References

Bower H. Educating the midwife. In: Mander R, Fleming V (eds). London: Routledge; 2002

Burgess A, Alemanno A, Zinn J. Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies.London: Routledge; 2016

Donley J. Save the Midwife.Auckland: New Women Press, Auckland; 1986

Embo M, Valcke M. Continuing midwifery education beyond graduation: student midwives awareness of continuous professional development. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017; 24:118-22 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.08.013

Freidson E. Medical dominance.Chicago: Aldine-Atherton; 1970

Gopee N, Golloway J. Leadership and Management in Healthcare.London: SAGE; 2017

Hobbs JA. Newly qualified midwives transition to qualified status and role: assimilating the habitus or reshaping it?. Midwifery. 2012; 28:(3)391-9 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.04.007

Hughes A, Fraser D. Sink or swim: The experience of newly qualified midwives in England. Midwifery. 2011; 27:(3)382-6

Hunter LP. A hermeneutic phenomenological analysis of midwives ways of knowing during childbirth. Midwifery. 2008; 24:(4)405-15 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.06.001

Hunter B. ‘Mixed messages’: midwives' experiences of managing emotion. In: Hunter B, Deery R (eds). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009

Johanson R, Newburn M, Macfarlane A. Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far?. BMJ. 2002; 324:(7342)892-5 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892

Larson M. The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis.London: University of California Press; 1977

Lucas U, Tan PL. Developing a capacity to engage in critical reflection: students ways of knowing within an undergraduate business and accounting programme. Stud High Educ. 2013; 38:(1)104-23 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.569706

Megginson D, Whitaker V. Continuing Professional Development, 2nd edn. London: The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development; 2017

Standards for pre-registration midwifery education.London: NMC; 2009

NHS Digital. Hospital Maternity Activity 2015-16. 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/hospital-maternity-activity-2015-to-2016 (accessed 29 August 2017)

Papastavrou E, Lambrinou E, Tsangari H, Saarikoski M, Leino-Kilpi H. Student nurses experience of learning in the clinical environment. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010; 10:(3)176-82 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.07.003

The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.Gloucester: QAA; 2001

Open University. The critical thinking stairway. 2013. https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/viewpost.php?post=178090 (accessed 29th August 2017)

Reynolds EK, Cluett E, Le-May A. Fairy tale midwifery—fact or fiction: The lived experiences of newly qualified midwives. British Journal of Midwifery. 2014; 22:(9)660-8 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2014.22.9.660

Royal College of Midwives. Socioeconomic value of the midwife: A systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis and economic analysis of midwife-led models of care. 2010. https://www.rcm.org.uk/sites/default/files/Socioeconomic%20A4%20Report%2005%20FINAL%20040511.pdf (accessed 29 August 2017)

Rushton A, Lindsay G. Defining the construct of Masters level clinical practice in healthcare based on the UK experience. Med Teach. 2008; 30:(4)e100-7 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590801929950

Scamell M. The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: a tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociol Health Illn. 2011; 33:(7)987-1001 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01366.x

Scamell M. Childbirth within the risk society. Soc Compass. 2014; 8:(7)917-28 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12077

Scamell M. The fear factor of risk—clinical governance and midwifery talk and practice in the UK. Midwifery. 2016; 38:14-20 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.010

Scamell M, Alaszewski A. Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health Risk Soc. 2012; 14:(2)207-21 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2012.661041

Spendlove Z. Risk and boundary work in contemporary maternity care: tensions and consequences. Health Risk Soc. 2017; 1-18 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2017.1398820

An evidence-based strategy for midwifery education. 2007. https://www.rcm.org.uk/learning-and-career/learning-and-research/ebm-articles/an-evidence-based-strategy-for-midwifery (accessed 23 December 2017)

Witz A. Professions and patriarchy.London: Routledge; 1992

The personal and professional importance of post-registration postgraduate education

02 February 2018
Volume 26 · Issue 2

Abstract

The nature of both pre-registration and post-registration midwifery education has changed dramatically over the last two decades, being firmly established within academia and the higher education domain. Notwithstanding the changes to midwifery education, midwives' perceptions of post-registration education, and continual professional development in particular, are mixed. The terms professional training and post-registration education are used interchangeably despite representing different goals. This article will explore professional perceptions of the post-registration educational journey, the concept of further academic development for individual midwives through postgraduate study and how engagement of midwives in postgraduate study could benefit both individual midwives and the collective profession of midwifery.

The structure of midwifery education in the UK has changed dramatically over the last two decades, moving away from a predominantly practice-based apprenticeship model in a clinical setting, to being firmly established within academia and higher education (Thomas, 2007). The minimum academic level required to be registered as a midwife has also been raised, from a higher diploma to undergraduate degree level (Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2009). Successful students are awarded a Bachelor of Science (BSc) (Hons) in Midwifery and the professional qualification of Registered Midwife, having been judged by the Lead Midwife for Education to be fit to practise safely and effectively, and having demonstrated sound theoretical knowledge of midwifery.

Post-registration, midwives take control of their own learning and development by engaging in continuing professional development, an ongoing process of reflection and action. The requirement for continued learning post-registration is supported by revalidation, a process that all midwives in the UK must undergo in order to maintain their registration with the NMC. Part of revalidation is the requirement for midwives to undertake 35 hours of continuous professional development relevant to their scope of practice; and as a result, the level of academic study for post-registration postgraduate education has been raised to Master's (MSc) level. As a form of continuous professional development, a Master's degree is described as a second-cycle taught course, commonly taken by individuals who have an Honours degree or equivalent (Judge et al, 2005). Master's level education enables individuals to apply knowledge, to develop an understanding of how boundaries are advanced through research, and to manage complex issues systematically with self-direction, creativity and originality (Rushton and Lindsay, 2008). This article will explore the concept of postgraduate education for post-registration midwives from an individual perspective, as well as from the collective perspective of midwifery as a profession.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month