References

DCP policy on supervision.Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2014

Capito C, Keegan C, Lachanudis L, Tyler J, McKellow C Professional midwifery advocates: delivering restorative clinical supervision. Nursing Times. 2022; 118:(2)26-28

Creedy DK, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, Pallant J, Fenwick J Prevalence of burnout, depression, anxiety and stress in Australian midwives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1212-5

Dixon L, Guilliland K, Pallant J The emotional wellbeing of New Zealand midwives: comparing responses for midwives in caseloading and shift work settings. New Z College Midwives J. 2017; 53:5-14 https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl53.2017.1.5-14

Goldberg DP, Hillier VF A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979; 9:(1)139-145 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644

Henriksen L, Lukasse M Burnout among Norwegian midwives and the contribution of personal and work-related factors: a cross-sectional study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016; 9:42-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2016.08.001

Hobfoll SE, Watson P, Bell CC Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention: empirical evidence. Psychiatry. 2007; 70:(4)283-315 https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2007.70.4.283

Hodkinson A, Zhou A, Johnson J Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022; 378 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070442

Professional quality of life measure: compassion, satisfaction, and fatigue version 5 (ProQOL). 2009. https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/dfc1e1a0-a1db-4456-9391-18746725179b/downloads/ProQOL_5_English.pdf?ver=1735595696788

Hunter B, Fenwick J, Sidebotham M, Henley J Midwives in the United Kingdom: levels of burnout, depression, anxiety and stress and associated predictors. Midwifery. 2019; 79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.008

Leinweber J, Rowe HJ The costs of ‘being with the woman’: secondary traumatic stress in midwifery. Midwifery. 2010; 26:(1)76-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.003

Leinweber J, Creedy DK, Rowe H, Gamble J Responses to birth trauma and prevalence of posttraumatic stress among Australian midwives. Women Birth. 2017; 30:(1)40-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.06.006

McGarry S, Girdler S, McDonald A Paediatric healthcare professionals: relationships between psychological distress, resilience and coping skills. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013; 49:(9)725-732 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12260

Findings, conclusions, and essential actions from the independent review of maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust. 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/624332fe8fa8f527744f0615/Final-Ockenden-Report-web-accessible.pdf

Rice H, Warland J Bearing witness: midwives experiences of witnessing traumatic birth. Midwifery. 2013; 29:(9)1056-1063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.003

Royal College of Midwives. RCM evidence to the NHS pay review body 2023 v4. 2023. https://pre.rcm.org.uk/media/6551/royal-college-of-midwives-nhsprbsubmission-2023-2024.pdf

Sheen K, Slade P, Spiby H An integrative review of the impact of indirect trauma exposure in health professionals and potential issues of salience for midwives. J Adv Nurs. 2014; 70:(4)729-743 https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12274

Sheen K, Spiby H, Slade P Exposure to traumatic perinatal experiences and posttraumatic stress symptoms in midwives: prevalence and association with burnout. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52:(2)578-587 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.006

Sheen K, Spiby H, Slade P What are the characteristics of perinatal events perceived to be traumatic by midwives?.. Midwifery. 2016; 40:55-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.007

Slade P, Sheen K, Collinge S, Butters J, Spiby H A programme for the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder in midwifery (POPPY): indications of effectiveness from a feasibility study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018; 9:(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1518069

A novel maternity clinical supervision service: overview and outcomes

02 March 2025
Volume 33 · Issue 3

Abstract

Background/Aims

Stress can lead to low work satisfaction and increased burnout, sickness/absence and staff turnover. A midwifery clinical supervision service was developed by two senior clinical psychologists and piloted. It aimed to offer clinical supervision and staff support to specialist groups of midwives.

Methods

Questionnaires were completed by 47 staff who attended the pilot service, assessing their experiences and psychological outcome measures at the first and last sessions. Paired sample two‑tailed t‑tests were used to test for differences between baseline and follow‑up scores for wellbeing measures. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data.

Results

Overall satisfaction was high, and attending multiple sessions significantly improved overall emotional wellbeing. Burnout was significantly lower, and there was a reduction in traumatic stress symptoms and improved rates of compassionate satisfaction.

Conclusions

Midwives and staff in maternity services value and benefit significantly from psychological support and specialist clinical supervision.

Implications for practice

Clinical supervision and staff support models should be provided in maternity services. This will directly impact the quality of care that staff provide.

Colleagues working in maternity services across the UK have experienced a range of challenging events over recent years, with implications for clinical governance and patient safety. This has had a significant impact on midwives, with the Royal College of Midwives (RCM, 2023) describing the current climate as a ‘midwifery workforce crisis’. Such challenges for maternity services are also reflected in the Ockenden (2022) report, and have been exacerbated by the pandemic, workforce shortages and the current cost of living crisis. National reports have published data from midwives stating that they feel exhausted, demoralised, unsupported and undervalued (RCM, 2023).

In addition to the challenging political and workforce climate for midwives, they are also at risk of exposure to traumatic situations at work, including exposure to patient death or near-death and other traumatic clinical adverse events. Midwives may be exposed to traumatic responses from those they are caring for (Leinweber and Rowe, 2010; Rice and Warland, 2013). The risk of moral injury is high, given the levels of pain and discomfort that some women and birthing people may experience to safely deliver their babies. Furthermore, midwives are required to hold a lot of uncertainty regarding clinical outcomes for the birthing person and their babies, especially for those with high-risk pregnancies.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month