References

Beck U. World at Risk.Cambridge: Polity; 2009

Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order Nearby Libraries.Cambridge: Polity Press; 1994

Berg M, Horstman K, Plass S, Van Heusden M. Guidelines, Professionals and the Production of Objectivity: Standardisation and the Professionalism of Insurance Medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2000; 22:(6)765-91 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00230

Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J Perinatal and Maternal Outcomes by Planned Place of Birth for Healthy Women with Low Risk Pregnancies: The Birthplace in England National Prospective Cohort Study. BMJ. 2011; 343:(4) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7400

Care Quality Commision. The Fundamental Standards. 2017. https://www.cqc.org.uk/what-we-do/how-we-do-our-job/fundamental-standards (accessed 11 December 2020)

Carvalho T. Changing Connections between Professionalism and Managerialism: A Case Study of Nursing in Portugal. Journal of Professions and Organization. 2014; 1:(2)176-90 https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jou004

Coxon K, Chisholm A, Malouf R, Rowe R, Hollowell R. What Influences Birth Place Preferences, Choices and Decision-Making amongst Healthy Women with Straightforward Pregnancies in the UK? A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Using a ‘Best Fit’ Framework Approach. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7

Curtis P, Ball L, Kirkham M. ‘Why do midwives leave? (Not) being the kind of midwife you want to be’. British Journal of Midwifery. 2006; 14:(1)27-31 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2006.14.1.20257

Davis DL, Homer CSE. Birthplace as the Midwife's Work Place: How Does Place of Birth Impact on Midwives?. Women and Birth. 2016; 29:(5)407-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.02.004

Edwards NP, Murphy-Lawless J. The Instability of Risk: Women's Perspectives on Risk and Safety in Birth. In: Symon Andrew (ed). London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006

NHS England. A-EQUIP a Model of Clinical Midwifery Supervision A-EQUIP: An Acronym for Advocating for Education and QUality ImProvement. 2017. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/a-equip-midwifery-supervision-model.pdf (accessed 11 December 2020)

Evans A. Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy.Farnham: Ashgate Publishing; 2010

Faulconbridge J, Muzio D. Organizational Professionalism in Globalizing Law Firms. 2008; 22:(1) https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007087413

Finlay S, Sandall J. Someone's Rooting for You: Continuity, Advocacy and Street-Level Bureaucracy in UK Maternal Healthcare Q. Social Science & Medicine. 2009; 69:1228-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.029

Freidson E. Professionalism: The Third Logic.Cambridge: Polity; 2001

Freidson E. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988

Frith L. The NHS and Market Forces in Healthcare: The Need for Organisational Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013; 39:(1)17-21 https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100713

Hunter B, Fenwick J, Sidebotham M. Midwives in the United Kingdom: Levels of Burnout, Depression, Anxiety and Stress and Associated Predictors. Midwifery. 2019; 79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.008

Kirkpatrick I, Ackroyd S, Walker RM. The New Managerialism and Public Service Professions: Change in Health, Social Services, and Housing.London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005

Morecambe Bay Investigation: Report. 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/morecambe-bay-investigation-report (accessed 11 December 2020)

Kleinman CS. Ethical Drift: When Good People Do Bad Things. JONA's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation. 2006; 8:(3)72-76 https://doi.org/10.1097/00128488-200607000–00004

Leicht KT. Market Fundamentalism, Cultural Fragmentation, Post-Modern Skepticism, and the Future of Professional Work. Journal of Professions and Organization. 2016; 3:(1)103-17 https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov006

Lundgren I, Berg M, Nilsson C, Olafsdottir OA. Health Professionals' Perceptions of a Midwifery Model of Woman-Centred Care Implemented on a Hospital Labour Ward. Women and Birth. 2020; 33:(1)60-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.01.004

Mander R, Murphy-Lawless J. The Politics of Maternity.London: Routledge; 2013

National Maternity Review. Better births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England A Five Year Forward View for Maternity Care. 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/national-maternity-review-report.pdf (accessed 11 December 2020)

NHS. The NHS Constitution – the NHS Belongs to Us All. 2015. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480482/NHS_Constitution_WEB.pdf (accessed 11 December 2020)

Nilsson C, Olafsdottir OA, Lundgren I, Berg M, Dellenborg L. Midwives' Care on a Labour Ward Prior to the Introduction of a Midwifery Model of Care: A Field of Tension. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 2019; 14:(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2019.1593037

