References

Bloomfield L, Rogers C, Townsend J, Wolke D, Quist Therson E The quality of routine examinations of the newborn performed by midwives and SHOs; an evaluation using video recordings. J Med Screen. 2003a; 10:(4)176-80

Bloomfield L, Townsend J, Rogers C A qualitative study exploring junior paediatricians', midwives', GPs' and mothers' experiences and views of the examination of the newborn baby. Midwifery. 2003b; 19:(1)37-45

Elbourne D, Dezateux C, Arthur R, Clarke N M, Gray A, King A, Quinn A, Gardner F, Russell G Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of developmental hip dysplasia (UK Hip Trial): clinical and economic results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360:(9350)2009-17

Ewer AK, Furmston AT, Middleton LJ, Deeks JJ, Daniels JP, Pattison HM, Powell R, Roberts TE, Barton P, Auguste P, Bhoyar A, Thangaratinam S, Tonks AM, Satodia P, Deshpande S, Kumararatne B, Sivakumar S, Mupanemunda R, Khan KS Pulse oximetry as a screening test for congenital heart defects in newborn infants: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess. 2012; 16:(2)v-xiii https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16020

Green K, Oddie S The value of the postnatal examination in improving child health. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008; 93:(5)F389-93 https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.122465

Hall DM The role of the routine neonatal examination: it has many aims, few of them evaluated. BMJ. 1999; 318:619-20

Hall DM, Elliman D, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003

Hayes J, Dave S, Rogers C, Quist-Therson E, Townsend J A national survey in England of the routine examination of the newborn baby. Midwifery. 2003; 19:(4)277-84

Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Eastwood DM, Engesaster LB, Rosendahl K Screening strategies for hip dysplasia: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2013; 132:(3)492-501 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0911

Lambeek AF, De Hundt M, Vlemmix F, Akerboom BM, Bais JM, Papatsonis DN, Mol BW, Kok M Risk of developmental dysplasia of the hip in breech presentation: the effect of successful external cephalic version. BJOG. 2013; 120:(5)607-12 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12013

Mahan ST, Katz JN, Kim YJ To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91:(7)1705-19 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00122

London: Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 2008

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Postnatal care up to 8 weeks after birth. Clinical guideline 37. 2006. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg37 (accessed 12 November 2015)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal care: Evidence Update May 2013. 2013. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62/evidence/cg62-antenatal-care-evidence-update2 (accessed 12 November 2015)

Rogers C, Bloomfield L, Townsend J A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and views of extending their role to the examination of the newborn baby. Midwifery. 2003; 19:(1)55-62

Sewell MD, Eastwood DM Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip-where do we go from here?. Int Orthop. 2011; 35:(9)1359-67 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1257-z

London: Department of Health and Social Security; 1986

Stapleton H Is there a difference between a free gift and a planned purchase? The use of evidence-based leaflets in maternity care. In: Kirkham M. New York: Palgrave McMillan; 2004

Townsend J, Wolke D, Hayes J, Davé S, Rogers C, Bloomfield L, Quist-Therson E, Tomlin M, Messer D Routine examination of the newborn: the EMREN study. Evaluation of an extension of the midwife role including a randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained midwives and paediatric senior house officers. Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8:(14)iii-iv

London: NHS; 2008

London: NHS; 2014

UK National Screening Committee. Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening Pilot. 2015. http://tinyurl.com/pnye2l3 (accessed 12 November 2015)

Wolke D, Dave S, Hayes J, Townsend J, Tomlin M Routine examination of the newborn and maternal satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002; 86:(3)F155-60

Woodacre T, Dhadwal A, Ball T, Edwards C, Cox PJ The costs of late detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Child Orthop. 2014; 8:(4)325-32 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0599-7

National survey of current practice standards for the newborn and infant physical examination

02 December 2015
23 min read
Volume 23 · Issue 12

Abstract

Objectives:

To determine compliance with recommended standards for the newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE), identify which professionals were performing the NIPE and determine standards for screening and management of babies at risk of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) or congenital heart disease (CHD).

Design:

In autumn 2014, an online questionnaire was sent to all heads of midwifery in the UK.

Key findings:

Completed questionnaires were returned from 64.3% (n=99/154) of targeted NHS Trusts. The main professionals performing the NIPE were paediatricians, midwives and neonatal practitioners. 95% of responding Trusts employed midwives qualified to perform the NIPE, with 13.7% of midwives employed in the UK NIPE-qualified. Midwives performed over 50% of NIPEs in more than 20% of Trusts where babies were born in the consultant-led delivery suite, and 70% of Trusts where babies were born in a midwifery-led setting. All respondents believed the optimum time for the NIPE was before 72 hours, and all but one Trust usually achieved this. Overall, nearly 80% of respondents rated the value of NIPE as a screening tool as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’.

Conclusions:

Despite evidence for the safety and cost-effectiveness of midwives examining the newborn, plus previous recommendations for expanding NIPE training, the number of NIPE-qualified midwives remains low. Considerable variation was found between Trusts for screening for DDH and CHD.

Implications for practice:

The few midwives with NIPE training are examining far more babies than those in their caseload, which undermines the principles of continuity of care. There is scope for improvement in the quality and consistency of information to parents and follow-up processes. There is a need for the development of more robust guidelines for practice and improved screening for neonates.

The newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) is an integral part of child health surveillance in the UK, with current standards recommending all babies have a NIPE performed within 72 hours of birth and again at 6-8 weeks of age (Hall and Elliman, 2003; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2006; UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC), 2008).

Traditionally, the NIPE was performed by paediatric senior house officers (SHOs); however, changes to the organisation and provision of maternity services provided the impetus for other professionals, particularly midwives developing their practice, to include responsibility for NIPE within their professional scope. The cost-effectiveness of developing the midwife's role to include the NIPE was demonstrated in a study by Townsend et al (2004). This study comprised several arms, including a randomised trial of 826 mother-and-baby pairs (Wolke et al, 2002; Bloomfield et al, 2003a; 2003b; Hayes et al, 2003; Rogers et al, 2003; Townsend et al, 2004), to either a midwife examination or an examination by a SHO; a comparative study of the appropriate referral rates; and a video assessment comparing the quality of midwives' and SHOs' examinations (Bloomfield et al, 2003b). The study reported significantly greater maternal satisfaction with neonatal examinations performed by midwives than by SHOs (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.75, P<0.001), and concluded that developing the role of the midwife to include the NIPE would not only increase maternal satisfaction with the NIPE, but would also result in improved quality of the examination and a reduction in health service costs (Townsend et al, 2004). Practice recommendations arising from the study included extending the midwife's role to include the NIPE and expanding the criteria for babies suitable for midwives' examination. Consideration to include the NIPE as part of the pre-registration education of midwives was also recommended (Wolke et al, 2002; Bloomfield et al, 2003a; 2003b; Hayes et al, 2003; Rogers et al, 2003; Townsend et al, 2004).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter