References

What makes a top hospital?. 2014. http://www.chks.co.uk/m/userfiles/files/CHKS_2014_WMATH_8_INTRO_R3.pdf (accessed 11 September 2017)

Gender differences in career choice influences. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York. 2007. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~awmeade/Links/Papers/IRT_Med_career(SIOP07).pdf (accessed 25 September 2017)

Nursing & Midwifery in Britain since 1700. In: Borsay B, Hunter B (eds). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012

Buchanan DA, Denyer D, Jaina J Chapter 5: The realities of middle management.: Health Services and Delivery Research; 2013

Campbell R, Macfarlane A Where to be born? The debate and the Evidence, 2nd edn. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford University Press; 1994

Chief Nursing Officers of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Midwifery 2020. 2010. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/midwifery-2020-delivering-expectations (accessed 25 September 2017)

Strengthening midwifery leadership. 2005. http://www.rcm.org.uk/midwives/features/strengthening-midwifery-leadership/ (accessed 25 September 2017)

Cowell B, Wainwright D Behind the blue door: the history of the Royal College of Midwives, 1881–1981.London: Balliere Tindall; 1981

de Beauvoir S The Second Sex.London: Vintage Books; 1949

Report of the Committee on Nursing.London: The Stationery Office; 1972

Donnison J Midwives and Medical Men: A History of the Struggle for the Control of Childbirth, 2nd edn. London: Historical Publications; 1988

Drife J The start of life: a history of obstetrics. Postgrad Med J. 2002; 78:(919)311-5

Ehrenreich B, English D Witches, Midwives, and Nurses.New York, NY: The Feminist Press; 1973

Francis R Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Enquiry.London: The Stationery Office; 2013

Baby boy's death at Oldham Royal maternity unit was preventable, says coroner. 2016. http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/baby-boys-death-oldham-royal-10987753 (accessed 3 October 2016)

Hague D IHSM Presidential Address 1985. Hosp Health Serv Rev. 1985; 81:(4)182-6

Handy C, Gordon C, Gow I, Randlesome C Making Managers.London: Financial Times Prentice Hall; 1988

Midwives agree to drop ‘normal births’ campaign as it makes women ‘feel like failures’. 2017. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/12/midwives-agree-drop-normal-births-campaign-makes-women-feel/ (accessed 12 September 2017)

Harrison S, Pollitt C Controlling Health professionals; The future of work and Organisation in the National Health service.Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994

Healthcare Commission. Towards better births: A review of maternity services in England. 2008. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101110155714/http://www.cqc.org.uk/_db/_documents/Towards_better_births_200807221338.pdf (accessed 25 September 2017)

Hughes D, Deery R, Lovatt A A critical ethnographic approach to facilitating cultural shift in midwifery. Midwifery. 2002; 18:(1)43-52 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2002.0293

Johnson G, Dale P Leading the Way. Midwives. 2011; 14:(3)40-1

The Future of Leadership and Management in the NHS: No more heroes.London: King's Fund; 2011

Kirkup B The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation.London: The Stationery Office; 2015

Lewis EA, Fagenson EA Strategies for developing women managers: how well do they fulfil their objectives?. Journal of Management Development. 1995; 14:(2)39-53

Loudon I General practitioners and obstetrics: a brief history. J R Soc Med. 2008; 101:(11)531-5 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2008.080264

Lloyd C Protecting maternity services. Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2015; 22:(2) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.22.2.14.s14

Mathipa ER, Tsoka EM Possible barriers to the advancement of women to leadership positions in the education profession. South African Journal of Education. 2001; 21:(4)324-31

Government confirms midwifery supervision removal to go ahead, despite objections. 2017. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/professional-regulation/midwifery-supervision-removal-to-go-ahead-despite-objections/7014784.article (accessed 11 September 2017)

Miller K, Clark D ‘Knife before wife’: an exploratory study of gender and the UK medical profession. J Health Organ Manag. 2008; 22:(3)238-53 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260810883521

National Maternity Review. Better Births: Improving outcomes of maternity services in England—A Five Year Forward View for maternity care. 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/national-maternity-review-report.pdf (accessed 28 July 2016)

O'Connell R, Downe S A metasynthesis of midwives' experience of hospital practice in publicly funded settings: compliance, resistance and authenticity. Health (London). 2009; 13:(6)589-609 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459308341439

O'Sullivan J Two Hundred years of Midwifery 1806-2006. Ulster Med J. 2006; 75:(3)213-22

Pashley G Management and leadership in Midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery. 1998; 6:(7)460-4

Porter S Women in a women's job: the gendered experience of nurses. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1992; 4:(4)510-27

Salmon B Report of the Committee on senior nursing staff structure.London: The Stationery Office; 1966

Sambrook S Critical pedagogy in health service management development programme, Can ‘critical thinking’ managers change the NHS management culture?. J Health Organ Manag. 2009; 23:(6)656-71 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260911001662

Smith A, Dixon A Health care professionals' views about safety in maternity services.London: The Kings Fund; 2008

Sweet BR Mayes' Midwifery: A Textbook for Midwives, 11th edn. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1988

Veale C, Gold J Smashing into the glass ceiling for women managers. Journal of Management Development. 1998; 17:(1)17-26

Walsh D The challenge of interdisciplinary collaboration: midwifery needs a model. British Journal of Midwifery. 2006; 14:(9)

Warwick C Leadership in Maternity Services.London: The Health Foundation; 2015

Weyer B Twenty years later: explaining the persistence of the glass ceiling for women leaders. Women in Management Review. 2007; 22:(6)482-96 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09649420710778718

Whitney R National Health Crisis, A Modern Solution.London: Shepheard-Walwyn Ltd; 1988

Worth J Call the Midwife.London: Merton Books; 2002

A review of midwifery leadership

02 October 2017
14 min read
Volume 25 · Issue 10

Abstract

Despite frequent reports criticising leadership skills in the profession, midwives have dedicated many years to increasing representation at the highest level. Elizabeth Maria Bannon, Fiona Alderdice and Jennifer McNeill explore the many decades of progress

The ineffectiveness of leadership across maternity services in England has been a recurrent theme over a number of years, with reports continuing to identify the same issues. These reports reflect the concerns previously identified by the Healthcare Commission in its review of maternity services in England, which drew attention to the links between poor morale and ineffective or authoritarian leadership, as well as highlighting the overemphasis on financial pressures, all of which were concluded to be detrimental to the care provided for women. This article will explore the history of midwifery leadership, examining the reasons why midwives in particular have been perceived as failing to have developed the necessary skills to lead and manage maternity services.

Manchester coroner Lisa Hashmi identified ‘poor midwifery leadership and staffing levels as well as ambiguities in the Trust's guidelines’ (Gray, 2016) as key factors in the death of a newborn baby when reviewing the case. These concerns are reflective of the findings in numerous reports into maternity services in England (Healthcare Commission, 2008; Francis, 2013; Kirkup, 2015; National Maternity Review, 2016). In a review of maternity services, the Healthcare Commission (2008) specifically linked poor morale; ineffective, domineering leadership styles; and an overemphasis on financial pressures with poorer care for women. Midwife managers in particular have been perceived as lacking the necessary skills to lead and manage the maternity services, thereby impacting on the quality of care delivered (Smith and Dixon, 2008). While there has been progress in improving maternity outcomes, Amess and Tyndale-Biscoe (2014) have reported that outcomes and quality of care remain inconsistent for women across all Trusts in England, with an 80% rise in maternity claims over the last 5 years.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month