References

Immersive clinical simulation in undergraduate health care. Interprofessional education, knowledge and perceptions. 2014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.12.006

Anderson G Students as valuable but vulnerable participants in research: getting the balance right utilising a feminist approach and focus group interviews. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2011; 9:(1)30-4

Anderson G An evaluation of direct-entry student midwives' perception of normal birth. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2015; 13:(2)66-70

Stereotyping as a barrier to collaboration: does interprofessional education make a difference?. 2011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.004

The power of prepositions: learning with, from and about others in the context of interprofessional education. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.715605

Promoting interprofessional education. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.03.003

Developing inter-professional learning: Tactics, teamwork and talk. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.09.006

Carpenter J, Dickinson C Contact is not enough: an intergroup perspective on stereotypes and stereotype change in interprofessional education.Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science; 2011

Cambridge: Midwifery 2020 Programme; 2010

Clewes C Normal birth and its meaning: a discussion paper. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2013; 11:(1)16-20

Reducing risk in maternity by optimising teamwork and leadership: an evidence-based approach to save mothers and babies. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.04.004

Creating a collaborative culture in maternity care. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.004

Grutterink H, Van der Vegt GS, Molleman E, Jehn KA Reciprocal Expertise affirmation and shared expertise. Perceptions in work teams: their implications for coordinated action and team performance. Appl Psychol. 2013; 62:(3)359-81 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00484.x

Inter-professional collaboration in delivery suite: A qualitative study. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2010.10.001

The importance of education in preparing women for childbirth. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.05.012

London: The King's Fund; 2008

Kirkup BLondon: The Stationery Office; 2015

Kozlowski SW, Ilgen DR Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006; 7:(3)77-124

Can we teach core clinical obstetrics and gynaecology skills using low fidelity simulation in an interprofessional setting?. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12252

Interprofessional simulation-based education program: A promising approach for changing stereotypes and improving attitudes toward nurse–physician collaboration. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.03.005

Crossing professional barriers with peer-assisted learning: undergraduate midwifery students teaching undergraduate paramedic students. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.10.016

McPherson K, Headrick L, Moss F Working and learning together: good quality care depends on it, but how can we achieve it?. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10:ii46-ii53

Just working in a team was a great experience… – Student perspectives on the learning experiences of an interprofessional education program. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2013.769093

Teamwork culture and patient satisfaction in hospitals. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000124389.58422.b2

Low-versus high-fidelity simulations in teaching and assessing clinical skills. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.01.008

From school to work: promoting the application of pre-qualification interprofessional education in the clinical workplace. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.10.009

London: NMC; 2015

From students to professionals: results of a longitudinal study of attitudes to pre-qualifying collaborative learning and working in health and social care in the United Kingdom. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802190483

Working together: collaboration between midwives and doctors in public hospitals. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH090315

London: RCOG Press; 2008

Ruiz M, Limonero J Professional attitudes towards normal childbirth in a shared care unit. Midwifery. 2013; 30:(7)810-16

Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5

Evaluation of a strategy to improve undergraduate experience in obstetrics and gynaecology. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03394.x

Stewart M Feminisms and intrapartum care.Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2010

West M, Borrill C The influence of team working.Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2005

Are female students in general and nursing students more ready for teamwork and interprofessional collaboration in healthcare?. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-15

Wilkins R Poor relations: the paucity of the professional paradigm, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan; 2010

Geneva: WHO; 2010

Enhancing inter-professional education through low-fidelity simulation

02 January 2017
14 min read
Volume 25 · Issue 1

Abstract

Background

An interprofessional education initiative was developed and piloted in 2014 at Queen's University Belfast, within the School of Nursing and Midwifery and the School of Medicine.

Aims

The aim of the collaboration was to introduce concepts of normal labour and birth to fourth-year medical students, led by final-year midwifery students.

Methods

A variety of birthing resources were available to the midwifery students to promote interactivity with the medical students, including birthing balls and birth manikins. Artistic licence in relation to planning the activities was encouraged. Significant emphasis was placed on the importance of relationship-building with women in labour, and the concept of being ‘with woman’ was core to all elements of teaching. Midwifery students undertook acting roles such as the labouring woman, partner or midwife role and acted out mini scenarios such as contacting for advice about early labour, positions for labour or positions for birth. Medical students were encouraged to participate in the role play, and the interactive workshop culminated with a hands-on simulation of childbirth.

Findings

Evaluation of the workshops has been extremely positive. The midwifery students reported a perceived benefit of teamwork in preparing for the workshop and also a perceived increased level of confidence.

Conclusion

Both schools have recognised the benefits of this form of inter-professional education and have subsequently made a commitment to embed it within their respective curricula.

The increased recognition of midwives as lead professionals in low-risk pregnancy and birth, and the proliferation of midwifery-led units within the NHS, have raised the profile of midwifery in the health-care setting in recent years (Chief Nursing Officers of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, 2010; Sandall et al, 2016). However, Wilkins (2010) has argued that while midwives have rejected the medicalisation of childbirth, they have not truly recognised their unique professional role and moulded new ways of inter-professional working. If midwives do not nurture and embrace inter-professionalism, there is a risk of increased tension, conflict and potential indecision between colleagues arising from changes to the traditional medical dominance that has previously existed in maternity care (Reiger and Lane, 2009). Recent findings from the Kirkup report unearthed the dangers of poor relationships between midwives and doctors where a ‘them and us’ culture of behaviour existed, leading to catastrophic breakdowns in communication in the maternity care setting (Kirkup, 2015: 13). Responsibilities for partnership working are reiterated in the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC, 2015) Code, to ensure effective care-giving and emphasising the need to respect colleagues' roles and expertise.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month