Ten top tips for what women want from their midwives. Essentially MIDIRS. 2012; 3:(3)27-31

Bournemouth University. The PIER partnership. 2017. (accessed 24 July 2017)

Compassion in Practice—nursing, midwifery and care staff—our vision and strategy.London: DH; 2012

Downe S, McKeown M, Johnson E The UCLan community engagement and service user support (Comensus) project: valuing authenticity, making space for emergence. Health Expectations. 2007; 10:392-406

Driesens K, McLaughlin H, Van Doorn L. The meaningful involvement of service users in social work education: Examples from Belgium and the Netherlands. Social Work Education: the international journal. 2016; 35:(7)739-751

Grigsby S. Aroma: aromatherapy to reduce oxytocin use for maternal augmentation in labour. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2015; 7:679-88

Can patients be teachers? Involving patients and service users in healthcare professionals' education.London: The Health Foundation; 2011

Hughes M. What Difference Does it Make? Findings of an impact study of service user and carer involvement in social work students' subsequent practice. Journal of Social Work Education. 2016;

Hughes M. Enabling learners to think for themselves: Reflections on a community placement. International Journal of Social Work Education. 2013; 32:(2)213-229

Jay A. Parents, we need your views. Pract Midwife. 2012; 15:(8)38-40

Jha V, Quinton ND, Becker HI, Roberts TE. Strategies and interventions for the involvement of real patients in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2009; 43:(1)10-20

Long L. User involvement in student selection. Pract Midwife. 2010; 13:(10)26-7

Marsh W, Robinson A, Gallagher A, Shawe J. Removing babies from their mothers at birth: midwives' experiences. British Journal of Midwifery. 2014; 22:(9)620-4

Marsh W, Robinson A, Shawe J. Mothers' experiences of compulsory removal of babies at birth: a review of the evidence: Part 1. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2015; 25:(3)341-6

Marsh W, Shawe J, Robinson A, Leamon J. Moving pictures: including photo-elicitation into a narrative study of mothers and midwives experiences of babies removed at birth. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2016; 14:(2)44-8

Morgan A, Jones D. Perceptions of service user and carer involvement in healthcare education and impact on students' knowledge and practice: a literature review. Medical Teacher. 2009; 31:82-95

Muir D, Laxton JC. Experts by experience: the views of service user educators providing feedback on medical students' work based assessment. Nurse Educ Today. 2012; 32:(2)146-50

Standards for pre-registration midwifery education.London: NMC; 2009

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Education Framework: Standards for Education and Training for all UK providers of Nursing and Midwifery Education. Draft for consultation. 2017. (accessed 20 July 2017)

O'Donnell H, Gormley K. Service user involvement in nurse education: perceptions of mental health nursing students. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013; 20:(3)193-202

Stacy R, Spencer J. Patient as teachers: a qualitative study of patients' views on their role in a community-based undergraduate project. Medical Education. 1999; 33:(9)688-94

Tew J, Gell G, Foster S. Learning from experience involving service users and carer in mental health education and training: a good practice guide.Nottingham: Mental Health in Higher Education; 2004

Tew J, Holley T, Caplen P. Dialogue and challenge: involving service users and carers in small group learning with social work and nursing students. Social Work Education. 2012; 31:(3)316-30

Todres L, Galvin K, Holloway I. The humanization of healthcare: A value framework for qualitative research. International Journal Of Qualitative Studies On Health and Well-Being. 2009; 4:(2)68-77

Turnbull P, Weeley FM. Service user involvement: inspiring student nurses to make a difference to patient care. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013; 13:454-458

Walters K, Buszewicz M, Russell J, Humphrey C. Teaching as therapy: cross sectional and qualitative evaluation of patients' experiences of undergraduate psychiatry teaching in the community. BMJ. 2003; 326:(7392)

Webber M, Robinson K. 2012The Meaningful involvement of service users and carers in advanced level post qualifying social work education: a qualitative study. British Journal of Social Work. 2012; 42:(7)1256-74

Involvement in midwifery education: Experiences from a service user and carer partnership

02 August 2017
Volume 25 · Issue 8


This article provides a critical reflection on the experiences of the Bournemouth University Public Involvement in Education and Research (PIER) partnership in developing approaches to involving service users and user groups within midwifery programmes of education; an NMC requirement since 2009. Specific models and activities are explored, including using social media to consult with expectant and new parents; organising direct conversations between women, their families, academics and students to explore experiences such as grief and loss and the use of support networks during pregnancy; and developing digital resources to create real, in depth and meaningful case studies.

Three key benefits to having meaningful and well supported involvement are identified: emotional impact and the opportunity to develop insight and resilience; knowledge impact and the opportunity to better understand the application of theory; and practical impact, which can lead to tangible changes to students' subsequent practice.

The Public Involvement in Education and Research (PIER) partnership was established in 2004 within a qualifying social work programme at Bournemouth University. In 2011, it was then extended across the Faculty of Health and Social Sciences. The partnership employs two service user and carer coordinators and has more than 90 members who are experts by experience and who contribute across the faculty to the design and delivery of lectures, assessment panels, role plays and simulation, admissions, curriculum design and research. Over a typical year, we coordinate more than 900 contact hours between students and service users in addition to the direct contact that students have in placement settings.

Involving women in midwifery education, however, has been a challenge. Time can be particularly precious to expectant and new mothers. Childcare responsibilities often preclude parents from attending university settings to contribute to the design and delivery of a programme or to participate in interview panels and, by their very nature, expectant and new mothers are a transient group in terms of their recent experience of using maternity services. There is little existing literature from the midwifery field that shares and evaluates the impact of different models of involvement on students' learning and subsequent practice, or the impact of ways of overcoming these challenges.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month