References

Australian College of Midwives. Midwifery philosophy. 2020. https://www.midwives.org.au/midwifery-philosophy-values (accessed 20 March 2021)

Bradfield Z, Duggan R, Hauck Y, Kelly M Midwives being ‘with woman’: an integrative review. Women and Birth. 2018; 31:(2)143-152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.07.011

Bradfield Z, Kelly M, Hauck Y, Duggan R Midwives ‘with woman’ in the private obstetric model: where divergent philosophies meet. Women and Birth. 2019a; 32:(2)157-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.013

Bradfield Z, Hauck Y, Kelly M, Duggan R It's what midwifery is all about: Western Australian midwives’ experiences of being ‘with woman’ during labour and birth in the known midwife model. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019b; 19:(29) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2144-z

Bradfield Z, Hauck Y, Kelly M, Duggan R Urgency to build a connection: midwives' experiences of being ‘with woman’ in a model where midwives are unknown. Midwifery. 2019c; 69:150-157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.014

Davis-Floyd RLong Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc; 2018

Davison CMaster of Philosophy (Nursing and Midwifery): Curtin University; 2014

Davison C, Hauck Y, Bayes S, Kuliukas L, Wood J The relationship is everything: Women's reasons for choosing a privately practising midwife in Western Australia. Midwifery. 2015; 31:(8)772-778 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.012

Davison C Feminism, midwifery and the medicalisation of birth. British Journal of Midwifery. 2020; 28:(12)810-811 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2020.28.12.810

Davison C Trusting women and birth despite the ‘risks’. British Journal of Midwifery. 2021; 29:(1)6-7 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2021.29.1.6

Dawson K, Forster DA, McLachlan HL, Newton MS Operationalising caseload midwifery in the Australia public maternity system: findings from a national cross-sectional survey of maternity managers. Women and Birth. 2017; 31:(3)194-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.08.132

D'haenens F, van Rompaey B, Swinnen E, Dilles T, Beeckman K The effects of continuity of care on the health of mother and child in the postnatal period: a systematic review. European Journal of Public Health. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz082

Donnison J, 2nd edn. London: Historical Publications; 1988

Fahy K What is woman-centred care and why does it matter?. Women and Birth. 2012; 25:(4)149-151

Fenwick J, Brittain H, Gamble J Australian private midwives with hospital visiting rights in Queensland: structures and processes impacting clinical outcomes. Women and Birth. 2017; 30:(6)497-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.05.001

Forster D, McLachlan H, Davey M, Biro M, Farrell T, Gold L, Flood M, Shafiei T, Waldenstrom U Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal. Intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS ramdomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016; 16:(28) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0798-y

Haines H, Baker J, Marshall D Continuity of midwifery care for rural women through caseload group practice: delivering for almost 20 years. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2015; 23:339-345 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12232

International Confederation of Midwives. Philosophy and model of midwifery care. 2020. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2020/07/cd0005_v201406_en_philosophy-and-model-of-midwifery-care.pdf (accessed 22 March 2021)

Jackson M, Dahlen H, Schmied V Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high-risk homebirths. Midwifery. 2012; 28:(5)561-567

Leap N Woman-centred or women-centred care: does it matter?. British Journal of Midwifery. 2009; 17:(1)12-16 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2009.17.1.37646

Leap N The less we do, the more we give. In: Kirkham M (ed). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press; 2000

Maternal health: an executive summary for the lancet's series. 2016. https://www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-health-2016

McLachlan H, Forster D, Davey MA, Gold L, Biro MA, Flood M, Albers L, Waldenstrom U The effect of caseload midwifery on women's experience of labour and birth: results from the cosmos randomised controlled trial. Women and Birth. 2013; 26:(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2013.08.259

Midwives Alliance of North America. The statement of values and ethics of the Midwives Alliance of North America (MANA). 2010. https://mana.org/resources/statement-of-values-and-ethics (accessed 22 March 2021)

Perdock H, Verhoeven C, van Dillen J, Schuitmaker T, Hoogendoorm K, Colli F, Schellevis F, de Jonge A Continuity of care is an important and distinct aspect of childbirth experience: findings of a survey evaluating experienced continuity of care, experienced quality of care and women's perceptions of labor. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018; 18:(13)1-9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1615-y

Royal College of Midwives. Midwifery continuity of carer. 2018. https://www.rcm.org.uk/media/2946/midwifery-continuity-of-carer-mcoc.pdf (accessed 21 March 2021)

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D Midwife-led Continuity models of care compared with other models of care for women during pregnancy, birth and early parenting. The Cochrane Library. 2016;

Shaw D, Guise JM, Shah N, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Joseph S, Levy B, Wong F, Woodd S, Main EK Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care?. The Lancet. 2016; 388:(10057)2282-2295 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31527-6

Tracy SK, Hartz DL, Tracy MB, Allen J, Forti A, Hall B, White J Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@Ngo, a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2013; 1723-1732 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61406-3

Caseload midwifery compared to standard of private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcome. 2014. https://biomedicalcentral.com/1471-2393/14/46

World Health Organization. WHO recommendation on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912 (accessed 17 April 2021)

Woman-centred care

02 May 2021
4 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 5

Abstract

Are women really at the centre of care in the modern maternity system? Dr Clare Davison investigates

Historically, during childbirth, women were cared for by known midwives within their own community (Donnison, 1988; Davison, 2020). Today, however, continuity of midwifery care has become increasingly difficult to find.

Following the move from the home to the hospital, pregnancy and childbirth have evolved into procedures that needs to be managed to reduce the ‘risks’ to mother and baby (Donnison, 1988; Jackson et al, 2012; Davis-Floyd, 2018; Davison, 2021). In this technocratic and obstetric-led model, the overuse of medical interventions has become routine and normalised (McDougal et al, 2016).

The medicalisation of birth has led to maternity care being provided within a technocratic, biomedical model, with most midwives now working in a fragmented hospital system where relationship-based care is often overlooked (Davison et al, 2015; Reed et al, 2017; Bradfield et al, 2018; Davison, 2019). This is not woman-centred care and contradictory to the advice from the World Health Organization (2016), that recommends that every childbearing woman, in settings with well-functioning midwifery programmes, is supported by a known midwife within a continuity of care model.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter