Arigo D, Pagoto S, Carter-Harris L, Lillie SE, Nebeker C. Using social media for health research: methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digital Health. 2018; 4:1-15

Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ. Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly J Economics. 2015; 130:(1)165-218

Candido C, Thomas L, Haddad S, Zhang F, Mackey M, Ye W. Designing activity-based workspaces: satisfaction, productivity and physical activity. Build Res. 2019; 47:(3)275-289

Carolan C, Davies CL, Crookes P, McGhee S, Roxburgh M. COVID 19: disruptive impacts and transformative opportunities in undergraduate nurse education. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020; 46

Çevik AÇ. “Working at home and living at work, but….”: challenges of online/remote education for women's academics in Turkey. In: Neimann T, Felix JJ, Shliakhovchuk E, Hindman LL. Pennsylvania, US: IGI Global; 2022

Collins AM, Hislop D, Cartwright S. Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office-based colleagues and supervisors. New Technol Work Employ. 2016; 31:(2)161-175

Del Boca D, Oggero N, Profeta P, Rossi M. Women's and men's work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household. 2020; 18:(4)1001-1017

Dutta K. Pandemic-proof teaching: blended learning infrastructure to support a pivot to hybrid/online pedagogy. In: Singh U, Nair CS, Blewett C, Shea T (eds). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2022

Fetherston C, Fetherston A, Batt S, Sully M, Wei R. Wellbeing and work-life merge in Australian and UK academics. Stud Higher Educ. 2021; 46:(12)2774-2788

Gelinas L, Pierce R, Winkler S, Cohen IG, Lynch HF, Bierer BE. Using social media as a research recruitment tool: ethical issues and recommendations. Am J Bioethics. 2017; 17:(3)3-14

Gerding T, Syck M, Daniel D An assessment of ergonomic issues in the home offices of university employees sent home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Work. 2021; 1-12

Hampton S. An ethnography of energy demand and working from home: exploring the affective dimensions of social practice in the United Kingdom. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2017; 28:1-10

Haslam MB. What might COVID-19 have taught us about the delivery of nurse education, in a post-COVID-19 world?. Nurse Educ Today. 2021; 97

Haynes B, Suckley L, Nunnington N. Workplace productivity and office type: an evaluation of office occupier differences based on age and gender. J Corporate Real Estate. 2017; 19:(2)111-138

Idris F, Zulkipli IN, Abdul-Mumin KH Academic experiences, physical and mental health impact of COVID-19 pandemic on students and lecturers in health care education. BMC Medical Education. 2021; 21:(1)1-13

Kniffin KM, Narayanan J, Anseel F COVID-19 and the workplace: implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. Am Psychol. 2021; 76:(1)

Lal B, Dwivedi YK, Haag M. Working from home during covid-19: doing and managing technology-enabled social interaction with colleagues at a distance. Inf Syst Front. 2021; 1-18

Leigh J, Vasilica C, Dron R Redefining undergraduate nurse teaching during the coronavirus pandemic: use of digital technologies. Br J Nurs. 2020; 29:(10)566-569

Nakrošiene A, Buciuniene I, Goštautaite B. Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. Int J Manpower. 2019; 40:(1)87-101

Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017; 16:(1)

Pekyavas NÖ, Pekyavas E. Investigation of the pain and disability situation of the individuals working” home-office” at home at the covid-19 isolation process. Int J Disabil Sports Health Sci. 2020; 3:(2)100-104

Petriglieri G, Ashford SJ, Wrzesniewski A. Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Admin Sci Quarterly. 2019; 64:(1)124-170

Raišienė GA, Rapuano V, Varkulevičiūtė K, Stachová K. Working from home—who is happy? A survey of Lithuania's employees during the COVID-19 quarantine period. Sustainability. 2020; 12:(13)

Ren X, Caudle D. Walking the tightrope between work and non-work life: strategies employed by British and Chinese academics and their implications. Stud Higher Educ. 2016; 41:(4)599-618

Rimmer A. How can I feel less isolated from colleagues?. BMJ. 2020;

Rodriguez RM, Medak AJ, Baumann BM Academic emergency medicine physicians' anxiety levels, stressors, and potential stress mitigation measures during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Academic Emergency Med. 2020; 27:(8)700-707

Sato K, Kobayashi S, Yamaguchi M Working from home and dietary changes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study of health app (CALO mama) users. Appetite. 2020; 165

Sutherland KA. Work-life balance: exploring the myths and realities of family, home, work, and life pressures for early career academics.Switzerland: Springer; 2018

Tan W, Hao F, McIntyre RS Is returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic stressful? A study on immediate mental health status and psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures of Chinese workforce. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020; 87:84-92

Thompson RJ, Payne SC, Taylor AB. Applicant attraction to flexible work arrangements: separating the influence of flextime and flexplace. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2015; 88:(4)726-749

Van der Lippe T, Lippényi Z. Beyond formal access: Organizational context, working from home, and work–family conflict of men and women in European workplaces. Soc Indic Res. 2020; 151:(2)383-402

Wheatley D. Employee satisfaction and use of flexible working arrangements. Work, Employment and Society. 2017; 31:(4)567-585

Widar L, Wiitavaara B, Boman E, Heiden M. Psychophysiological reactivity, postures and movements among academic staff: a comparison between teleworking days and office days. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:(18)

Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic for midwifery and nursing academics

02 October 2022
Volume 30 · Issue 10



The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected teaching for nursing and midwifery academics, as it shifted from face-to-face to online teaching from home. However, their experiences and how this impacted their ability to fulfil their academic roles has not been reported. This study investigated midwifery and nursing academics' working from home experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and how this has impacted their ability to fulfil their academic roles.


A qualitative approach was used for this study, analysing demographics and the answers to open-ended questions from 91 midwifery and nursing academics.


Six themes were derived: isolation, loneliness, work rituals, productivity, blurred boundaries and health and wellbeing. Generally, participants reported that they were more organised, focused and efficient, which gave them more time to spend with their families and pets. Most thought that they were more productive at home. However, the working environments for some participants were not ideal, as they were working in their kitchen or dining area, or in ‘make-do’ offices.


The COVID-19 pandemic posed new working challenges for academics, many of whom had worked from home for a few days, but then needed to work from home for extended periods because of lockdowns. Academics reported an overall positive outlook for working from home, as it enabled more family time and more productivity.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a far-reaching impact on nursing and midwifery education and subsequently, the academics that provide teaching and learning. As a result of lockdowns being enforced in many cities worldwide, university campuses were required to close for academics and students, causing disruption to teaching and learning (Carolan et al, 2020). Globally, many nursing and midwifery academics embraced online theoretical teaching and learning from home in what had been a traditionally face-to-face learning environment (Haslam, 2021). Nursing and midwifery academics had previously worked from home for some days during their working week, primarily for research-based activities. However, there was a sudden shift to only working from home for extended periods of time because of the lockdowns. This involved learning about new technology and a major pivot in pedagogical approaches from face-to-face to distance learning, which are very differently constructed approaches, when delivering distance education in nursing and midwifery curriculums (Leigh et al, 2020).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month