References

Prevention and management of pain in the Neonate: An update. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2007; 7:(3)151-60

Bellieni CV Pain assessment in human fetus and infants. The AAPS journal. 2012; 14:(3)456-61 https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9354-5

Bouza H The impact of pain in the immature brain. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 22:(9)722-732 https://doi.org/10.3109/14767050902926962

Carbajal R Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA. 2008; 300:(1) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.1.60

Castral TC, Warnock F, Leite AM, Haas VJ, Scochi CGS The effects of skin-to-skin contact during acute pain in preterm newborns. Eur J Pain. 2008; 12:(4)464-471 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.07.012

Doesburg SM, Chau CM, Cheung TPL, Moiseev A, Ribary U, Herdman AT, Miller SP, Cepeda IL, Synnes A, Grunau RE Neonatal pain-related stress, functional cortical activity and visual-perceptual abilities in school-age children born at extremely low gestational age. Pain. 2013; 154:(10)1946-1952 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.009

Effect size calculators. 2009. http://www.polyu.edu.hk/mm/effectsizefaqs/calculator/calculator.html (accessed 21 April 2017)

Elserafy FA, Alsaedi SA, Louwrens J, Sadiq BB, Mersale AY Oral sucrose and a pacifier for pain relief during simple procedures in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Saudi Med. 2009; 29:(3)184-88

Goubet N, Strasbaugh K, Chesney J Familiarity breeds content? Soothing effect of a familiar odour on full-term newborns. J Dev Behav Paediatr. 2007; 28:(3)189-94 https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0b013e31802d0b8d

GraphPad software. Graphpads Statistics Guide: Sample size for nonparametric tests. 2015. http://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/statistics/index.htm?stat_sample_size_for_nonparametric_.htm (accessed 21 April 2017)

Gray L, Miller LW, Philipp BL, Blass EM Breastfeeding is analgesic in healthy newborns. Pediatrics. 2002; 109:(4)590-93 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.109.4.590

Jain S, Kumar P, McMillan DD Prior leg massage decreases pain responses to heel stick in preterm babies. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006; 42:(9)505-508 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00912.x

Jankowski MP, Koerber HR Neurotrophic factors and nociceptor sensitisation, 1st edn. In: Kruger L, Light AR (eds.). Miami: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2010

Liaw JJ, Yang L, Wang KW, Chen CM, Chang YC, Yin T Non-nutritive sucking and facilitated tucking relieve preterm infant pain during heel-stick procedures: A prospective, randomised controlled crossover trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012; 49:(3)300-09 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.017

Melzack R Gate control theory on the evolution of pain concepts. Pain Forum. 1996; 5:(1)128-38

Morrow C, Hidinger A, Wilkinson-Faulk D Reducing neonatal pain during routine heel Lance Procedures. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2010; 35:(6)346-54 https://doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0b013e3181f4fc53

Ozdogan T, Akman I, Cebec D, Bilgen H, Ozek E Comparison of two doses of breast milk and sucrose during neonatal heel prick. Paediatr Int. 2010; 52:(2)175-179 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200x.2009.02921.x

Polit DF, 2nd edn. Trenton: Pearson; 2010

Ramenghi LA, Griffith GC, Wood CM, Levene MI Effect of non-sucrose sweet tasting solution on neonatal heel prick responses. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996; 74:(2)F129-F131 https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.74.2.f129

Statistical considerations for a cross-over study where the outcome is a measurement. MGH Mallinckrodt General Clinical Research Centre. 2015. http://hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu/sample_size/js/js_crossover_quant.html (accessed 21 April 2017)

Skinner BF The evolution of behaviour. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 41:(2)217-21

Walker SM, Franck LS, Fitzgerald M, Myles J, Stocks J, Marlow N Long-term impact of neonatal intensive care and surgery on somatosensory perception in children born extremely preterm. Pain. 2009a; 141:(1)79-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.10.012

Paediatric Pain Assessment Scales. Center to Advance Palliative Care. 2009b. https://www.mypcnow.org/blank-v4djd (accessed 21 April 2017)

Effect of gentle manual pressure on neonatal pain during heel prick: a randomised crossover trial

02 May 2017
Volume 25 · Issue 5

Abstract

This is a randomised, open-labelled, crossover trial. The data collected came from healthy, term neonates with physiological jaundice in a neonatal unit of an acute public hospital in Hong Kong. Nine babies received 10 seconds of gentle manual pressure over the needle stick site immediately prior to the stick on the first day of the data collection. They received no manual pressure before the heel stick on the second day of the data collection. Eight babies received the intervention in the reverse order. The researcher measured the babies' reactive responses to pain with the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) at scheduled time slots. No adverse reaction caused by the intervention was observed. The pain score during the heel prick was significantly lower with the prior manual pressure than with the heel prick that was performed without manual pressure (p=0.01).

Heel prick tests are one of the most common needle-related painful procedures performed on neonates in hospitals (Carbajal, 2008). Various studies have suggested that acute episodic pain can cause early neurological injury in neonates. Repeated and prolonged exposure to pain may even alter subsequent psychokinetic development, as well as affect long-term neurodevelopmental, behavioural and social-emotional outcomes. Examples include increased sensitivity to pain, prolonged hyperalgesia after acute painful stimuli and decreased visual perceptual ability later in life (American Academy of Paediatrics et al, 2007; Bouza, 2009; Walker et al, 2009a; Doesburg et al, 2013). The American Academy of Paediatrics and other paediatrics organisations have jointly stated that health workers are encouraged to use nonpharmacological methods to reduce pain in minor, routine procedures such as heel prick tests (American Academy of Paediatrics et al, 2007). Many studies have been conducted aiming to reduce pain during heel prick tests by nonpharmacological means. For example, Ramenghi et al (1996) have found that sucrose solutions significantly reduce neonate crying time after heel prick. Elserafy et al (2009) noticed that a sucrose solution with a pacifier decreased pain score in neonates during simple painful procedures including heel pricks. In Liaw et al's study (2012), non-nutritive sucking was as effective as sucrose solution to reduce discomfort in painful minor procedures. Goubet et al (2007) found exposure to a familiar odour reduced crying and grimacing in neonates having heel pricks. In a study conducted by Jain et al (2006), 2 minutes of massage over the ipsilateral leg before heel prick significantly reduce pain score in neonates. Gray et al's study (2002) suggested a mother's cuddle with breastfeeding is a potent analgaesic for neonates having heel prick. Morrow et al (2010) and Castral et al's (2007) studies also suggested that swaddling and skin to skin contact can significantly reduce neonatal pain during heel pricks. Alternatively, Ozdogan et al's (2010) study suggested that expressed breast milk without cuddling was ineffective in reducing pain during heel pricks.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month