References

Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG.. 2015; 123:(123)49-57 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13524

Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Obstetric care consensus: safe prevention of the primary caesarean delivery. American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014; (123)693-711 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026

Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, Bréart G. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006; 194:1002-1011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817

Hannah M, Hannah W, Hewson S, Hodnett E, Saigal S, Willman A. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2000; 356 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3

Impey LWM, Murphy DJ, Griffiths M, Penna LK. Management of Breech Presentation’. British Journal of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2017; 124:e151-e177 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14465

Louwen F, Daviss BA. Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid caesareans?. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2017; 136:151-161 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12033

NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2018/19. 2019. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2018-19 (accessed15 February 2020)

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GHA, Homer CSE, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Kennedy HP, Kidanto H, Taylor P, Temmerman M. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet. 2018; 392:(10155)1349-1357 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5

Walker S, Parker P, Scamell M. Expertise in physiological breech birth: a mixed methods study. Birth. 2018; 45:(2)202-209

Why breech birth matters

02 April 2020
Volume 28 · Issue 4

Abstract

Emma Spillane believes midwives and obstetricians need to acquire more skills and knowledge on breech birth—here's why

I was recently teaching a physiological breech birth training day for Breech Birth Network, CIC where I met a wonderful doula with a vast amount of knowledge on physiological birth and supporting mothers. Following the training day, she contacted me and asked if I would consider writing a book on why breech birth matters and put me in contact with the editors of the ‘Why Matters’ book series. This has got me thinking: why does breech birth matter? Why do I continue to ensure parents have choice in their mode of birth and teach practitioners to facilitate such births? Does it all really matter? The answer is yes, I believe it does.

I recently completed a questionnaire for a delphi research study on breech birth and one comment which really struck me was by a midwife who said she has come to the conclusion, during her time practicing, that there are two paradigms with regard to breech birth. The first is those who persist in their mission to dissuade parents from a vaginal breech birth and inform others that it is dangerous. The second is those who continue to support mothers' choice, teach breech skills and use the evidence to show others that breech birth is a suitable option. I sit in the second paradigm, to improve safety through teaching breech skills, supporting others to do so and support mothers who wish to have a vaginal breech birth.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month