References

Chitty LS, Finning K, Massey E, Soothill P, Daniels G Antenatal determination of fetal rhesus (RH) D status using cell free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation before 20 weeks' gestation: is routine application practical and beneficial?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96:Fa11-Fa12 https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2011.300160.36

Clausen FB, Christiansen M, Steffensen R Report of the first nationally implemented clinical routine screening for fetal RHD in D-pregnant women to ascertain the requirement for antenatal RhD prophylaxis. Transfusion. 2012; 52:(4)752-8

de Haas M, van der Ploeg CPB, Scheffer PG A nation-wide fetal RHD screening programme for targeted antenatal and postnatal anti-D. ISBT Sci Ser. 2012; 7:(1)164-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2824.2012.01600.x

Finning KM, Martin PG, Soothill PW, Avent ND Prediction of fetal D status from maternal plasma: introduction of a new noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping service. Transfusion. 2002; 42:(8)1079-85

Finning K, Martin P, Summers J, Massey E, Poole G, Daniels G Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study. BMJ. 2008; 336:(7648)816-18

Hadley A, Soothill PWCambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005

Kent J, Farrell AM, Soothill P Routine administration of Anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-87

Lo YM, Hjelm NM, Fidler C Prenatal diagnosis of fetal RhD status by molecular analysis of maternal plasma. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:(24)1734-8

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for women who are rhesus D negative. 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta156 (accessed 7 January 2016)

Oxenford K, Silcock C, Hill M, Chitty L Routine testing of fetal Rhesus D status in Rhesus D negative women using cell-free fetal DNA: an investigation into the preferences and information needs of women. Prenat Diagn. 2013; 33:(7)688-94 https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4135

Soothill PW, Lo YM Scientific Impact Paper No. 15..London: RCOG; 2014

Soothill PW, Finning K, Latham T, Wreford-Bush T, Ford J, Daniels G Use of cffDNA to avoid administration of anti-D to pregnant women when the fetus is RhD-negative: implementation in the NHS. BJOG. 2015; 122:(12)1682-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13055

Wikman AT, Tiblad E, Karlsson A, Olsson ML, Westgren M, Reilly M Noninvasive single-exon fetal RHD determination in a routine screening program in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120:(2 Pt 1)227-34

Cell-free DNA fetal blood group testing for RhD-negative pregnant women: Implications for midwifery

02 February 2016
9 min read
Volume 24 · Issue 2

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) RhD testing of maternal plasma has been implemented in Avon as a clinical service, so that normal rhesus D-negative pregnant women (about 15% of pregnant women) are only given antenatal anti-D if the fetus is RhD positive. As a result, only RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-positive baby are given antenatal anti-D, meaning that about 40% of healthy RhD-negative pregnant women need not be exposed to a blood product that is pooled from many donors. This also means health services can conserve the use of a costly product (requiring deliberate sensitisation of volunteers) that can be in short supply, for those who need it. The cfDNA RhD test is now available in NHS laboratories and this article proposes that maternity services should implement this approach across the country.

Red cell (D) allo-immunisation is a complication of pregnancy that can occur when a pregnant woman does not have the D antigen on her red blood cells (RhD negative) but her fetus does (RhD positive). When fetal blood cells pass into the maternal blood during pregnancy, an immune response can be triggered that produces anti-D antibodies, a process called sensitisation. Anti-D is an immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody that passes across the placenta from mother to fetus and may result in haemolytic immune destruction of fetal red blood cells. Possible fetal complications from this process may include anaemia, hydrops fetalis and intrauterine death (haemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn (HDFN)) (Hadley and Soothill, 2005). A fetus of a sensitised primigravid woman may not be severely affected, but that becomes increasingly likely in subsequent pregnancies as the immune response becomes stronger. Therefore, women found to have RhD sensitisation should be referred to a fetal medicine unit without delay. The placenta is able to metabolise and transfer the bilirubin produced by fetal haemolysis to the mother during pregnancy, but after birth, haemolysis in the neonate may lead to the development of hyper-bilirubinaemia, and severe jaundice may result in kernicterus brain damage. After a neonate has been affected, the disease severity usually increases in each subsequent pregnancy with a RhD-positive fetus, related to the anti-D concentration in the mother's blood.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month