References

Collington V, Hunt SC. Reflection in and midwifery education and practice: an exploratory analysis. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2006; 4:(3)

Managing attrition rates for student nurses and midwives: a guide to good practice for strategic health authorities and higher education institutions.London: Department of Health; 2006

Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics.London: Sage Publishing; 2017

Grant L, Kinman G. Emotional resilience in the helping professions and how it can be enhanced. Health and Social Care Education. 2014; 3:(1)23-33 https://doi.org/10.11120/hsce.2014.00040

Green S, Baird K. An exploratory, comparative study investigating attrition and retention of student midwives. Midwifery. 2009; 25:(10)79-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.09.002

Hunter B, Warren L. Investigating resilience in midwifery final report.London: RCM/Cardiff University; 2013

Hunter B, Warren L. Midwives' experiences of workplace resilience. Midwifery. 2014; 30:(8)926-934 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.010

International Confederation of Midwives. ICM definitions. 2017. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/our-work/policy-and-practice/icm-definitions.html (accessed 31 December 2021)

Lovegrove MJ. Reducing pre-registration attrition and improving retention (RePAIR).England: Health Education England; 2018

McGillivray CJ, Pidgeon A. Resilience attributes among university students: a comparative study of psychological distress, sleep disturbances and mindfulness. European Scientific Journal. 2015; 11:(5)33-48

NHS. Compassion in practice. nursing and midwifery and care staff our vision and strategy December. 2012. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/compassion-in-practice.pdf (accessed 19 September 2021)

The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives.London: NMC; 2015

The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives.London: NMC; 2018

Rittel HWJ, Webber MM. Dilemma in a general theory planning. Policy Sciences. 1973; 4:155-169

Royal College of Midwives. How to become a midwife. 2018. https://www.rcm.org.uk/promoting/learning-careers/become-a-midwife/ (accessed 19 September 2021)

Sekaran U. Research methods for business: A skill building approach.New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006

Sullivan G, Artino AR. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 5:(4)541-542 https://doi.org/10.4300%2FJGME-5-4-18

Stewart A. Basic statistics and epidemiology: a practical guide.London: CRC Press; 2016

Taylor H, Reyes H. Self-efficacy and resilience in baccalaureate nursing students. Int J Nurse Educ Scholarship. 2012; 9:(1)1-13 https://doi.org/10.1515/1548-923x.2218

Tolmie A, Muijs D, McAteer E. Quantitative methods in educational and social research using SPSS.London: McGraw-Hill Education; 2011

Wagnild G. The resilience scale user's guide.Montana: Resilience Center; 2014

Wagnild G, Young H. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Measurement. 1993; 1:(2)165-178

Williams J, Lathlean J, Norman K. An exploration of the development of resilience in student midwives. Br J Midwifery. 2021; 29:(6)330-337 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2021.29.6.330

An exploration of the development of resilience in student midwives

02 April 2022
13 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 4

Abstract

Background

Resilience has been considered a key personal characteristic for a healthcare professional to be able to cope with the demands of their profession. There is a paucity of research that has considered resilience in midwifery and none has used a resilience scale over the length of the midwifery programme.

Methods

A resilience scale was used with one cohort of student midwives on five occasions throughout their midwifery programme.

Results

The mean across all of the five scale scores for the 15 participants was 122 (range of mean scores:92–135). The majority of participants (n=13) had average, moderate or moderately high resilience and all student midwives except one increased their resilience between the first and fifth completion of the scale.

Conclusions

The true resilience scale is a useful tool to use in midwifery undergraduate programmes to determine the development of resilience in student midwives. Importantly, the scale could be used at an early opportunity to identify any support needs.

Retention on midwifery undergraduate programmes could be termed the ‘wicked problem’, described originally by Rittel and Webber (1973), as there is no simple solution and the issue is so complex that it may never be completely addressed. The RePair (Reducing Pre-registration Attrition and Improving Retention) project reported that between the academic years of 2009/2010 and 2014/2015, the average attrition rate for midwifery students was 13.6%, with the highest rate being 15.9% and the lowest being 11.5% during that period (Lovegrove, 2018). Children's nursing was the only field that presented a lower attrition rate, with 13.0% being the average rate, 15.5% the highest and 9.9% the lowest.

It is very costly to lose a student midwife, not only to the Higher Education Institution but also to the NHS; however, there is little research into the multifactorial reasons why students leave the programme (Green and Baird, 2009) and how institutions try to manage the whole ‘basket of risk factors in a holistic way to achieve lower attrition rates’ (Department of Health, 2006). Lovegrove (2018) reported that financial worries were the key concern for healthcare students, as without long holidays of traditional university courses, there was limited opportunity to earn enough to support themselves. Additionally, the relentless workload and level of responsibility was also of great concern to healthcare students and a consideration in whether they can remain and complete their programme.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month