Immersion in water during labour and delivery. Committee opinion No: 594. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123:912-5

Aslam R Research and evidence in midwifery practice.London: Bailliere Tindall; 2000

Bergman J The Aquatic Ape Theory: challenge to the orthodox theory of human evolution. Journal of Creation. 2007; 21:(1)111-8

Benko A Waterbirth: Is it a real choice?. Midwifery Matters. 2009; 122:9-12

Brayford D, Chambers R, Boath EOxon: Radcliffe Publishing; 2008

Byard RW, Zuccollo JM Forensic Issues in Cases of Waterbirth Fatalities. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010; 31:(3)258-60

Chapman V, Charles C, 2nd. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009

Cluett E, Bluff R, 2nd. London: Elsevier; 2006

Cluett E, Burns E Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 2

Cro S, Preston J Cord snapping at waterbirth delivery. British Journal of Midwifery. 2002; 10:(8)494-7

Franzin L, Scolfaro C, Cabodi D, Valera M, Tovo PA Legionella pneumophila pneumonia in a newborn after water birth: a new mode of transmission. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33:(9)103-4

Garland DOxford: Books for Midwives; 2002a

Garland D Supporting Practice with audit. A collaborative audit between ten units with data collection during 2001. MIDIRS. 2002b; 12:(4)508-11

Geissbuehler V, Stein S, Eberhard J Waterbirth compared with landbirth: An observational study of nine year. J Perinat Med. 2004; 32:(4)308-14

Henderson J, Burns E, Regalia A, Casarico G, Boulton M, Smith L Labouring women who used a birth pool in an obstetric unit in Italy: prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014; 14

Jackson R The use of water during the first stage of labour: Is this a safe choice for women undergoing VBAC?. BJM. 2013; 21:(6)388-95

Johnson P Birth under water—to breathe or not to breathe. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103:(3)202-8

Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 3

Kitzinger SLondon: Little Brown and Company; 2000

Munro J, Spiby H Applications in context.Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010

Liu Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Du C, Peng J, Huang P, Zhang J A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labour and conventional labour and delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14

Lumsden H, Holmes DLondon: Hodder Arnold Ltd; 2010

McKenna J, Symon A Water VBAC. Exploring a new frontier in women's autonomy. Midwifery. 2014; 30:(1)20-5

McFarlin B Elective caesarean birth: Issue and ethics of an informed decision. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004; 49:(5)421-9

Morgan ELondon: Souvenir Press; 1999

Munro J, Spiby HChichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010

London: NICE; 2007

Nguyen S, Kschel C, Teele R, Spooner C Water Birth—A Near-Drowning Experience. Pediatrics. 2002; 110:(2)411-3

London: NMC; 2008

Odent M What I learned from the first hospital birthing pool. Midwifery Today. 2000; 54

Rawal J, Shah A, Stirk F, Mehtar S Water birth and infection in babies. BMJ. 1994; 309

Resuscitation Council. 2011. (accessed 20 October 2014)

Richmond H Theories surrounding waterbirth. The Practising Midwife. 2003; 6:(2)10-3

Royal College of Midwives/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2006. (Accessed 17 October 2014)

London: RCM; 2012

London: RCM; 2014

Schafer R Umbilical cord avulsion in waterbirth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014; 59:(1)91-4

Sprague A, 4th. : Craft Print International; 2011

Vochem M, Vogt M, Döring G Sepsis in a newborn due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a contaminated tub bath. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:(5)378-9

Zanetti-Dällenbach R, Lapaire O, Maertens A, Holzgreve W, Hösli I Waterbirth, more than a trendy alternative: A prospective observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274:(6)355-65

Is the evidence on waterbirth watertight?

02 November 2014
Volume 22 · Issue 11


Waterbirth has been promoted as an effective means to control pain and improve comfort in labour (Royal College of Midwives/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCM/RCOG), 2006). Proponents for waterbirth show boundless enthusiasm for the practice, citing the benefits in terms of good clinical outcomes and increased levels of women's satisfaction. Its opponents, however, demonstrate the same level of fervour, portraying waterbirth as a folly with grave potential for both mother and baby. Interestingly, the quality of literature that supports the incongruent sides of the waterbirth debate varies greatly. This article reviews the existing body of literature on waterbirth.

Waterbirth has been recognised as a clinically effective means to reduce the intensity of pain during normal physiological labour and increase women's satisfaction with their birth experiences (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2007; Jones et al, 2012; Lui et al, 2014; Henderson et al, 2014). A joint statement from the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) 2006 extolled the benefits of waterbirth, but noted that (RCM/RCOG, 2006: 2):

‘The evidence to support underwater birth is less clear but complications are seemingly rare.’

The Nursing and Midwifery Council urges every registrant to ensure that any advice that they give is evidence-based (NMC, 2008) but in light of the joint RCM/RCOG statement, the question must be asked as to whether waterbirth and, or the care of women who choose to labour in water, creates a paradox for midwives and midwifery practice. This article explores this issue further by analysing the contemporary evidence that pertains to waterbirth.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month