References

Benner P From novice to expert. AmJ Nurs. 1982; 82:(3)402-7

Bruner JP, Drummond SB, Meenan AL, Gaskin IM All-fours maneuver for reducing shoulder dystocia during labour. J Reprod Med. 1998; 43:(5)439-43

Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–08. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011; n8:(1)1-203 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x

Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Ash JP, Wilson LV, Yard E, Sibanda T, Whitelaw A Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112:(1)14-20 https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.obo13e31817bbc61

Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, Neumann K, Ouzounian JG, Paul RH The McRoberts' maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: How successful is it?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176:(3)656-61

Gonik B, Zhang N, Grimm MJ Defining forces that are associated with shoulder dystocia: the use of a mathematic dynamic computer model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188:(4)1068-72

Goodwin TM, Banks E, Millar LK, Phelan JP Catastrphic shoulder dystocia and emergency symphysiotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177:(2)463-4

Grobman WA, Miller D, Burke C, Hornbogen A, Tam K, Costello R Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205:(6)513-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.002

Hallissey C Quantum in obstetric brachial plexus injury. Clinical Risk. 2002; 8:(6)228-31

Leung TY, Stuart O, Sahota DS, Suen SS, Lau TK, Lao TT Head-to-body delivery interval and risk of fetal acidosis and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in shoulder dystocia: a retrospective review. BJOG. 2010; 118:(4)474-9

NHS Litigation Authority. 2012. http://tinyurl.com/p6roerh

London: NMC; 2008

Resnick R Management of Shoulder Dystocia Girdle. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 23:(2)559-64

Robinson J Post traumatic stress disorder. AIMS Journal. 2007; 19:(1)

London: RCOG; 2005

London: Clinical Governance Advice No 1c. RCOG; 2006

London: RCOG; 2012

Managing shoulder dystocia: Understanding and applying RCOG guidance

02 May 2014
14 min read
Volume 22 · Issue 5

Abstract

Shoulder dystocia occurs in less than 1% of births but can have severe consequences for both the mother and baby. It is also the third most common cause of litigation in the UK. A structured approach to management has been shown to help practitioners provide effective care, and since 2000 many Trusts have implemented the HELPERR mnemonic developed by the Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics group (ALSO) as a basis for care. In 2012, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) updated guidance on managing shoulder dystocia and moved away from the use of the mnemonic HELPERR; however, our midwifery students reported that they felt daunted by the RCOG algorithm and preferred to use a mnemonic to help them provide systematic care. This article sets out a modified approach and adapted version of the HELPERR mnemonic for use in practice that incorporates the latest RCOG guidance for use in the management of shoulder dystocia.

Shoulder dystocia is a relatively common phenomenon that most midwives will encounter as they care for women in labour. Evidence suggests that the incidence rate varies between 0.58 and 0.7% (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), 2012) and can result in significant neonatal mortality and morbidity. Therefore, all health professionals involved in caring for women during labour and birth should be prepared to manage this obstetric emergency. For the purposes of this article, the term midwife will be used to describe the primary care giver, although this role could apply to midwives, doctors or paramedics.

The RCOG adapted Resnick's (1980) definition and state that shoulder dystocia is defined as ‘vaginal cephalic delivery that requires additional obstetric manoeuvres to deliver the fetus after the head has delivered and gentle traction has failed’ (RCOG, 2012: 2). Despite this clear definition being accepted for many years, shoulder dystocia is under-reported. When discussing management of shoulder dystocia, students anecdotally report that midwives often refer to ‘difficult delivery of the shoulders’ that resolves with the use of the McRoberts position, and are often reluctant to make the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia. However, in order to provide safe and effective care in future pregnancies, and minimise potentially expensive compensation claims, it is essential that accurate diagnosis and documentation occurs. If care is based on the definition proposed by RCOG, then any additional manoeuvres that are used to facilitate delivery of the shoulders (including the use of McRoberts position) mean that a shoulder dystocia has occurred. Compensation claims to the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) between 1 April 2000 and the 3 March 2010 included 250 claims for shoulder dystocia with a combined value in payments of £103 520 832 (NHSLA, 2012). Therefore it is important for women, their babies and families and employing NHS Trusts that shoulder dystocia is effectively managed.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter