References

Alfaro Blazquez R, Corchon S, Ferrer Ferrandiz E. Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Midwifery. 2017; 55:103-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014

Baxter J. An exploration of reasons why some women may leave the birth experience with emotional distress. British Journal of Midwifery. 2020; 28:(1) https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2020.28.1.24

Bergendahl S, Lindberg P, Brismar Wendel S. Operator experience affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum extraction deliveries. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019; 98:787-794 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13538

Breman RB, Storr CL, Paul J, LeClair M, Johantgen M. Women's prenatal and labor experiences in a hospital with an early-labor lounge. Nursing for Women's Health. 2019; 23:299-308 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2019.05.005

Çalik KY, Karabulutlu Ö, Yavuz C. First do no harm – interventions during labor and maternal satisfaction: a descriptive cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2054-0

Conrad M, Stricker S. Personality and labor: a retrospective study of the relationship between personality traits and birthing experiences. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2018; 36:(1)67-80 https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1397611

Cook K, Loomis C. The impact of choice and control on women's childbirth experiences. Journal of Perinatal Education. 2012; 21:(3)158-168 https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.21.3.158

Dannenbring D, Stevens MJ, House AE. Predictors of childbirth pain and maternal satisfaction. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1997; 20:127-142 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025526610524

Deliktas Demirci A, Kabukcuglu K, Haugan G, Aune I. ‘I want a birth without interventions’: Women's childbirth experiences from Turkey. Women and Birth. 2019; 32:e515-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.011

Dev A, Kivland C, Faustin M, Turnier O, Bell T, Leger MD. Perceptions of isolation during facility births in Haiti – a qualitative study. Reproductive Health. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0843-1

Medical data models. 2019. https://medical-data-models.org/29452 (accessed 4 March 2020)

Fleming SE, Donovan-Batson C, Burduli E, Barbosa-Leiker C, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Birth Satisfaction Scale/Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS/BSS-R): a large scale United States planned home birth and birth centre survey. Midwifery. 2016; 41:9-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.008

Fumagalli S, Colciago E, Antolini L, Riva A, Nespoli A, Locatelli A. Variables related to maternal satisfaction with intrapartum care in Northern Italy. Women and Birth. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.012

Göncü Serhatlıoglu S, Karahan N, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Construct and content validity of the Turkish Birth Satisfaction Scale–Revised (T-BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2018; 36:235-245 https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1443322

Hall PJ, Foster JW, Yount KM, Jennings BM. Comfort in labor: ‘like being able to exhale’. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nurs. 2020; 34:(1)38-45 https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000455

Hamm RF, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. Risk factors and racial disparities related to low maternal birth satisfaction with labor induction: a prospective, cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2658-z

Heatley ML, Watson B, Gallois C, Miller YD. Women's perceptions of communication in pregnancy and childbirth: influences on participation and satisfaction with care. Journal of Health Communication. 2015; 20:827-834 https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018587

Hinic K. Predictors of breastfeeding confidence in the early postpartum period. JOGNN. 2016; 45:(5)649-660 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.04.010

Hinic K. Understanding and promoting satisfaction in new mothers. MCN. 2017; 42:(4)210-215 https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000345

Hollins Martin CJ, Fleming V. The birth satisfaction scale. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2011; 24:(2)124-135 https://doi.org/10.1108/09526861111105086

Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014; 30:610-619 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006

Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. A survey of women's birth experiences in Scotland using the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS). European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare. 2015; 3 https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v3i4.1019

Hollins Martin CJ, Snowden A, Martin CR. Concurrent analysis: validation of the domains within the Birth Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2012; 30:(3)247-260 https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2012.710833

Howarth AM, Swain N, Treharne GJ. Taking personal responsibility for well-being increases birth satisfaction of first time mothers. Journal of Health Psychology. 2011; 16:(8)1221-1230 https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311403521

Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018; 36:(1)42-58 https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1396302

Johansson C, Finnbogadóttir H. First-time mothers' satisfaction with their birth experience – a cross-sectional study. Midwifery. 2019; 79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102540

Johnston RG, OstMed DO, Brown AE. Maternal trait personality and childbirth: the role of extraversion and neuroticism. Midwifery. 2013; 29:(11)1244-1250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.08.005

Kempe P, Vikström-Bolin M. Women's satisfaction with the birthing experience in relation to duration of labour, obstetric interventions and mode of birth. EJOG. 2020; 246:156-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.041

Konheim-Kalkstein YL, Miron-Shatz T. ‘If only I had…’: regrets from women with an unplanned cesarean delivery. Journal of Health Psychology. 2019; 3 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1359105319891543

Lee NJ, Neal J, Lowe NK, Kildea S V. Comparing different partograph designs for use in standard labor care: a pilot randomized trial. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2018; 22:(3)355-363 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2366-0

Luegmair K, Zenzmaier C, Oblasser C, König-Bachmann M. Women's satisfaction with care at the birthplace in Austria: evaluation of the babies born better survey national dataset. Midwifery. 2018; 59:130-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.003

Martin CR, Hollins Martin CJ, Burduli E, Barbosa-Leikerd C, Donovan-Batsone C, Fleming SE. Measurement and structural invariance of the US version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) in a large sample. Women and Birth. 2017a; 30:e172-e178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.11.006

Martin CR, Hollins Martin C, Redshaw M. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017b; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1459-5

McCrea BH, Wright ME. Satisfaction in childbirth and perceptions of personal control in pain relief during labour. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999; 29:(4)877-884 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00961.x

Mei JY, Afshar YR, Wong M, Gregory KD, Kilpatrick SJ, Esakoff TF. Birth experience satisfaction among birth plan mothers [5]. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 125 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000463523.05160.af

Miron-Shatz T, Konheim-Kalkstein YL. Preparedness and support, not personality, predict satisfaction in unplanned caesarean births. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020; 40:(2)171-175 https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1606174

Nespoli A, Colciago E, Pedroni S, Perego S, Fumagalli S. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R): process of translation and adaptation in an Italian context. Annali Dell'istituto Superiore di Sanita. 2018; 54:(4)340-347 https://doi.org/10.4415/ann_18_04_11

Nijagal MA, Wissig S, Stowell C, Olson E, Amer-Wahlin I, Bonsel G, Brooks A, Coleman M, Devi Karalasingam S, Duffy JMN, Flanagan T, Gebhardt S, Greene ME, Groenendaal F, Jeganathan JR, Kowaliw T, Lamain-de-Ruiter M, Main E, Owens M, Petersen R, Reiss I, Sakala C, Speciale AM, Thompson R, Okunade O, Franx A. Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal. BMC Health Services Research. 2018; 18:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3732-3

Omani-Samani R, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR, Maroufizadeh S. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): a validation study in Iranian mothers. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1651265

Rahimi-Kian F, Shahbazi S, Mohammadi S, Haghani S. The effects of ice pack application on pain intensity in the active phase of labor and on birth satisfaction among primiparous women. Nursing Practice Today. 2018; 5:(3)355-362

Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Cambil-Ledesmad A, Hollins Martine CJ, Martin CR. Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019; 70:31-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009

Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-108

Škodová Z, Nepelová Z, Grendár M, Bašková M. Psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019; 79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550

Skvirsky V, Taubman–Ben-Ari O, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Validation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale–Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2019; 38:(2)1-7 https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1600666

Staneva A. Childbirth in a technocratic age: the documentation of women's expectations and experiences. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2013; 31:(3)323-324 https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2013.784960

Turnbull D, Salter A, Simpson B, Mol BW, Chandraharan E, McPhee A, Symonds I, Benton M, Kuah S, Matthews G, Howard K, Wilkinson C. Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian randomised controlled trial (START). Trials. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9

Vardavaki Z, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Construct and content validity of the Greek version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (G-BSS). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2015; 33:488-503 https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2015.1035235

Measuring women's experiences of childbirth using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)

02 May 2020
9 min read
Volume 28 · Issue 5

Abstract

Birth satisfaction relates to women's perceptions of their childbirth experience, with importance placed on the midwife to improve standards of the intranatal care provided. With evaluating intranatal care in mind, this paper aims to educate midwives about one particular method of measuring women's experiences of labour, which involves using the valid and reliable Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). The BSS-R is a 10-item self-report valid and reliable measure, which is recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) as the ‘method of choice’ for evaluating women's ‘birth experience’. Since the ICHOM began recommending the BSS-R as part of its pregnancy and childbirth standard set, the scale (at time of print) has been used in 39 countries and 134 sites around the world.

The 10-item Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) is a multi-factorial psychometrically robust tool developed for the purpose of measuring women's experiences of labour and childbirth (Hollins Martin and Martin, 2014). The BSS-R is currently recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) as the lead international clinical tool for measuring women's experiences of labour and childbirth (Nijagal et al, 2018). Since the ICHOM began recommending the BSS-R, it has been used to measure women's ‘birth satisfaction’ in 39 countries and 134 sites worldwide (at the time of print).

The BSS-R is co-owned by Caroline J Hollins Martin (CJHM) and Colin R Martin (CRM) who are both available to provide advice regarding its use. Country specific BSS-R scales are held in an electronic site based at Edinburgh Napier University (ENU), with the ICHOM directing potential users to CJHM who monitors and maintains the site.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

  • Monthly email newsletter