References

Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub2

Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, van der Post JA, Bekedam DJ, Kwee A Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: Randomised equivalence trial. BMJ. 2010; 341 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7087

Centre of Maternal and Child Enquiries. Perinatal mortality Report 2009. 2010. http://www.hqip.org.uk/assets/NCAPOP-Library/CMACE-Reports/35.-March-2011-Perinatal-Mortality-2009.pdf (accessed 11 May 2015)

Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson JP, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, Hofmeyr GJ, 3rd ed.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000

Flenady V, Middleton P, Smith GC, Duke W, Erwich JJ, Khong TY Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet. 2011a; 377:(9778)1703-17

Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K Major risk factors for stillbirth in high income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011b; 377:(9774)1331-40

Frøen JF, Arnestad M, Frey K, Vege A, Saugstad OD, Stray-Pedersen B Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: Epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases on Oslo, Norway, 1986-1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184:(4)694-702

Gardosi J, Giddings S, Clifford S, Wood L, Francis A Association between reduced stillbirth rates in England and regional uptake of accreditation training in customised fetal growth assessment. BMJ Open. 2013; 3:(12) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003942

Gomez L, Padilla L, Vega GDL, Bautista F, Villar A Compliance with a fetal movement chart by high risk patients. Am J Obs Gyne. 2003; 189:(6)

Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, Alexander S Formal fetal movement counting and risks of antenpartum late deaths in normally formed singletons. Lancet. 1989; 2:(8659)345-9

Harrington K, Thompson O, Jordan L, Page J, Carpenter RG, Campbell S Obstetric outcome in women who present with a reduction in fetal movements in the third trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 1998; 26:(2)77-82

Heazell AE, Green M, Wright C, Flenady V, Frøen JF Midwives' and obstetricians' knowledge and management of women presenting with decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87:(3)331-9 https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340801902034

Hofmeyr GJ, Novikova N Management of reported decreased fetal movements for improving pregnancy outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 4 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009148.pub2/pdf

Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (1)

Antenatal Care; Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman.London: NICE; 2008

Office for National Statistics. Characteristics of birth 1, England and Wales, 2013. 2014. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/characteristics-of-birth-1-england-and-wales/2013/index.html (accessed 6 May 2015)

O'Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale E, Heazell AE Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 29:(8)705-10 https://doi.org/10.3109/01443610903229598

Raynes-Greenow CH, Gordon A, Li Q, Hyett JA A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-32

London: RCOG; 2011

Richardson B, Bocking A Metabolic and circulatory adaptations to chronic hypoxia in the fetus. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 1998; 119:(3)717-23

Saastad E1, Israel P, Ahlborg T, Gunnes N, Frøen JF Fetal movement counting - effects on maternal-fetal attachment: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2011; 38:(4)282-93

Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, Børdahl PE, Flenady V, Fretts R, Frøen JF Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010a; 9

Correction: Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. 2010b. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/10/4 (accessed 5 May 2015)

Geneva: WHO; 1997

World Health Organization. UN World Health Statistics. 2014. http://knoema.com/UNWHODATA/un-world-health-statistics (accessed 5 May 2015)

Williams RL, Creasy RK, Cunningham GC, Hawes WE, Norris FD, Tashiro M Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 59:(5)624-32

Assessing in-utero activity

02 June 2015
11 min read
Volume 23 · Issue 6

Abstract

Given that the stillbirth rate in the UK has seen only a small reduction in the last 20 years and that fetal demise is most often preceded by periods of reduced or an absence of fetal movements, it is important to ask ‘how is the assessment of in-utero activity undertaken?’ The evidence suggests that antenatally, women should be regularly asked about their fetal movements and informed on methods of self-assessment. However, there appears to be wide variation in policy and practice, which may be as a result of the lack of consensus as to the definition of reduced fetal movements. As midwives, we offer the majority of care and assessment antenatally and as such have a responsibility for ensuring that women are aware of both the importance of self-assessment of fetal movements and the techniques.

In-utero fetal activity is seen as the hallmark of fetal wellbeing and a vital marker in the routine surveillance of unborn babies, with a further advantage that it can be assessed regularly by the mother with no need for specialist equipment or in patient care (Mangesi and Hofmeyr, 2007). However, there is currently no consensus on what constitutes reduced fetal movements leaving clinicians with limited guidance on definition and, therefore, diagnosis and management (Hofmeyr and Novikova, 2012)

In addition to being a precursor to fetal demise, a reduction in the normal pattern of fetal movements can also be associated with a number of clinical problems including intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and, less commonly, fetal abnormalities; in the case of structural conditions, with an anterior placenta (Frøen et al, 2001; O'Sullivan et al, 2009). There is concern that those fetuses at increased risk of stillbirth, who may undergo circulatory adaptations to compensate for reduced utero placental perfusion, may be missed during traditional antenatal surveillance (Alfirevic et al, 2010).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter