Benner P. From novice to expert.Boston (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1984

Bennett M, McGowan B. Assessment matters—mentors need support in their role. Br J Nurs. 2014; 23:(9)454-458

Denscombe M. Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects, 4th edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2010

Compassion in Practice. Nursing, Midwifery and Care Staff: Our vision and strategy.London: Department of Health; 2012

Donaldson JH, Gray M. Systematic review of grading practice: is there evidence of grade inflation?. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012; 12:(2)101-114

Edwards A. Grading practice: an evaluation one year on. Nurse Educ Today. 2012; 32:(6)627-629

Fisher M, Bower H, Chenery-Morris S, Jackson J, Way S. A scoping study to explore the application and impact of grading practice in pre-registration midwifery programmes across the United Kingdom. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017a; 24:99-105

Fisher M, Way S, Chenery-Morris S, Jackson J, Bower H. Core principles to reduce current variations that exist in grading of midwifery practice in the United Kingdom. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017b; 23:54-60

Practice assessment toolkit. national ‘grading of practice in pre-registration midwifery' project. 2019a. (accessed 18 December 2018)

Fisher M, Bower H, Chenery-Morris S National survey: developing a common approach to grading of practice in pre-registration midwifery. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019b; 34:150-160

Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed.New York (NY): Herder and Herder; 1970

Methods to elicit forecasts from groups: Delphi and prediction markets compared. 2007. (accessed 7 March 2019)

Heaslip V, Scammell JME. Failing underperforming students: the role of grading in practice assessment. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012; 12:(2)95-100

Standards to support learning and assessment in practice.London: NMC; 2008

Standards for pre-registration midwifery education.London: NMC; 2009

The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives.London: NMC; 2018

Realising professionalism: Standards for education and training. Part 2: Standards for student supervision and assessment.London: NMC; 2018

Realising professionalism: Standards for education and training. Part 1: Standards framework for nursing and midwifery education.London: NMC; 2018

Steinaker N, Bell R. The experiential taxonomy.New York (NY): Academic Press; 1979

UK universities face grade inflation crackdown. 2018. (accessed 4 March 2019)

An evidence-based toolkit to support grading of pre-registration midwifery practice

02 April 2019
Volume 27 · Issue 4


Grading of practice has been incorporated into the Nursing and Midwifery Council's midwifery education standards since 2009. The literature identifies that grading practice can be fraught with challenges not least related to subjectivity, inconsistency, lack of transparency and grade inflation. An established group of UK-wide lead midwife educators recognised these challenges and through completing a three-phase project, developed an evidence-based practice assessment toolkit which aims to facilitate consistent, robust and objective grading of student practice. It is suggested that this toolkit may be useful to those developing practice assessment documentation or writing evidence to reflect a student's progress and achievement in practice

It is well documented (Heaslip and Scammell, 2012; Bennett and McGowan, 2014) that grading practice is not an easy task and can be open to subjectivity, ambiguity, confusion and grade inflation (Donaldson and Gray, 2012). Midwives have a responsibility to support and educate student midwives in practice (Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2018a). This may include making a graded assessment of practice (NMC, 2009), but all midwives will need to contribute measurable evidence that focuses on the student's performance during their period of ‘practice supervision’ (NMC, 2018b). This article explores some of the specific outcomes of a three-phase project that led to the development of a practice assessment toolkit. This toolkit may be used as a guide when developing practice assessment documents or to assist those writing evidence of student progress and assessment (Fisher et al, 2019a). A key emphasis of the toolkit is that ‘student assessments are evidence based, robust and objective’ (NMC, 2018b:9).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month