References

Expert on Her Own Body: Contested Framings of Risk and Expertise in Discourses on Unassisted Childbirth. 2012. https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/bitstream/handle/2453/526/CameronH2012m-1a.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1 (accessed 10 December 2020)

Carolan-Olah M, Kruger G, Garvey-Graham A. Midwives' experiences of the factors that facilitate normal birth among low risk women at a public hospital in Australia. Midwifery. 2015; 31:(1)112-121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.07.003

Davis-Floyd R. Ways of Knowing About Birth: Mothers, Midwives, Medicine and Birth Activism.Illinois: Waveland Press; 2017

A matter of faith midwifery today. 1991. https://midwiferytoday.com/product/midwifery-today-issue-017-1991/ (accessed 10 December 2020)

Holten L, de Miranda E. Women's Motivations for Having Unassisted Childbirth or High-Risk Homebirth: An Exploration of the Literature on ‘Birthing Outside the System’. Midwifery. 2016; 38:(July)55-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.010

International Confederation of Midwives. ICM philosophy statement. 2014. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2020/07/cd0005_v201406_en_philosophy-and-model-of-midwifery-care.pdf (accessed 14 December 2020)

Kitzinger S. Rediscovering birth.London: Printer & Martin; 2011

Plested M, Kirkham M. Risk and Fear in the Lived Experience of Birth without a Midwife. Midwifery. 2016; 38:(July)29-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.009

Katz Rothman B. In Labour: Women and Power in the Birthplace.New York: WW Norton; 1991

Trusting women and birth despite the ‘risks’

02 January 2021
3 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 1

Abstract

Clare Davison discusses the differences between the medical model of childbirth and the midwifery or social model, and the importance of involving women in their care during pregnancy and labour.

There are different ideologies and models in maternity care, each with underlying assumptions and philosophies relating to women and the care provided to them during the childbirth continuum. The underlying philosophy within the medical model is the assumption that pregnancy and birth are pathological conditions that need to be closely monitored and medically managed to avoid catastrophe (Katz Rothman, 1991). In contrast, the ‘midwifery model’ or ‘social model’ of care and its associated philosophy share the common ideology that birth is a normal physiological process that most women can achieve without intervention (Katz Rothman, 1991). Recognising the differences between the different ideologies and their associated philosophies is essential to understanding the way in which maternity care is provided to women. It is also essential to understand that it is not as simple as midwives following the midwifery model and doctors following the medical model, as the health practitioner's philosophy and practice is closely connected to their own personal ideologies and world view. Therefore, many doctors may practice according to the midwifery model and many midwives may practice in accordance with the medical model.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter