American Academy of Family Physicians. Recommended Curriculum Guidelines for Family Medicine Residents: Point of Care Ultrasound. 2018. (accessed 28 May 2021)

Bricker L, Medley N, Pratt JJ. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; (6)

Campbell S. A short history of sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology. Facts, Views and Vision in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2013; 5:(3)213-229

Dietrich CF, Goudie A, Chiorean L, Cui XW, Gilja OH, Dong Y Point of care ultrasound: a WFUMB position paper. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2017; 43:(1)49-58

Galjaard S, Baeck S, Ameye L, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Devlieger R. Use of a pocket-sized ultrasound machine (PUM) for routine examinations in the third trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 44:(1)64-68

Gammeltoft T. Sonography and sociality. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2007; 21:(2)133-153

Henrichs J, Verfaille V, Jellema P, Viester L, Pajkrt E, Wilschut J Effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasonography to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancy (the IRIS study): nationwide, pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2019; 367

Intergrowth-21st. The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. (accessed 28 May 2021)

International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Projects. 2021. (accessed 1 June 2021)

Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Bukowski R First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 353:(19)2001-11

Mbuyita S, Tillya R, Godfrey R, Kinyonge I, Shaban J, Mbaruku G. Effects of introducing routinely ultrasound scanning during Ante Natal Care (ANC) clinics on number of visits of ANC and facility delivery: a cohort study. Archives of Public Health. 2015; 73:(1)

Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to add a fifth pillar to bedside physical examination: inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation, and insonation. JAMA Cardiology. 2018; 3:(4)346-350

Perinatal Institute. Fetal growth. 2021. (accessed 28 May 2021)

Porter P, Muirhead F, Brisbane J, Schneider B, Choveaux J, Bear N Accuracy, clinical utility, and usability of a wireless self-guided fetal heart rate monitor. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; 137:(4)673-681

Royal College of Midwives. RCM. concerned about home Doppler machines for use by pregnant women. 2017. (accessed 1 June 2021)

Rykkje A, Carlsen JF, Nielsen MB. Hand-held ultrasound devices compared with high-end ultrasound systems: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019; 9:(2)

Saving Babies' Lives. A care bundle for reducing perinatal mortality. 2019. (accessed 1 June 2021)

Sayasneh A, Preisler J, Smith A, Saso S, Naji O, Abdallah Y Do pocket-sized ultrasound machines have the potential to be used as a tool to triage patients in obstetrics and gynecology?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 40:(2)145-50

Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith GCS. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2015; 386:(10008)2089-2097

Swanson JO, Nathan RO, Swanson DL, Perez KM, Bresnahan BW, Mirza W Use of ultrasound and mHealth to improve perinatal outcomes in low and middle income countries. Seminars in Perinatology. 2019; 43:(5)267-272

van Uitert EM, Exalto N, Burton GJ, Willemsen SP, Koning AH, Eilers PH Human embryonic growth trajectories and associations with fetal growth and birthweight. Human Reproduction. 2013; 28:(7)1753-1761

Wastlund D, Moraitis AA, Dacey A, Sovio U, Wilson ECF, Smith GCS. Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis. PLOS Medicine. 2019; 16:(4)

Use of ultrasound in the antenatal space

02 July 2021
Volume 29 · Issue 7


The first practical medical ultrasound machine was pioneered in the antenatal practice. Next, the rapid progress in the antenatal care and research demanded/propelled major advances in ultrasound technology and vice versa. Today, ultrasonography has become a part of pregnancy journey, emotional experience and bonding. Affordable pocket-sized ultrasound scanners and remote image transmission technology hold a new promise in rural areas. Point-of-care ultrasound by midwives for fetal growth and wellbeing is a growing domain. This article discusses current challenges and potential developments pertaining to the role of ultrasound in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy in different resource settings.

The specialty of obstetrics pioneered application of ultrasonography to clinical practice in the 1950s and subsequently was the driving force behind the major advances in medical ultrasound technology (Campbell, 2013). Utrasonography has transformed the care in pregnancy as well as how pregnancy is conceptualised and experienced by women (Gammeltoft, 2007). When asked to name three leading improvements in obstetrics and gynaecology in the 20th century, a former President of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, replied, ‘Ultrasound, ultrasound and ultrasound’ (Campbell, 2013). This article discusses current and potential applications of ultrasound in the antenatal period, along with different models of integrating and delivering ultrasound services together with the increasing role of midwives in the context of recent advances.

Obstetrician Ian Donald from Glasgow is credited to have designed and used the first practical ultrasound machine in clinical practice in 1958 (Campbell, 2013) (Figure 1). Since then, rapid progress has occurred in ultrasound technology from static to real-time scanners using grey scale high resolution imaging. Doppler technology was incorporated with colour, power and pulse wave imaging. Current high-specification ultrasound scan machines (HSUM) generally include colour/power Doppler, 3D imaging and advanced software for several medical/obstetric applications (Figure 2). Ultrasound delivers no ionising radiation and hence is safe to the smallest embryo with standard usage. Moreover, it is significantly less expensive than comparable imaging technologies like computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, HSUMs are small enough to house in small clinic rooms. However, the operator has a greater degree of control, making ultrasonography more operator dependent than other forms of imaging. This clearly has implications for education, training, qualification and quality control. A minimum of a combined screening scan (11–14 weeks) and a fetal anomaly scan (18–20 weeks) are now part of routine antenatal care.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month