Adnan N, Conlan-Trant R, McCormick C, Boland F, Murphy DJ. Intramuscular versus intravenous oxytocin to prevent postpartum haemorrhage at vaginal delivery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ.. 2008; 362

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ethical considerations for including women as research participants' committee opinion. 2015. (accessed12 August 2019)

Association for Improvements in Maternity Services. The National Childbirth Trust. A charter for ethical research in maternity care. 1997. (accessed12 August 2019)

Baker L, Lavender T, Tincello D. Factors that influence women's decisions about whether to participate in research: an exploratory study. Birth. 2005; 32:(1)60-66

Braun V, Clarke V. Successful Qualitative Research: a practical guide for beginners, 2nd edn. London: Sage; 2016

The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. 2017. (accessed24 September 2019)

Donovan J, Rooshenas L, Jepson M, Elliott D, Wade J, Avery K, Mills N, Wilson C, Paramasivan S, Blazeby JM. Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Trials. 2016; 17:1-11

Dhumale H, Gouder S. Ethical issues related to consent for intrapartum trials. Reprod Health. 2017; 14:(3)

Flory J, Emanuel E. Interventions to Improve Research Participants' Understanding in Informed Consent for Research: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2004; 292:(13)1593-1601

Frunza A, Sandu A. Values grounding the informed consent in medical practice: theory and practice. SAGE Open. 2017; 1-14

Gallais Le T. Wherever I go there I am: reflections on reflexivity and the research stance. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives. 2008; 9:(2)145-155

Health Research Authority. Applying a proportionate approach to the process of seeking consent. 2017. (accessed22 February 2020)

Hotton EJ, Lenguerrand E, Alvarez M, Draycott TJ, Crofts JF The ASSIST study – the BD Odon Device for assisted vaginal birth: a safety and feasibility study. 2020;

Meeting report: ethics of research in pregnancy. Global forum on bioethics in research. 2016. (accessed16 August 2019)

Lawton J, Snowdon C, Morrow S, Norman JE, Denison FC, Hallowell N. Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals. Trials. 2016; 17:(1)

McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne D. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participant effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014; 67:(3)267-277

Nishimura A, Carey J, Erwin PJ, Tilburt JC, Hassan Murad M, McCormick JB. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Medical Ethics. 2013; 14:(28)

O'Brien S, Hotton EJ, Lenguerrand E, Wade J, Winter C, Draycott TJ, Crofts JF The ASSIST study – The BD Odon Device for assisted vaginal birth: a safety and feasibility study. Trials. 2019; 20:(1)

Office for Human Research Protections. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. 1979. (accessed12 August 2019)

Patel D, Nasir S, Elati A, Vernon G, Weeks AD. Historical trends in the timing of informed consent for research into intrapartum complications. BJOG. 2012; 119:361-365

Phipps H, de Vries B, Kuah S, Hyett JA. When should women be recruited to intrapartum research projects? A retrospective review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.. 2013; 92:(11)1264-1270

Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Obtaining valid consent to participate in perinatal research where consent is time critical. 2016. (accessed12 August 2019)

Rooshenas L, Elliott D, Wade J, Jepson M, Paramasivan S, Strong S, Wilson C, Beard D, Blazeby JM, Birtle A, Halliday A, Rogers CA, Stein R, Donovan JL Conveying equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials: qualitative synthesis of clinicians' practices across six randomised controlled trials. PLOS Med.. 2016; 13:(10)

Sheppard MK. Vulnerability, therapeutic misconception and informed consent: Is there a need for special treatment of pregnant women in fetus-regarding clinical trials?. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016; 42:127-131

Smyth MD, Jacoby A, Elbourne D. Deciding to join a perinatal randomised controlled trial: Experiences and views of pregnant women enroled in the Magpie Trial. Midwifery. 2011; 28:PE538-E545

Tooher RL, Middleton PF, Crowther CA. A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008; 8:(36)

van der Graaf R, van der Zander ISE, den Ruijter HM, Oudijk MA, van Delden JJM, Oude Rengerink KO, Groenwold RH. Trials. Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: an integrated scientific and ethical approach. 2018; 19:(78)

van der Nelson H, O'Brien S, Lenguerrand E, Marques E, Alvarez M, Mayer M, Burnard S, Siassakos D, Draycott T. Intramuscular oxytocin versus oxytocin/ergometrine versus carbetocin for prevention of primary postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the IMox study). Trials. 2019; 20:(4)

Vernon G, Alfirevic Z, Weeks A. Issues of informed consent for intrapartum trials: a suggested consent pathway from the experience of the Release trial. Trials. 2006; 7:(13)

Wade J, Donovan JL, Athene-Lane J, Neal DE, Hamdy FC. It's not what you say, it's also how you say it: Opening the ‘black box’ of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials. Social science and Medicine. 2009; 68:2018-2028

Weston J, Hannah M, Downes J. Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process. Patient Educ Couns. 1997; 30:(3)239-245

World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 1964. (accessed17 September 2018)

Investigation of informed consent procedures initiated in the intrapartum period

02 April 2020
Volume 28 · Issue 4



When research involves procedures initiated in the intrapartum period, there is considerable variation in information provision. If midwives are to optimise the process of information provision and facilitate good understanding of the research, we need to understand how information is currently being provided.


To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of an approach to investigating information provision for informed consent to research involving interventions initiated during the intrapartum period.


Audio recordings of seven study recruitment consultations and six structured interviews were transcribed and analysed to construct a ‘hints and tips’ for recruitment document for midwives.


Most women and three out of five midwives agreed to audio-recording consultations. All participants confirmed the acceptability of audio-recording recruitment consultations. Midwives varied in their experiences.


This approach to exploring the informed consent processes is feasible and acceptable to women and midwives. Findings will inform further investigation of information provision in the ASSIST II study.

There is common agreement that the three key elements of informed consent, voluntarism, information disclosure (Office for Human Research Protections, 1979) and the decision-making capacity of an individual should underpin the ethical basis to a study's recruitment strategy (World Medical Association, 1964). However, it can be challenging to ensure that these elements apply when seeking informed consent from women who choose to participate in research studies where interventions are initiated during the intrapartum period (Dhumale and Gouder, 2017). Decision-making capacity can be hindered by a number of factors which interfere with truly informed consent: lack of sleep, opiate analgesia and pain (Vernon et al, 2006).

The process of deciding whether to take part in such studies is also influenced by contextual factors such as the environment, timing of consent in relation to birth, birthing support, the participant's physical and/or mental state and the user-friendliness of the study information given to women (Tooher et al, 2008). Maternity research interventions can be particularly complex. Women are required to understand the purpose of the study, the study interventions, as well as their right to withdraw, risks and benefits of participation for both themselves and their baby, how results will be shared, and how confidentiality will be maintained. It could be argued that the recruitment consultation, the sharing of study information and the researcher's assessment of the woman's capacity to have a full understanding of all aspects of the study, are fundamental to the validity of the consent process (Flory and Emanuel, 2004; Nishimura et al, 2013).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month