Bedwell C, McGowan L, Lavender T. Factors affecting midwives' confidence in intrapartum care: a phenomenological study. Midwifery. 2015; 31:170-176

Continuous support for women during childbirth. 2017.> (accessed 4 March 2020)

Brady S, Lee N, Gibbons K, Bogossian F. Woman-centred care: An integrative review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2019; 94:107-119

Buckley S. Gentle birth, gentle mothering. A doctor's guide to natural childbirth and gentle early parenting choices.California: Celestial Arts; 2009

Carr N. Midwifery supervision and home birth against conventional advice. British Journal of Midwifery. 2008; 16:(11)743-745

Crist JD, Tanner CA. Interpretation/analysis methods in hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. Nursing Research. 2003; 52:(3)202-205

Cross-Sudworth F, Hindley J, Cheatham C, Clarke P, McAree T. Creating a dedicated homebirth service: results of a 3-year pilot. British Journal of Midwifery. 2018; 26:(3)164-170

Dahlen HG, Caplice S. What do midwives fear?. Women and Birth. 2014; 27:266-270

Feeley C, Thomson G, Downe S. Caring for women making unconventional birth choices: a meta-ethnography exploring the views, attitudes and experiences of midwives. Midwifery. 2019; 72:50-59

Foley C, Callaghan F, Olusile M. Creating a dedicated home birth team in Tower Hamlets: a review of outcomes from the first year. British Journal of Midwifery. 2019; 27:(8)507-513

Geraghty S, Speelman C, Bayes S. Fighting a losing battle: midwives experiences of workplace stress. Women and Birth. 2019; 32:297-306

Hinton L, Dumelow C, Rowe R, Hollowell J. Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018; 18:(12)1-15

Hollander M, de Miranda E, van Dillen J, de Graff I, Vandenbussche F. Women's motivations for choosing a high-risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; 17:(1)1-13

Article 8.London: HMSO; 1998

Keedle H, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen HG. Women's reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015; 15:(1)1-12

Kruger GB, McCann TV. Challenges to midwives' scope of practice in providing women's birthing care in an Australian hospital setting: A grounded theory study. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 2018; 18:37-42

Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. How women with high risk pregnancies perceive interactions with health care professionals when discussing place of birth: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2016; 38:42-48

Madeley AM, Williams V, McNiven A. An interpretative phenomenological study of midwives supporting home birth for women with complex needs. British Journal of Midwifery. 2019; 27:(10)625-632

Magill-Cuerden J. Choosing homebirth. In: Steen M (ed). Oxon: Routledge; 2012

McLeish J., Redshaw M. A qualitative study of volunteer doulas working alongside midwives at births in England: Mothers' and doulas' experiences. Midwifery. 2018; 56:53-60

NHS. National maternity review: better births; improving outcomes of maternity services in england. A five year forward view for maternity care. 2016. (accessed 4 March 2020)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. 2017. (accessed 4 March 2020)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. 2018. (accessed 4 March 2020)

Nursing and Midwifery Order. Article 45.London: HMSO; 2001

Rouse S. The role of the PMA and barriers to the successful implementation of restorative clinical supervision. British Journal of Midwifery. 2019; 27:(6)381-386

Sheen K, Spiby H, Slade P. The experience and impact of traumatic perinatal event experiences in midwives: a qualitative investigation. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2016; 53:61-72

Sonmezer E. Choice, informed consent and risk-managing women's care choices in the absence of midwifery supervision: the birth choice clinic. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2017; 27:(3)299-303

Taylor B, Cross-Sudworth F, Goodwin L, Kenyon S, MacArthur C. Midwives perspectives of continuity working in the UK: a cross-sectional survey. Midwifery. 2019; 75:127-137

Toohill J, Fenwick J, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Trauma and fear in Australian midwives. Women and Birth. 2019; 32:64-71

Young CM, Smythe L, Couper J. Burnout: lessons from the lived experience of case loading midwives. International Journal of Childbirth. 2015; 5:(3)154-165

Against the grain: midwives' experiences of facilitating home birth outside of guidelines

02 June 2020
Volume 28 · Issue 6



Midwifery standards promote autonomous decision-making and informed choice, resulting in maternal home birth choices which may contravene guidelines. There is a paucity of evidence exploring midwives' experiences of managing these choices.


To explore the lived experiences of midwives facilitating home birth outside of guidelines.


A qualitative design using an interpretive hermeneutic cycle to analyse semi-structured interviews.


Participants reported confidence in supporting maternal choices, identifying barriers including other birth supporters. Perceived levels of risk, previous experience and safety concerns impacted on confidence. Peer, unit and professional midwifery advocate (PMA) support were identified as being beneficial to midwives.


Expansion of birth choices clinics; implementation of dedicated home birth teams; guideline review for midwife led birthing units; expansion of the PMA role; implementation of a structured debriefing service and further research looking at women's choices, and the impact of the loss of midwifery supervision.

Historically, childbearing women were generally young and healthy, yet societal changes and fertility treatments have meant women who are older or with pre-existing conditions becoming pregnant have an increased risk of adverse outcomes (Geraghty et al, 2019). Coupled with this, there is a justified but increasing, focus on achieving a fulfilling birth experience, retaining choice and control; perceived to be prioritised over medical professionals' opinions of maternal and neonatal well-being (Buckley, 2009). Consequently, some women decline routine maternity care, including choosing home birth against medical guidance.

The ‘National maternity review’ (NHS, 2016) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ([NICE], 2017) recommend that women have choice of birth setting. Feeley and Thomson (2016) suggest that not all women are provided with information regarding home birth, as overstretched and at times inflexible maternity services appear to oppose unconventional choices. This is at odds with the Nursing and Midwifery Council's ([NMC], 2018) guidance and UK law (Human Rights Act, 1998) which advocate respect for autonomy and choice.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month