References
Verbal feedback for written assessment: evaluating a novel feedback communication strategy
Abstract
Background/Aims
Feedback plays a pivotal role in learning, but traditional written feedback often lack engagement and specificity, hindering learners' ability to effectively apply feedback. In midwifery education, the need for innovative feedback delivery mechanisms is pronounced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the integration of digital health technologies in feedback delivery in a midwifery programme.
Methods
A novel communication strategy was implemented in a midwifery programme in northwest England, where the benefits, challenges and future implications of leveraging digital health technologies for assessment feedback were assessed.
Results
Preferences were mixed, with 45.1% of learners favouring written feedback. Verbal feedback was perceived as more personal and motivating, and valued for its nuance, tone and ability to clarify complex points, although written feedback provided clearer, detailed information for future reference. Less experienced markers struggled with verbal feedback, while more experienced markers appreciated the quicker, more refreshing process. All markers found feedback templates helpful for ensuring equitable feedback.
Conclusions
This study scrutinised the significance of rethinking feedback delivery in midwifery education and indicates that digital health technologies present promising opportunities for reshaping the feedback landscape.
Implications for practice
Developing student confidence and competence in digital literacy remains a significant challenge. Higher education institutions can collaborate with healthcare providers to offer training in digital health technologies, helping midwives adapt to modern clinical environments.
Feedback is defined as a process through which learners make sense of information from various sources and use it to enhance their work or learning strategies (Carless, 2015). Providing learners with feedback is an integral part of teaching and can have a powerful influence on student learning (Dowden et al, 2013). On midwifery programmes, feedback is continuous from practice supervisors and assessors (Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2023a), service users in clinical practice and theoretical assessments marked by academic educators. Feedback from practice experiences is often verbal, with accompanying written text from practice supervisors and service users in their midwifery ongoing record of achievement. Feedback from theoretical assessments includes formative and summative feedback, but this project focused on feedback for summative assessments.
There is a wide range of evidence from the national student surveys that suggests feedback is often rated lower than other aspects of teaching and learning (Killingback et al, 2019). Feedback is a critical component of the learning process, providing learners with valuable insights into their performance, identifying areas for improvement and promoting reflective practice. However, traditional methods of delivering feedback, such as written comments and face-to-face group discussions, often lack engagement and specificity, and may not effectively support learners in understanding and applying feedback to enhance their learning (Henderson et al, 2019). These methods can also be time consuming for lecturers and impersonal for the student.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Limited access to our clinical or professional articles
-
New content and clinical newsletter updates each month