk/publications/surveys/maternity-services-survey-2017 (accessed 3 January 2018)

Carragher J, Gormley K. Leadership and emotional intelligence in nursing and midwifery education and practice: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2017; 73:(1)85-96 https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13141

Chaffey L, Unsworth CA, Fossey E. Relationship Between Intuition and Emotional Intelligence in Occupational Therapists in Mental Health Practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2012; 66:88-96 https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.001693

Crowther S, Hunter B, McAra-Couper J Sustainability and resilience in midwifery: A discussion paper. Midwifery. 2016; 40:40-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.005

Dahlberg U, Aune I. The woman's birth experience–the effect of interpersonal relationships and continuity of care. Midwifery. 2013; 29:(4)407-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.09.006

Davis DL, Homer CSE. Birthplace as the midwife's workplace: How does place of birth impact on midwives?. Woman and Birth. 2016; 407-415 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.02.004

Davis-Floyd R. Ways of Knowing about Birth.Long Grove IL: Waveland Press; 2018

Silent Witness: Care and Communication in the Delivery Room. Royal Society of Medicine Forum: Caring for the Emotions in Pregnancy, Birth and Beyond. 2003. http://www.motherhood.org.uk/emo1.htm (accessed 6 June 2018)

Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence.New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1998

Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence.London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2004

Heydari A, Kareshki H, Armat MR. Is Nurses' Professional Competence Related to Their Personality and Emotional Intelligence? A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Caring Sciences. 2016; 5:(2)121-132 https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2016.013

Heyhoe J, Birks Y, Harrison R The role of emotion in patient safety: are we brave enough to scratch beneath the surface?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2016; 109:(2)52-8 https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076815620614

Hildingsson I. Women's birth expectations, are they fulfilled? Findings from a longitudinal Swedish cohort study. Women Birth. 2015; 28:e7-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.011

Hunter B. Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery. Midwifery. 2004; 20:(3)261-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2003.12.004

Hunter B. Emotion Work and Boundary Maintenance in Hospital-Based Midwifery. Midwifery. 2005; 21:253-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.007

Hunter B. The importance of reciprocity in relationships between community-based midwives and mothers. Midwifery. 2006; 22:(4)308-322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2005.11.002

Hunter B, Deery R. Building our Knowledge about emotion work in midwifery, combining and comparing findings from two different research studies. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2005; 3:(1)10-15

Hunter B, Warren L. Investigating Resilience in Midwifery: Final Report.Cardiff: Cardiff University; 2013

Hunter B, Warren L. Midwives' experiences of workplace resilience. Midwifery. 2014; 30:(8)926-934 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.010

Karlsdottir SI, Sveinsdottir H, Kristjansdottir H Predictors of women's positive childbirth pain experience: findings from an Icelandic national study. Women Birth. 2018; 31:e178-e184 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.007

Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation.London: The Stationary Office; 2015

McDonnell S, Chandraharan E. Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation in the Second Stage of Labour: Pearls and Pitfalls. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research. 2015; 7:(12)957-970 https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2015/17022

NHS England. Building and Strengthening Leadership Leading with Compassion. 2014. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/london-nursing-accessible.pdf (accessed 1 September 2019)

A-EQUIP a model of clinical midwifery supervision.London: NHS England; 2017

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190 (accessed 1 September 2017)

Newnham EC, McKellar EC, Pincombe JI. Paradox of the institution: findings from a hospital labour ward ethnography. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; 17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1193-4

Nicholls L, Webb C. What Makes a Good Midwife? An integrative review of methodologically-diverse research. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006; 56:(4)414-429 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04026.x

Nieuwenhuijze M, Low LK. Facilitating women's choice in maternity care. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2013; 24:276-82

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards for competence for registered midwives. 2017. https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/standards/nmc-standards-for-competence-for-registered-midwives.pdf (accessed 28 October 2019)

The Code Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses and Midwives.London: NMC; 2018

