References

Browne TK. Why parents should not be told the sex of their fetus. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2017; 43:5-10 https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-102989

Davis DS. A bar too high: why we should not bar parents from knowing the sex of their fetus. Journal of Medcal Ethics. 2017; 43:17-18 https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103358

Greer G. Sex and Destiny: the politics of human fertility.London: Picador; 1985

Guha R. India after Gandhi.London: Macmillan; 2007

Hendl T, Browne TK. Is ‘gender disappointment’ a unique mental illness?. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2020; 23:281-294 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09933-3

Monson O, Donaghue N. “You Get the Baby You Need”: Negotiating the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology for Social Sex Selection in Online Discussion Forums. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2015; 12:(3)298-313 https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008908

Theerthaana P, Sheik Manzoor AK. Gender disappointment in India: SEM modeling approach. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2019; 22:593-603 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0929-8

Gender disappointment

02 August 2021
3 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 8

Abstract

George F Winter explains the meaning of gender dissappointment and why midwives need to be aware of it

In 1984, Germaine Greer observed of childbirth that it ‘has been transformed from an awesome personal and social event into a medical phenomenon’ (Greer, 1984). It is arguable that the transformation identified by Greer has been mediated by technological advances and the ethical dilemmas that can arise from their use.

For example, Browne (2017) asserts that prenatal sex determination is wrong in principle, not only because it mistakenly implies that sex is the same as gender, but also because the drawbacks of preventing parental knowledge of fetal sex ‘would be outweighed by the benefit of undermining gender essentialist beliefs which underlie sexism’ (Browne, 2017). Gender essentialism attributes fixed, intrinsic qualities to women and men. Davis (2017), however, acknowledges that sex is not a medical condition but suggests that if we accept the fetus as part of a woman's body, it would be as wrong to withhold information about the fetus as it would be to withhold information about a pregnant woman's genetic make-up.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter