Cohen PR Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections: a review of epidemiology, clinical features, management, and prevention. Int J Derm. 2007; 46:(1)1-11

Coia JE, Duckworth GJ, Edwards DI, Farrington M, Fry C, Humphreys H, Mallaghan C, Tucker DR Guidelines for the control and prevention of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 63:S1-44

Dean A, Arner T, Sunki GAtlanta: CDC; 2011

London: DH; 2008

London: DH; 2014

Gray JW, Suviste J Three years' experience of screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in obstetrics. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 83:(1)61-3

London: DH; 2014

Otter JA, French GL Molecular epidemiology of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010; 10:(4)227-39

Otter JA, Tosas-Auguet O, Herdman MT Implications of targeted versus universal admission screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in a London hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2014; 87:(3)171-4

Rao G, Michalczyk P, Nayeem N, Walker G, Wigmore L Prevalence and risk factors for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in adult emergency admissions – a case for screening all patients?. J Hosp Infect. 2007; 66:(1)15-21

Sanford MD, Widmer AF, Bale MJ, Jones RN, Wenzel RP Efficient detection and long-term persistence of the carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 1994; 19:(6)1123-8

Zetola N, Francis JS, Nuermberger EL, Bishai WR Community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging threat. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005; 5:(5)275-86

Routine screening of women having caesarean section for MRSA: Ritual or rational?

02 August 2015
11 min read
Volume 23 · Issue 8


Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant global problem. One response to the growing threat of this organism has been the introduction of routine screening of patients before admission to hospital. In midwifery, this has been applied to those undergoing caesarean section, and although these women are at low-risk of hospital-associated MRSA, one rationale for continuing this policy could be that it identifies cases of community-associated MRSA. This audit was undertaken to determine local compliance with MRSA screening in the maternity setting, and the utility of routine screening in one London Hospital. The prevalence of MRSA was 2.8% in those having elective caesarean sections and 1.1% in emergency cases. Although staff generally understood the need for screening, significant barriers included consent, time and material constraints. Given the low prevalence and risk of severe infection in this generally healthy group; it is recommended that routine screening be stopped.

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (also known as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA) is a growing problem throughout the world, and although originally associated with hospitals and other healthcare facilities, it also has occured more recently in the community. Although transmission of hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) in the community has been documented many times, these community strains (CA-MRSA) are distinct from their healthcare-associated equivalents, being genotypically different and consequently having different resistance profiles and pathogenic sequelae; one particularly important difference being that CA-MRSA has historically been susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Thus any discussion of MRSA transmission needs to take account of two different threats: those of HA- and CA-MRSA.

There have been a number of responses to the threat posed by MRSA, including an emphasis on hospital cleanliness and hygiene, reducing the use of antimicrobials that produce a selective environment for the development and spread of resistance, and the screening of people being admitted to hospital to identify those carrying MRSA so that they can be isolated and treated, if necessary. While MRSA has historically been seen as predominantly a hospital organism, the discovery of distinct CA-MRSA organisms complicated matters greatly, because the risk factors for carriage of these strains are very different. HA-MRSA usually affects patients who are in healthcare or institutional settings or those who have been in hospital recently, whereas CA-MRSA is often associated with younger and healthier people; transmission of CA-MRSA has, for example, been associated with activities that result in skin-to-skin contact such as contact sports (Cohen, 2007). Consequently, while previous hospital admission is a major risk factor for HA-MRSA, it is less significant for CA-MRSA, and MRSA screening programmes that focus on this and other HA-MRSA risk factors such as older age and admission to high-risk specialities may fail to identify CA-MRSA strains.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month