References

British Medical Association. Children and Young People Ethics Toolkit. 2020. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/ethics/children-and-young-people/children-and-young-people-ethics-toolkit (accessed 9 December 2020)

Capewell S, Capewell A. An effectiveness hierarchy of preventive interventions: neglected paradigm or self-evident truth?. Journal of Public Health. 2018; 40:(2)350-8

Council of Europe. European Convention on Human Rights. 1950. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf (accessed 9 December 2020)

General Medical Council. 0-18 years: guidance for all doctors. 2018a. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/0-18-years (accessed 9 December 2020)

General Medical Council. Protecting children and young people: the responsibilities of all doctors. 2018b. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/protecting-children-and-young-people (accessed 9 December 2020)

Gerry F, Proudman C, Rowland AG, Home J, Walton K. Why it is time for an FGM Commissioner – practical responses to feminised issues. Family Law Journal. 2020;

Hodes D, O'Donnell NA, Pall K Epidemiological surveillance study of female genital mutilation in the UK. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319569

Home J, Rowland AG, Gerry F, Proudman C, Walton K. A review of the law surrounding female genital mutilation protection orders. British Journal of Midwifery. 2020; 28:(7)418-429 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2020.28.7.418

Pandve HT. Quaternary prevention: need of the hour. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2014; 3:(4)309-10

Re X. (A Child) (FGMPO) EWCA Civ 1825. 2018. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/1825.html (accessed 9 December 2020)

UK Parliament. All Party Parliamentary Group on Female Genital Mutilation. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/180131/female-genital-mutilation.htm (accessed 9 December 2020)

The time is right to introduce an independent commissioner

02 January 2021
3 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 1

Abstract

The authors of Home et al (2020) respond to the Letter to the Editor on the call for an independent anti-female genital mutilation commissioner in the UK.

Dear editor, We welcome the opportunity to reply to the letter sent in response to our earlier article (Home et al, 2020) and we believe it is important to continue the debate about how to end the practice of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).

We are pleased to learn that others support the appointment of an anti-FGM Commissioner, accepting that such a post is ‘totally relevant, highly needed and should be supported’ and that it would be ‘an important step in ensuring good practice in the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of FGM crimes, as well as in the identification of victims’ (Mulongo and McAndrew, 2020).

We are interested to read the suggestion that an anti-FGM Commissioner could be involved in a comprehensive evaluation of FGM specialist services and, on reflection, we agree with this proposal, which would go towards ensuring continuity, consistency and the dissemination of good health practice.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter