References

Bultz BD, Carlson LE. Emotional distress: the sixth vital sign in cancer care. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005; 23:6440-6441

Gil F, Grassi L, Travado L Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2005; 13:600-606

Gessler S, Low J, Daniells E Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study. Psycho-oncology. 2008; 17:538-547

Grassi L, Johansen C, Annunziata M Screening for distress in cancer patients: a multicenter, nationwide study in Italy. Cancer. 2013; 119:1714-1721

Haverman L, van Oers HA, Limperg PF Development and validation of the distress thermometer for parents of a chronically ill child. Journal of Pediatrics. 2013; 163:1140-1146

Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005; 103:1494-1502

Kazak AE, Brier M, Alderfer MA Screening for psychosocial risk in pediatric cancer. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2012; 59:822-827

Leach LS, Poyser C, Fairweather-Schmidt K. Maternal perinatal anxiety: a review of prevalence and correlates. Clinical Psychologist. 2017; 21:4-19

Mitchell AJ. Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007; 25:4670-4681

Mitchell AJ, Baker-Glenn EA, Granger L Can the distress thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the emotion thermometers tool. Psycho-Oncology. 2010a; 19:125-133

Mitchell AJ, Baker-Glenn EA, Granger L Can the distress thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part 11. What is the optimal combination of emotion thermometers?. Psycho-oncology. 2010b; 19:134-140

Mitchell AJ, Morgan JP, Petersen D Validation of simple visual-analogue thermometer screen for mood complications of cardiovascular disease: the emotion thermometers. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2012; 136:1257-1263

O'Brien ET, Quenby S, Lavender T. Women's views of high risk pregnancy under threat of preterm birth. Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2010; 1:79-84

Pleshette N, Asch SS, Chase J. A study of anxieties during pregnancy, labor, the early and later pueperium. Bulletin of New York Academy of Medicine. 1956;

Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998; 15:(82)1904-1908

Shennan A, Jones G, Hawken J, Crawshaw S Fetal fibronectin test predicts delivery before 30 weeks of gestation in high risk women, but increases anxiety. BJOG. 2005; 112:293-298

Somerville S, Dedman K, Hagan R The perinatal anxiety screening scale: development and preliminary validation. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2014; 17:443-454

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006; 166:1092-1097

Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004; 22:714-724

Feasibility of use of the anxiety thermometer in antenatal services

02 August 2020
9 min read
Volume 28 · Issue 8

Abstract

Of the 102 women approached, 101 (99%) completed the anxiety thermometer (AnxT). The women were aged between 22–44 years (mean age 34.5 years); about half were primigravida and half multigravida. Almost two-thirds rated their current anxiety as four or above out of a maximum of 10. The most frequently reported concern was health of baby, followed by fears and worries, tiredness, and sleep problems. The high participation rate suggests that the AnxT can be developed to screen anxiety and elicit perinatal and related concerns to facilitate consultation and appropriate triaging. The problem checklist was refined based on the current results.

In many countries, pregnant women experience an increasing range of testing and monitoring procedures. Early identification of risk factors can facilitate appropriate triaging to specialist clinics with concentrated expertise, for example to address hypertension, fetal growth issues, multiple pregnancy, and risk of preterm birth. These clinics can improve the prediction, prevention and treatment of pregnancy complications but they could also increase anxiety. For example, a study reported that fetal fibronectin testing predicted preterm delivery in high-risk women but the procedure also raised anxiety (Shennan et al, 2005).

A first recorded investigation of pregnancy and birth-related psychological distress was carried out in 1956 when 50 pregnant women were asked to report on areas that they had felt anxious about during pregnancy and the postpartum period (Pleshette et al, 1956). Amidst a range of concerns, women reported worrying about fetal abnormalities and stillbirth. A recent review suggests that the number of studies reporting perinatal anxiety has grown and with wide variations in prevalence estimates (2.6–39%) (Leach et al, 2017). Qualitative research has further identified psychological distress associated with specific perinatal risks such as preterm birth (O'Brien et al, 2017). The offer of appropriate reassurances and education or triaging to psychological care is dependent on consistent recognition of anxiety and worries in an environment characterised by the high volume of clinical throughout. How can maternity staff consistently detect pregnancy related anxiety without burdening service users?

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter