References

The battle for Cordelia. AIMS Journal. 2016a; 28:(1)25-6

Safeguarding Compliance. AIMS Journal. 2016b; 25:(1)8-11

Ombudsman finds King's Lynn guilty of maladministration. AIMS Journal. 2016c; 28:(2)

Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011; 343:(7840) https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7400

Li Y, Townend J, Rowe R Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at ‘higher risk’ of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2015; 122:(5)741-53 https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13283

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. 2016. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190 (accessed 16 November 2016)

National Maternity Review. 2016. http://tinyurl.com/NMR2016 (accessed 16 November 2016)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Midwives and home birth. NMC Circular 8-2006. 2006. http://tinyurl.com/hqserxb (accessed 16 November 2016)

London: NMC; 2012

London: NMC; 2015

Homebirth and the regulator: An abrogation of responsibility

02 December 2016
9 min read
Volume 24 · Issue 12

Abstract

Despite recommendations, many women in the UK are denied the choice to give birth at home. Beverley Beech argues that the Nursing and Midwifery Council must be held to account.

In 2006, following considerable lobbying and consultation, the Mid wifery Committee of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) updated guidance on the responsibility of a midwife to attend a homebirth (NMC, 2006). At the time, this circular was a powerful directive that asserted the rights of women to choose their ‘place of birth’ and set out the responsibilities of midwives to support women who opt for a homebirth.

Homebirth had long been a contentious subject, but in the intervening decade since the publication of this NMC circular, birth at home is well supported by the research evidence (Brocklehurst et al, 2011; Li et al, 2015) and is part of the Government's vision for the future of maternity care in the UK (National Maternity Review, 2016). So what has happened in the intervening 10 years?

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter