References

Andrissi L, Petraglia F, Giuliani A The influence of doctor-patient and midwife-patient relationship in quality care perception of italian pregnant women: an exploratory study. PLoS One. 2015; 10:(4) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124353

Attarha M, Keshavarz Z, Bakhtiari M, Jamilian M. The outcome of midwife-mother relationship in birth room: a qualitative content analysis. Health. 2016; 08:(04)336-343 https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2016.84035

Bäckström CA, Mårtensson LB, Golsäter MH, Thorstensson SA. ‘It's like a puzzle’: pregnant women's perceptions of professional support in midwifery care. Women Birth. 2016; 29:(6)e110-e118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.04.011

Dignity in Childbirth: The Dignity Survey 2013: Women's and midwives' experiences of dignity in UK maternity care.London: Birthrights; 2013

Cook K, Loomis C. The impact of choice and control on women's child birth experience. J Perinat Educ. 2012; 21:(3)158-168 https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.21.3.158

Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health Risk Soc. 2014; 16:(1)51-67 https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.859231

Fawsitt CG, Bourke J, Greene RA What do women want? Valuing women's preferences and estimating demand for alternative models of maternity care using a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2017; 121:(11)1154-1160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.013

Gray JR, Grove SK, Sutherland S. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence, 8 edn. St Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2017

Exploring the influence that midwives have on women's position in childbirth: a review of the literature. 2015. https://www.rcm.org.uk/sites/default/files/Evidence%20Based%20Midwifery%20-%20December%202015.pdf (accessed 19 March 2019)

Gunnervik C, Josefsson A, Sydsjö A, Sydsjö G. Attitudes towards mode of birth among Swedish midwives. Midwifery. 2010; 26:(1)38-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.006

Hastings-Tolsma M, Nolte AGW, Temane A. Birth stories from South Africa: voices unheard. Women Birth. 2018; 31:(1)e42-e50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.015

Houghton G. Factors influencing choice in birth place–an exploration of the views of women, their partners and professionals. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2008; 6:(2)59-64

International Confederation of Midwives. Essential Competencies for basic midwifery practice. 2018. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2019/03/icm-competencies-en-screens.pdf (accessed 20 March 2019)

James S, Wibbelink M, Muthige N. Birth method choice in the South African private sector. Br J Midwifery. 2012; 20:(6)404-408 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2012.20.6.404

Josefsson A, Gunnervik C, Sydsjö A, Sydsjö G. A comparison between Swedish midwives and obstetricians & gynecologists opinions on cesarean section. Matern Child Health J. 2011; 15:(5)555-60 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0630-7

Klein MC. Cesarean section on maternal request: a societal and professional failure and symptom of a much larger problem. Birth. 2012; 39:(4)305-310 https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12006

Kneisel CR., Trigoboff E. Contemporary Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing, 3rd edn. Harlow: Pearson; 2009

Leap N, Sandall J, Buckland S, Huber U. Journey to confidence: women's experiences of pain in labour and relational continuity of care. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010; 55:(3)234-242 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.02.001

Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer—2003-2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. In: Lewis G (ed). London: CEMACH; 2007

Lundgren I, Karlsdottir SI, Bondas T. Long-term memories and experiences of childbirth in a Nordic context—a secondary analysis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2009; 4:(2)115-128 https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620802423414

Maputle MS. A woman-centred childbirth model. Health SA Gesondheid. 2010; 15:(1)1-8 https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v15i1.450

Massyn N, Day C, Peer N, Padarath A, Barron P, English R. District Health Barometer 2013/14.Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2016

Mbye M, Tsay SL, Kao CH, Lin KC. Perceptions of midwife support during labour and birth in Gambia. Afr J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011; 5:(2)59-66 https://doi.org/10.12968/ajmw.2011.5.2.59

McCool W, Guidera M, Reale B, Smith A, Koucoi J. Professional issues related to obstacles to midwifery practice in the Americas: a pilot survey. Midwifery. 2013; 29:(8)838-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.08.007

Newnham E. Midwifery directions: The Australian maternity services review. Health Sociology Review. 2010; 19:(2)245-59

O'Hare J, Fallon A. Women's experience of control in labour and childbirth. Br J Midwifery. 2013; 19:(3)164-169 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2011.19.3.164

Regan M, McElroy K. Women's perceptions of childbirth risk and place of birth. J Clin Ethics. 2013; 24:(3)239-252

Sandall J, Hatem M, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Discussions of findings from a Cochrane review of midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women: continuity, normality and safety. Midwifery. 2009; 25:(1)8-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.12.002

Seboni NM, Magowe MKM, Uys LR, Suh MB, Djeko KN, Moumouni H. Shaping the Role of sub-Saharan African Nurses and Midwives: stakeholder's perceptions of the Nurses' and Midwives' tasks and roles. Health SA Gesondheid. 2013; 18:(1)1-9 https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v18i1.688

Sengane M. Mothers' expectations of midwives' care during labour in a public hospital in Gauteng. Curationis. 2013; 36:(1)E1-E9 https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v36i1.320

Shahid S, Jan R, Qureshi R, Rattani S. A review related to midwifery led model of care. Effective health service birth to the target population. J Gen Pract (Los Angel). 2014; 02:(05) https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000180

Soltani H, Sandall J. Organisation of maternity care and choices of mode of birth: A worldwide view. Midwifery. 2012; 28:(2)146-149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.01.009

Thompson A. Midwives experiences of caring for women who requests are not within clinical policies and guidelines. Br J Midwifery. 2013; 21:(8)564-570 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2013.21.8.564

Thompson R, Miller YD. Birth control: to what extent do women report being informed and involved in decisions about pregnancy and birth procedures?. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-62

Midwives' Voices, Midwivives' Realities: Finidings from a global consultation on providing quality midwifery care.Geneva: WHO; 2016

Midwives' perceptions of their role in mode of birth decisions

02 April 2019
12 min read
Volume 27 · Issue 4

Abstract

Background

Midwives play an important role as advocates and guides for women in labour regarding their choice of mode of birth. However, there is a paucity of research exploring midwives' perceptions of their role in how women make this choice.

Aim

To explore and describe how midwives perceive their role in facilitating the choice of mode of birth of women in labour at public sector birthing units.

Method

A quantitative, exploratory-descriptive design was used. A questionnaire was used to collect data from 288 midwives in public birthing units in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Findings

The majority of the participants agreed that women in labour should be allowed to choose their preferred mode of birth. However, nearly half felt that care providers could overrule that decision depending on the health of the mother and the baby.

Conclusion

Midwives perceived themselves as the main role players in assisting women in labour to make an informed decision regarding the mode of birth that would best suit their circumstances.

Midwives play an important role in the journey of women in labour, from conception to birth and beyond. It is acknowledged globally that midwives are critical care providers of pregnant women and are the main professionals on birth wards, providing healthcare education and information to mothers- and fathers-to-be (Gunnervik et al, 2010). As a result, one study in the UK emphasised that midwives and other health professionals should be conscious of how ‘their own bias influences women's choices' (Houghton, 2008). Furthermore, Green (2015) cited a number of sources indicating that women perceived the influence of midwives as a critical factor regarding their birth position choices. In another UK study, it was argued that women in high-income countries, contrary to expectations, did not necessarily have the freedom to choose when it came to birth place (Coxon et al, 2014). This situation is similar to middle-income countries, as confirmed by a recent study exploring the birth stories of South African women (Hastings-Tolsma et al, 2018). Hence, the role of the midwife in improving women's birth choices, such as their choice of mode of birth, needs to be further explored, especially in the context of women-centred care (Sengane, 2013). It has been argued that the lack of midwife involvement in such choices is a possible reason for the high number of caesarean section births (James et al, 2012), and that midwifery-led care leads to a greater possibility of mothers choosing a spontaneous vaginal birth (Soltani and Sandall, 2012). In terms of safety outcomes, there is evidence demonstrating that there is less likelihood of interventions when midwives are in charge of maternity care (Sandall et al, 2009). This study therefore sought to explore and describe how midwives saw their role in women's chosen mode of birth at South African public sector birthing units.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month