Anderson V, Chaboyer W, Gillespie B The relationship between obesity and surgical site infections in women undergoing CS: an integrative review. Midwifery. 2013; 29:(12)1331-8

Boyle M Caesarean section wound management: a midwives challenge. Pract Midwife. 2001; 4:(2)20-2

Brunero S, Lamont S The ‘difficult’ nurse-patient relationship: Development and evaluation of an e-learning package. Contemp Nurse. 2010; 35:(2)136-46

Cardoso del Monte M, Pinto Neto A Postdischarge surveillance following CS: the incidence of SSI and associated factors. American Journal of Infection Control. 2010; 38:467-72

Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G Saving Mother's Lives: The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into maternal deaths in the UK. BJOG. 2011; 118:1-203

Desai N, Philpott-Howard J, Wade J, Casewell M Infection control training: evaluation of a computer-assisted learning package. J Hosp Infect. 2000; 44:193-9

DeSilets LD Needs assessments. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2006; 37:(4)148-9

DeSilets LD Needs assessments: An array of Possibilities. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2007; 38:(3)107-12

Dyrkorn OA, Kristoffersen M, Walberg M Reducing post-caesarean surgical wound infection rate: an improvement project in a Norwegian maternity clinic. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21:(3)206-10

Enohumah K, Corcoran S, Loughrey J Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2011; 20:s1-s55

Francis RLondon: HMSO; 2013

Health and Social Care Information Centre. Maternity Statistics. 2015. (accessed 10 May 2015)

Jazwiec R Learning needs assessment: concepts and process. Journal of Nursing Staff Development. 1991; 91-5

Lymn JS, Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad HJ Pharmacology education for nurse prescribing students – a lesson in reusable learning objects. BMC Nursing. 2008; 7:(2)1-11

McGiveron A, Foster S, Pearce J, Taylor M, McMullen S, Langley-Evans S Limiting antenatal weight gain improves maternal health outcomes in severely obese pregnant women: findings of a pragmatic evaluation of a midwife-led intervention. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015; 28:29-37

Caesarean section guideline CG132.London: NICE; 2011

Quality standard for caesarean section.London: NICE; 2013

Nobbs S, Crozier K Wound management in obese women following CS. British Journal of Midwifery. 2011; 19:(3)150-6

London: NMC; 2015

O'Neill E, Stevens NT, Clarke E, Cox P, O'Malley B, Humphreys H Use of e-learning to enhance medical students understanding and knowledge of healthcare-associated infection prevention and control. J Hosp Infect. 2011; 79:(4)368-70

Preston E, Ada L, Dean CM, Stanton R, Waddington G, Canning C The Physiotherapy eskills training online resource improves performance of practical skills: a controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12

Ramires de Jesus G, Ramires de Jesus N, Peixoto-Filho F, Lobato G Caesarean rates in Brazil: what is involved?. BJOG. 2015; 122:606-9

Reilly J, Allardice G, Bruce J, Hill R, McCoubrey J Procedure specific SSI rates and post discharge surveillance in Scotland. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27:(12)1318-23

Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, Cottrell D A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture. Med Educ. 2001; 35:(9)847-54

Wloch C, Wilson J, Lamagni T, Harrington P, Charlett A, Sheridan E Risk factors for SSI following CS in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. BJOG. 2012; 119:(11)1324-33

WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.Geneva: WHO; 2015

Do midwives see caesarean section wound care education as a need?

02 June 2015
10 min read
Volume 23 · Issue 6


With the current caesarean section (CS) rate at 25% for England, delivering postnatal wound care is a common element of the midwife's role. Anecdotal evidence suggested CS wound care education was a need within the Trust's midwifery service. A questionnaire was used to investigate midwives' views and the need for education in relation to CS wound care. The results confirm midwives do see wound care education as a need. For the first time, information is available on the topics midwives feel should be the focus of such education and useful methods of delivering it. This information can be used to develop a wound care education package to address midwives' learning needs in this area.

Despite recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) that the ideal rate for caesarean sections (CS) should be between 10 and 15%, the CS rate in the UK has not reduced in recent years and remains at 25% (Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2015; WHO, 2015), with Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust's rate comparable at 24%. As the main provider of postnatal care, the midwife is responsible for delivering wound care to these women. This care comprises both action and advice to prevent surgical site infections (SSI) and care within professional boundaries in the event of a SSI occurring. SSI is a risk with any surgical procedure, although the risk is acknowledged to be greater with certain procedures, such as vascular and cardiac surgery (Reilly et al, 2006). CS has typically been viewed to be a low-risk procedure due to the younger age and perceived good health status of patients. However, due to health-care advances, many women are now having children who would previously have been unable to due to pre-existing conditions (Anderson et al, 2013; McGiveron, 2015). The altering health status of the pregnant population requires us to reconsider the importance of wound care and the risk of SSI in this group.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month