Nolan ML. Home Birth: The Politics of Difficult Choices. Home Birth: The Politics of Difficult Choices.London: Routledge; 2010

Numerato D, Salvatore D, Fattore G. The Impact of Management on Medical Professionalism: A Review. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2012; 34:(4)626-44 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01393.x

Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses, Midwives and Nursing Associates. 2018. http://www.nmc.org.uk/code (accessed 11 December 2020)

O'Connell R, Downe S. A Metasynthesis of Midwives' Experience of Hospital Practice in Publicly Funded Settings. Compliance, Resistance and Authenticity. 2009; 13:(6) https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459308341439

LSA NHS England South West Guernsey Extraordinary Review Areas Visited during Extraordinary LSA Review: 2014-15 Extraordinary Review of Performance in Mitigating Key Risks Identified in the NMC Quality Assurance Framework for Local Supervising Authorities. 2014. https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/midwiferyextraordinaryreviewreports/extraordinary_review-lsa_south_west_guernsey__01-03-oct_14.pdf (accessed 11 December 2020)

Porter S, Crozier K, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. New Midwifery? A Qualitative Analysis of Midwives' Decision-Making Strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007; 60:(5)525-34 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04449.x

Powell KH. A Model of Exemplary Midwifery Practice: Results of a Delphi Study. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2000; 45:(1)4-19 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-9523(99)00018-5

Power A. Contemporary Midwifery Practice: Art, Science or Both?. British Journal of Midwifery. 2015; 23:(9)654-57 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2015.23.9.654

Power S. The Imaginative Professional. In: Cunningham Bryan (eds). London: University of London; 2008

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-Based-Medicine: What It Is and What It Isn't. BMJ. 1996; 72:(7023)71-72 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

Sardar Z. Professionals Who Lost Their Virtue. New Statesmen. 2000; 129:(4494)25-27

Sargent L. Practice and Autonomy. In: Mander R, Fleming V. (eds). London: Routledge; 2002

Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner : How Professionals Think in Action.London: Routledge; 1983

Shore C. Anthropological Theory Audit Culture and Illiberal Governance Universities and the Politics of Accountability. Anthropological Theory. 2008; 8:(3)278-98 https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093815

Skinner J, Maude R. The Tensions of Uncertainty: Midwives Managing Risk in and of Their Practice. Midwifery. 2015; 38:(July)35-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.006

Symon A. Risk and Choice in Maternity Care: An International Perspective.London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006

Taylor BJ. Reflective Practice for Healthcare Professionals : A Practical Guide.Berkshire: Open University Press; 2010

Thompson A. Midwives' Experiences of Caring for Women Whose Requests Are Not within Clinical Policies and Guidelines. British Journal of Midwifery. 2013; 21:(8)564-70 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2013.21.8.564

Wright Mills C. The Sociological Imagination.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000

Professional autonomy for midwives in the contemporary UK maternity system: part 2

02 January 2021
12 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 1

Abstract

In this article, professionalisation, the midwifery profession and professional autonomy are explored from a sociological perspective to answer whether it is possible for a midwife to achieve professional autonomy within the contemporary UK system. Within part 1, obstetric influences and frictions, government policy and guidelines, risk, litigation and increasing managerialisation were considered, highlighting the complexities of professional midwifery and the challenges it faces. In part 2, choice, service pressures, evidence-based care, consumerism, leadership and reflexive practice are considered in the context of professional autonomy and the intention of retaining women's choice as the core belief of the profession. A conceptual framework has been devised to enable this, utilising the concept ‘New Professional Midwifery’.

There is a national ambition to provide women with the power and autonomy of choice; however, the development of the concept of New Professional Management is problematic for this ideal. Understanding how a midwife's professional status contributes to women's care is important for high-quality care provision. Considering contemporary practice and reviewing midwifery professional history sufficiently enough to ask ‘why have patterns persisted?’ enables understanding of wider professional structures and reduces the focus on individual milieu (Wright Mills, 2000). Sociological imagination and knowing oneself in the context of history and politics enables the individual to recognise what is happening and to contribute to society (Wright Mills, 2000). Through exploration of the organisational, national, and professional factors that affect midwifery, in addition to what women and their family's needs are, the question ‘can a midwife achieve professional autonomy in the contemporary UK maternity system?’ is answered. This attempts to prepare midwives for future practice with a conceptual framework to support new professional midwifery and professional imagination (Wright Mills, 2000; Power, 2008).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month