References

Alianmoghaddam N, Phibbs S, Benn C. “I did a lot of Googling”: a qualitative study of exclusive breastfeeding support through social media. Women Birth. 2019; 32:(2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.008

Baker B, Yang I. Social media as social support in pregnancy and the postpartum. Sexual Reprod Healthcare. 2018; 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.05.003

Brady S, Lee N, Gibbons K, Bogossian F. Woman-centred care: an integrative review of the empirical literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019; 94 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.001

Brown A. Informed is best: how to spot fake news about your pregnancy, birth and baby.London: Pinter and Martin Publishers; 2019

Chou WS, Gaysynsky A, Cappella JN. Where we go from here: health misinformation on social media. Am J Public Health. 2020; 110:(S3)S273-S275 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305905

Downer T, Gray M, Capper T. Online learning and teaching approaches used in midwifery programs: a scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2021; 103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104980

Erikainen S, Pickersgill M, Cunningham-Burley S, Chan S. Patienthood and participation in the digital era. Digital Health. 2019; 5 https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619845546

Gleeson D, Craswell A, Jones CM. Women's use of social networking sites related to childbearing: an integrative review. Women Birth. 2019; 32:(4) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.10.010

Goanta C, Ranchordás S. The regulation of social media influencers: an introduction. In: Goanta C, Ranchordás S (eds). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2020

Goertzel T. Belief in conspiracy theories. Pol Psychol. 1994; 15:(4)731-742 https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630

Goldberg H. Informed decision making in maternity care. J Perinat Educ. 2009; 18:(1)32-40 https://doi.org/10.1624/105812409x396219

Hunter A, Devane D, Houghton C, Grealish A, Tully A, Smith V. Woman-centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: thematic analysis of women's and clinicians' experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1521-3

International Confederation of Midwives. International code of ethics for midwives. 2014. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2019/10/eng-international-code-of-ethics-for-midwives.pdf (accessed 11 January 2023)

Kohle FH. Reappraising social media: the rise of the global digital family.Pennsylvania: IGI Global; 2022

Leap N. Woman-centred or women-centred care: does it matter?. Br J Midwifery. 2009; 17:(1) https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2009.17.1.37646

Lupton D. Young people's use of digital health technologies in the global north: narrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23:(1) https://doi.org/10.2196/18286

Martin CJH, Robb Y. Women's views about the importance of education in preparation for childbirth. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013; 13:(6)512-518 https://doi.org/10.2196/18286

McLeish J, Redshaw M. Mothers' accounts of the impact on emotional wellbeing of organised peer support in pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1220-0

Morgan L. Conceptualising woman-centred care in midwifery. Can J Midwifery Res Pract. 2015; 14:(1)8-15

Nickerson RS. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998; 2:(2)175-220 https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

O'Connell MA. Preventing, recognising, and responding to fear of childbirth and birth trauma. BMJ. 2019; 365:(12279) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2279

Perriman N, Davis DL, Ferguson S. What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: a systematic review with meta-synthesis. Midwifery. 2018; 62:220-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.011

Scherer L D, McPhetres J, Pennycook G Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses. Health Psychol. 2021; 40:(4) https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000978

Serçekuş P, Değirmenciler B, Özkan S. Internet use by pregnant women seeking childbirth information. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021; 50:(8) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102144

Shine D, Minehan M, Knight-Agarwal C. #Healthpromotion: a qualitative exploration of how dietitians can use social media to positively influence women aged 18–35 years. Nutr Diet. 2022; 79:(4)489-496 https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12765

Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011; 52:(2) https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592

Tian Y, Robinson JD. Social media and health. In: Thompson TL, Parrott R, Nussbaum JF (eds). London: Routledge; 2021

Tranter R, McGraw C. Integrating social media into routine midwifery services: maternity direct+. Br J Midwifery. 2017; 25:(7)458-464 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2017.25.7.458

Vamos CA, Merrell L, Detman L, Louis J, Daley E. Exploring women's experiences in accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying health information during pregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019; 64:(4)472-480 https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12965

Vogels-Broeke M, Daemers D, Budé L, de Vries R, Nieuwenhuijze M. Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04422-7

Whitehead D. “The story God is weaving us into”: narrativizing grief, faith, and infant loss in US evangelical women's blog communities. New Rev Hypermedia Multimed. 2015; 21:(1-2) https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2014.983559

Witteman HO, Fagerlin A, Exe N, Trottier M, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. One-sided social media comments influenced opinions about home birth: an experimental study. Health Affairs. 2016; 35:(4)726-723 https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1382

Wu Song F, Ellis West J, Lundy L, Smith Dahmen N. Women, pregnancy, and health information online: the making of informed patients and ideal mothers. Gender Soc. 2012; 26:(5)773-708 https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212446336

Midwifery care and social media

02 February 2023
Volume 31 · Issue 2

Abstract

Rachelle Chee, Tanya Capper and Olav Muurlink discuss navigating the challenges of providing women-centred care in the social media age

The internet, and in particular social media, now play a significant role in the day-to-day life of billions of people across the world. The ease of access to online material, an abundance of which relates to pregnancy, birth and early parenting, means that midwives, mothers and their families are no exception to the significant role of the internet, and use this vast resource to gain knowledge and understanding. While pregnant and new parents do gain a sense of empowerment by accessing the diverse range of information that the internet provides, there is also a very real risk that many of these sources lack scientific rigour or are biased. This becomes particularly problematic for midwives when obtaining true informed consent to maternity care and when supporting women and their families to make decisions that may impact the health and wellbeing of mother and baby.

The internet and social media platforms have become incorporated into many facets of contemporary midwifery practice, and this has arguably led to a range of both positive and negative impacts. Accessing the internet has been made easy because of the compact and mobile nature of smartphones and tablets, enabling midwives and students, at the touch of a button, to locate, share and evaluate research findings, access online learning materials and network with their peers (Downer et al, 2021).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month