Benjamin Y, Walsh D, Taub N. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes. Midwifery. 2001; 17:(3)234-40

Bowles A, Brown AM, Rajeswari D. Choice of planned place of birth for women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus. British Journal of Midwifery. 2016; 24:(10)702-710

Cahill HA. Male appropriation and medicalization of childbirth: An historical analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2001; 33:(3)334-42

Cheyne H, Critchley A, Elders A, Hill D, Milburn E, Paterson A. Having a baby in Scotland 2015: listening to mothers.Glasgow: Chief Scientist Office; 2015

Changing Childbirth Part I: Report of the Expert Maternity Group.London: The Stationery Office; 1993

Forster DA, McLachlan HL, Davey MA Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16

Fry J, Rawnson S, Lewis P. Problems and practicalities in student caseload holding. British Journal of Midwifery. 2011; 19:(10)659-664

Hello, my name is… 2017. (accessed 21 July 2017)

Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003; 327:(7425)1219-21

Hall J, Collins B, Ireland J, Hundley V. The Human Rights and Dignity Experience of Disabled Women during Pregnancy, Childbirth and Early Parenting.Bournemouth: University of Bournemouth; 2016

Hartz DL, Foureur M, Tracy SK. Australian caseload midwifery: The exception or the rule. Women Birth. 2012; 25:(1)39-46

Homer CS, Leap N, Edwards N, Sandall J. Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socio-economic disadvantage in London: a retrospective analysis of Albany Midwifery Practice outcomes using routine data (1997–2009). Midwifery. 2017; 48:1-10

Huber US, Sandall J. A qualitative exploration of the creation of calm in a continuity of carer model of maternity care in London. Midwifery. 2009; 25:(6)613-21

Josif CM, Barclay L, Kruske S, Kildea S. ‘No more strangers’: Investigating the experiences of women, midwives and others during the establishment of a new model of maternity care for remote dwelling aboriginal women in northern Australia. Midwifery. 2014; 30:(3)317-23

Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay investigation.London: The Stationery Office; 2015

MacLellan J. Claiming an ethic of care for midwifery. Nurs Ethics. 2014; 21:(7)803-11

McAra-Couper J, Gilkison A, Crowther S, Hunter M, Hotchin C, Gunn J. Partnership and reciprocity with women sustain Lead Maternity Carer midwives in practice. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal. 2014; 49:29-33

McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Farrell T, Flood M, Shafiei T, Waldenström U. The effect of primary midwife-led care on women's experience of childbirth: Results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2016; 123:(3)465-74

Judicial review to protect independant midwifery begins. 2017. 2017. (accessed 21 July 2017)

The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives.London: NMC; 2015

One to One. Home Birth Stories. 2016. (accessed 30 October 2016)

Rawnson S. A qualitative study exploring student midwives' experiences of carrying a caseload as part of their midwifery education in England. Midwifery. 2011; 27:(6)786-92

Rayment-Jones H, Murrells T, Sandall J. An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data—a retrospective, observational study. Midwifery. 2015; 31:(4)409-17

Why midwives leave—revisited.London: RCM; 2016

Sandall J, Hatem M, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Discussions of findings from a Cochrane review of midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women: continuity, normality and safety. Midwifery. 2009; 25:(1)8-13

Smith AH, Dixon AL, Page LA. Health-care professionals' views about safety in maternity services: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2009; 25:(1)21-31

The Best Start: A Five Year Forward Plan for Maternity and Neonatal Care in Scotland.Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2017

Tracy SK, Hartz DL, Tracy MB Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 382:(9906)1723-32

West M, Dawson J, Mandip K. Making the difference: diversity and inclusion in the NHS.London: The King's Fund; 2015

Williams K, Lago L, Lainchbury A, Eagar K. Mothers' views of caseload midwifery and the value of continuity of care at an Australian regional hospital. Midwifery. 2010; 26:(6)615-21

Winter G. Alcohol, pregnancy and the precautionary principle. British Journal of Midwifery. 2016; 24:(10)

Continuity of carer and application of the Code: how student midwives can be agents of change

02 August 2017
Volume 25 · Issue 8


Despite continuity of carer being signalled in policy in 1993 (Department of Health, 1993), it remains a largely elusive aspiration in the UK. This has implications for midwives with regards to how well they can apply the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Code (NMC, 2015) and their navigation of some of its inherent tensions. From the perspective of a new student midwife, this article discusses the advantages of caseloading in applying the Code and suggests ways in which student midwives might draw from the caseload model, bringing some of its strengths into mainstream practice.

It is clear from the literature that there can be many significant advantages to caseload midwifery in terms of health outcomes for women and their babies. These advantages include reduced incidence of episiotomies (Benjamin et al, 2001), reduced rates of caesarean section (Hartz et al, 2012), fewer neonatal unit admissions (Rayment-Jones et al, 2015) and higher breastfeeding rates (Huber and Sandall, 2009; Homer et al, 2017). These advantages have the potential to positively affect women, babies and families throughout their life (McAra-Couper et al, 2014).

In Scotland, while there have been improvements in continuity of carer in antenatal services, there are still significant issues in postnatal provision and the elusive known care giver at birth is arguably further away than it was when promoted in Changing Childbirth (Department of Health, 1993); the rising number of planned caesarean sections, continued high percentage of hospital births (Cheyne et al, 2015) and the dominant care model all being barriers to continuity of carer. This has led to a focus on continuity of carer in the recently published 5 year plan for maternity services in Scotland (Scottish Government, 2017), which points to caseloading and a reconfiguration of the existing midwifery and obstetric workforce as a route to this.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month