References

Carle C, Alexander P, Columb M, Johal J Design and internal validation of an obstetric early warning score: secondary analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme database. Anaesthesia. 2013; 68:354-67

Saving Mothers' Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-08. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011; 118:1-203

Cullinane M, Findlay G, Hargreaves C, Lucas SLondon: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death; 2005

Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Crit Care Med. 2012; 41:(2)580-637

London: DH; 2009

Dresang LT, Davis S, Miller K, Olden C, Atwood L, 5th edn.. : American Academy of Family Physicians; 2010

Jennings J An evaluation of the effects of teaching and learning styles on the delivery of components of the Immediate Life Support Course. British Journal of Resuscitation. 2012;

Lee S Risk perception in women with high-risk pregnancies. British Journal of Midwifery. 2014; 22:(1)8-13

Lewis GLondon: CEMACH; 2007

Marchant S, Alexander J, Garcia J Postnatal vaginal bleeding problems and General Practice. Midwifery. 2002; 18:21-4

Milne F, Redman C, Walker J Assessing the onset of pre-eclampsia in the hospital day unit: summary of the pre-eclampsia guideline. BMJ. 2009; 339

London: NICE; 2007a

London: NICE; 2007b

London: NICE; 2008

London: NICE; 2010

London: PHSO; 2013

London: RCOG; 2011

London: RCP; 2012

Stables D, Rankin J, 2nd edn.. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005

A modified early obstetric warning system

02 December 2014
10 min read
Volume 22 · Issue 12

Abstract

Early warning scoring tools are embedded in the routine care of most hospitalised patients in the NHS. The underlying principles are that patients who develop serious illness will usually display abnormalities in simple physiological parameters and that if these early signs are recognised and appropriate escalation and intervention occurs, patient outcomes will be improved. Constructing a system for use in childbearing women presents a unique set of challenges. This article details how the national early warning scoring system can be adapted and used in the routine care of hospitalised pregnant and postnatal women.

For the majority of women childbearing is a normal life event. Physiological adaptations usually ensure a woman has a healthy pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal recovery. However, the increased cardiovascular reserves and other physiological changes in childbearing women can mask the sometimes inconspicuous signs of severe maternal illness. This can make recognition of impending maternal collapse difficult. ‘Women with serious illness, especially sepsis, may appear deceptively well before suddenly collapsing, often with little or no warning’ (Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE), 2011: 86). In addition, maternal wellbeing may be compromised in women of increased maternal age, obese women or women with complex medical conditions (Lee, 2014).

It is important that midwives have the necessary effective tools available to aid clinical assessment and judgement when managing potentially life-changing complications in childbearing women.

Early warning scoring systems have been developed nationally following recognition and evidence that physiological abnormalities precede critical illness (Cullinane et al, 2005).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month