Alcock and others v Chief Constable of South yorkshire. 1992.

Annual report and accounts. 2017/18.London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 2018

Nixon DJ. Should UK law reconsider the initial threshold of legal personality? A critical analysis. Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2010; 16:(2)182-217

RE and others v Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust. 2017;

Symon A. Damages awarded for ‘nervous shock’ at a birth. Br J Midwifery. 2017; 25:(6)402-403

YAH v Medway NHS Foundation Trust (rev 1). 2018;

Claiming damages for psychiatric injury during childbirth

02 March 2019
Volume 27 · Issue 3


The issue of psychatric harm caused to a mother who experienced poor birth outcomes has once again been raised. Andrew Symon reports on YAH v Medway NHS Foundation Trust

A previous article in this series recounted a court case (RE and others v Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust [2017]) in which a mother successfully sued for damages because she had suffered a recognised psychiatric illness following a midwife's negligence (Symon, 2017). It is important to note that such claims are only valid if it is established that negligence has occurred. A similar case was heard at the end of 2018 (YAH v Medway NHS Foundation Trust [2018]). Once again, the defendants admitted negligence—in this case, by delaying a caesarean section long after it ought to have been carried out. The result was that the baby (referred to as XAS) was severely asphyxiated at birth, and subsequently developed cerebral palsy.

As in the case of RE v Calderdale [2017], there was a dispute over whether the mother was a primary or a secondary victim. This is an important distinction:

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month