Olza I, Leahy-Warren P, Benyamini Y, Kazmierczak M, Karlsdottir S, Spyridou A, Crespo-Mirasol E, Takács L, Hall P, Murphy M, Jonsdottir S, Downe S, Nieuwenhuijze M. Women's psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMJ. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347

Supporting Health Visitors and Fostering Resilience. 2015. https://healthvisitors.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ihv_literature-review_v9.pdf (accessed 1 September 2019)

Salovey P, Mayer JD. Emotional Intelligence, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality. Cognition and Personality. 1990; 9:185-211 https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG

Sosa G, Crozier K, Robinson J. What is meant by one-to-one support in labour: Analysing the concept. Midwifery Volume. 2012; 28:451-457 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.07.001

Smith AJ., Thurkettle MA, dela Crutz FA. Use of Intuition by Nursing Students: Instrument Development and Testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004; 47:614-622 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03149.x

Exploring Professional Support Offered by Midwives during Labour: An Observation and Interview Study. 2012. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Exploring-Professional-Support-Offered-by-Midwives-Thorstensson-Ekstr%C3%B6m/9b0c6f556a5ccf2bcaa07a382e96f58903c6f5a6 (accessed 1 June 2018)

WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience.Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018

Provision of supportive care

02 October 2020
Volume 28 · Issue 10
 Being fully present with women allows midwives to respond attentitively and develop a supportive responsive relationship
Being fully present with women allows midwives to respond attentitively and develop a supportive responsive relationship

Abstract

Kate Nash discusses the factors that contribute to the development of the interpersonal skills required to support women during labour, which are integral to midwifery practice

The increased pace and involuntary nature of labour physiology renders it a period of maximum stress for both the fetus and the mother, particularly within the second stage of labour (McDonnell and Chandraharan, 2015). Women have described the value of compassionate supportive care during this time, which enables them to maintain a sense of control that is adjusted to their needs and wishes (Olza et al, 2018). The notion of control is consistently valued highly by women during childbirth, alongside an opportunity for active involvement in supportive, responsive care (Karlsdottir et al, 2018; Nieuwenhuijze and Low, 2013). The sense of feeling secure enough to be able to let go and become fully immersed within the process of labour has also been reported by women as an important factor, and facilitative of their sense of coping during labour (Anderson, 2010).

The provision of effective midwifery support during labour is paramount. Women who receive continuous labour support may be more likely to give birth spontaneously, be satisfied and have shorter labours; they are also less likely to require analgesia, have a caesarean birth or develop postpartum depression (Bohren et al, 2017). How we develop our interpersonal skills to provide personalised support to women may vary among midwives, and is influenced by their perceptions of the support systems available and their ability to exercise self-awareness, compassion and integrity during their relationships with women.

Being fully present with women allows midwives to respond attentitively and develop a supportive responsive relationship

On a personal level, I can recall how during one-to-one consultations with women who had experienced traumatic births, mothers described their experiences of both supportive and unsupportive care during labour and the impact this had on their subsequent experiences of motherhood. From my own experiences of working in different clinical areas, I also understood how social expectations, the availability of resources and wider unit culture could influence my own practice. I reflected upon how such influences might subsequently impair or facilitate the provision of supportive care to women during birth.

This article considers the components that may contribute to the development of responsive intrapartum interpersonal skills and supportive personalised care during labour. Effective interpersonal skills are integral to midwifery practice (National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, 2014; Nursing Midwifery Council [NMC], 2017; 2018; World Health Organization, 2018), and highly valued by women (Nicolls and Webb, 2006; Bradfield et al, 2018). However, these are not always effectively applied within practice (Kirkup, 2015; Care Quality Commission, 2018). An increasing body of evidence demonstrates the value that the relational aspects of care has upon birth processes, of which interpersonal skills and communication play an important part.

Emotional intelligence is concerned with how we use our perceptions to manage the emotions of ourselves and others, whilst using this information to guide our thinking and actions (Salovey and Mayer, 1990; Goleman, 1998; 2004).

Emotional intelligence is described as a subset of social intelligence and associated with intuitive knowledge (Smith et al, 2004; Begley, 2006; Chaffey et al, 2012), and is positively correlated with competence (Heydari et al, 2016), as well as being a significant driver in the provision of safe, responsive and compassionate care to women. This is linked explicitly with effective leadership in the wider healthcare arena (NHS England, 2014; Carrager and Gormley, 2016; Heyhoe et al, 2016).

Understanding how midwives use emotional intelligence is particularly important, as the emotional workload of midwifery has gathered increasing attention during the last 15 years (Hunter 2004; 2005; 2006; Hunter and Deery, 2005; Hunter and Warren, 2014; Crowther et al, 2016). Midwives have reported experiencing considerable stress within the workplace, leading to wider recommendations around the concept of resilience as a mechanism to improve midwives' emotional wellbeing and subsequent interactions with women (Hunter and Warren, 2013; 2014).

The concepts of containment and reciprocity are incorporated as part of a particular skillset required for restorative clinical supervision (RCS), which forms the restorative arm of the A-EQUIP model introduced to replace statutory midwifery supervision in March, 2017(NHS England, 2017). Building upon the principles outlined within the Solihull theoretical model of parenting (Petit and Stephens, 2015), RCS aims to provide midwives with a safe space for reflection upon clinical practice with a skilled facilitator, and encompasses the theories of containment, reciprocity and behaviour management that were originally intended to improve a parent's emotional relationships with their child.

Containment refers to receiving and understanding the emotional communication of another without being overwhelmed by it and reciprocity, a sophisticated responsive interaction that improves relationship building. These concepts illustrate ways that midwives could respond to women during labour to facilitate the creation of a safe space for women to retreat into and feel safe enough to undertake the emotional and physiological work of labour.

Having the opportunity to be fully present with women appears to be conducive to midwives responding in ways that are reciprocal and attentive to women. This notion of presence has been identified as a key factor in the development of supportive responsive relationships with women within the wider midwifery literature (Sosa et al, 2012; Dahlberg and Aune, 2013). It is defined as a manifestation of midwives being with women within practice that is characterised by the support of the woman's emotional, physical, spiritual and psychological needs (Thorstensson et al, 2012; Davis and Homer 2016; Bradfield et al, 2018).

‘The provision of midwifery care…requires midwives to be able to negotiate several competing challenges simultaneously‘

Attentiveness is a key element of this (Dahlberg and Aune, 2013), and helps exemplify how the concept of ‘being present’ within midwifery-led care settings may differ from standard one-to-one care provided in labour ward settings. In these cases, midwives may demonstrate the phenomenon of absent presence, that is, remaining physically present in the room but without the provision of the emotional support characteristic of midwifery presence (Berg et al, 1996; Green and Harris, 2003; Hildingsson, 2015). This may be because of competing demands that are present within high-risk care settings and the introduction of technology.

Whilst technology within childbirth is necessary in certain situations, a consequence of this is that midwives may choose to adopt a task-orientated approach to care that is based on institutional factors and the wider culture within their unit, rather than provide care that is supportive and personalised to the individual woman. This is supported within the wider midwifery literature (Hunter, 2004; Davis-Floyd, 2018; Newnham et al, 2017) and may be reflective of a predominant focus on risk and its assessment, meaning that holistic care may not always be prioritised.

The provision of midwifery care during labour requires midwives to be able to negotiate several competing challenges simultaneously and provide care that is safe, supportive and woman centred. A dichotomy may present itself when midwives must demonstrate technical expertise aligned with the medical model of care, whilst continuing to provide personalised supportive care. Such challenges are particularly difficult in labour ward environments, where midwives may find it difficult to negotiate a terrain and find a path that balances between being emotionally present and available to women with technological advances and an increasingly complex population of women. The skills associated with RCS and a focus on developing our emotional intelligence within clinical practice may help to bridge this gap.