References

Bauer GR, Hammond R, Travers R, Kaay M, Hohenadel KM, Boyce M. “I don't think this is theoretical; this is our lives”: How erasure impacts health care for transgender people. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009; 20:(5)348-361 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2009.07.004

BASHH recommendations for integrated sexual health services for trans, including non-binary, people working group. 2019. http://www.gpone.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/1000/bashh-recommendations-for-integrated-sexual-health-services-for-trans-including-non-binary-people-2019pdf.pdf (accessed 15 December 2021)

Berger AP, Potter EM, Shutters CM, Imborek KL. Pregnant transmen and barriers to high quality healthcare. Proceedings in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 5:(2)1-12 https://doi.org/10.17077/2154-4751.1285

British Medical Association. A guide to effective communication: inclusive language in the workplace. 2016. https://www.northstaffslmc.co.uk/website/LMC001/files/BMA-guide-to-effective-communication-2016.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021)

Goodman M, Adams N, Corneil T, Kreukels B, Motmans J, Coleman E. Size and distribution of transgender and gender nonconforming populations: A narrative review. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America. 2019; 48:(2)303-321 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2019.01.001

Government Equalities Office. National LGBT survey: summary report. 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-lgbt-survey-summary-report (accessed 19 October 2021)

Gender inclusive language in perinatal services: mission statement and rationale. 2020. https://www.bsuh.nhs.uk/maternity/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2021/01/Gender-inclusive-language-in-perinatal-services.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021)

Hoffkling A, Obedin-Maliver J, Sevelius J. From erasure to opportunity: a qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; 17:(2) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1491-5

House of Commons and Health Committee. Inequalities in access to maternity services eighth report of session 2002–03. 2003. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmhealth/696/696.pdf (accessed 6 July 2021)

Kantrowitz-Gordon I, Adriane Ellis S, Mcfarlane A. Men in midwifery: A national survey. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014; 59:(5)516-522 https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12191

MacLean LR-D. Preconception, pregnancy, birthing, and lactation needs of transgender men. Nursing for Women's Health. 2021; 25:(2)129-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2021.01.006

National Center For Transgender Equality. Understanding non-binary people: how to be respectful and supportive. 2016. https://transequality.org/issues/resources/understanding-non-binary-people-how-to-be-respectful-and-supportive (accessed 20 October 2021)

NHS. Chapter 2: more NHS action on prevention and health inequalities. 2019a. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/online-version/chapter-2-more-nhs-action-on-prevention-and-health-inequalities/ (accessed 6 July 2021)

NHS Digital. NHS maternity statistics, England 2019-20. 2020. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2019-20 (accessed 4 July 2021)

NHS Digital. Inclusive language - NHS digital service manual. 2021. https://service-manual.nhs.uk (accessed 4 July 2021)

NHS England. Definitions for health inequalities. 2021. https://www.england.nhs.uk/ltphimenu/definitions-for-health-inequalities/ (accessed 6 July 2021)

Reisner SL, Hughto JMW. Comparing the health of non-binary and binary transgender adults in a statewide non-probability sample. PLoS One. 2019; 14:(8) https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0221583

Richardson B, Price S, Campbell-Yeo M. Redefining perinatal experience: A philosophical exploration of a hypothetical case of gender diversity in labour and birth. J Clin Nurs. 2019; 28:(3–4)703-710 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14521

Riggs DW, Pearce R, Pfeffer CA, Hines S, White FR, Ruspini E. Men, trans/masculine, and non-binary people's experiences of pregnancy loss: an international qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03166-6

Royal College of Midwives. High quality midwifery care. 2014. https://www.rcm.org.uk/media/2354/high-quality-midwifery-care.pdf (accessed 20 October 2021)

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Core curriculum: CiP 13. 2019. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/careers-training/specialty-training-curriculum/core-curriculum/current/cip13/ (accessed 20 October 2021)

Scandurra C, Mezza F, Maldonato NM Health of non-binary and genderqueer people: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019; https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01453

The King's Fund. Closing the gap: Key areas for action on the health and care workforce. 2019. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/closing-gap-health-care-workforce (accessed 15 December 2021)

The King's Fund. NHS workforce. 2020. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/nhs-workforce (accessed 6 July 2021)

World Health Organization. World Health Organization regional office for Europe: WHO/Europe brief – transgender health in the context of ICD-11. 2021. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-determinants/gender/gender-definitions/whoeurope-brief-transgender-health-in-the-context-of-icd-11 (accessed 25 October 2021)

Gender inclusive language on public-facing maternity services websites in England

02 April 2022
13 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 4

Abstract

Background

Growing numbers of transgender and non-binary people are becoming gestational parents. It is important that patient-facing maternity websites reflect this. This study aimed to assess whether NHS maternity websites in England were inclusive to people of all genders.

Methods

A total of 130 maternity websites were examined for gender-inclusive language. Websites were categorised as ‘fully inclusive’ if no gender-specific pronouns or terminology was used, ‘inclusive’ if no gendered terminology or pronouns were used but ‘woman/women’ or ‘mothers/mums’ was used to describe patients, or ‘not inclusive’ if gender-specific terms were used, such as ‘she/her’ or ‘ladies’.

Results

Overall, 71.5% (n=93) of NHS services websites used language that was either inclusive or fully inclusive, but 28.5% (n=37) of providers analysed used language that was not inclusive.

Conclusions

Increasing language inclusivity in maternity services may help to reduce discrimination experienced by transgender and non-binary patients and contribute to a fulfilled and more diverse workforce.

Health inequalities affect many groups of patients in the UK. With regards to maternity care, it is often the case that pregnant people who identify as transgender or non-binary are most in need of healthcare and support and are least able to access the quality care they require (House of Commons and Health Committee, 2003). People in certain protected groups, such as age, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation, are at increased risk of the negative effects of health inequalities (NHS England, 2021). In 2019, the NHS long term plan set out a vision to reduce health inequalities from within the NHS (2019a). Reducing health inequalities and celebrating diversity is an important value for both midwifery and obstetric care (Royal College of Midwives, 2014; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2019).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month