References

Adhikari NKJ Patient safety without borders: measuring the global burden of adverse events. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2013; 22:(10)798-801 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002396

Amirchetty SR, Rutherford J Prioritization in the labour suite. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine. 2008; 18:(6)150-154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2008.04.002

Bhabra G, Mackeith S, Monteiro P, Pothier D An experimental comparison of handover methods. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2007; 89:(3)298-300 https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X168352

Bick D Media portrayal of birth and the consequences of misinformation. Midwifery. 2010; 26:(2)147-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.02.002

Brindley P, Reynolds S Improving verbal communication in critical care medicine. Journal of Critical Care. 2011; 26:(2)155-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.03.004

Safe handover: safe patients.London: BMA; 2004

Bruton J, Norton C, Smyth N, Ward H, Day S Nurse handover: patient and staff experiences. British Journal of Nursing. 2016; 25:(7)386-393 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.7.386

Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. BMJ Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010; 19:493e-e497

de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2008; (17)216-223 https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.023622

Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo O, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13:(4) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197791

Foster S, Manser T The effects of patient handoff characteristics on subsequent care: a systematic review and areas for future research. Academic Medicine. 2012; 87:(8)1105-1124 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825cfa69

Gaba DM Structural and organizational issues in patient safety: a comparison of health care to other high-hazard industries. California Management Review. 2000; 43:(1)83-102 https://doi.org/10.2307/41166067

Haider J, Guimicheva B, Gosh S, Hamid R, Penna L, Sarris I Evaluation of healthcare professionals' understanding of eponymous maneuvers and mnemonics in emergency obstetric care provision. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014; 125:(3)228-231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.12.011

Hatten-Masterson SJ, Griffiths ML SHARED maternity care: enhancing clinical communication in a private maternity hospital setting. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2009; 190:(11)S150-S151 https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02624.x

Hilligoss B, Moffatt-Bruce SD The limits of checklists: handoff and narrative thinking. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2014; 23:(7) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002705

Hogan H, Healey F, Neale G, Thomson R, Vincent C, Black N Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review study. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2012; 21:(9)737-745 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-001159

Hunt S, Symonds A The social meaning of midwifery.London: Macmillan; 1995

Kapadia SA, Addison CE Developing clinical handover: what does the literature suggest?. The International Journal of Clinical Leadership. 2012; 17:(3)119-122

Kapur N, Parand A, Soukup T, Reader T, Sevdalis N Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety. JRSM Open. 2016; 0:(0)1-10 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2054270415616548

Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation. 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/408480/47487_MBI_Accessible_v0.1.pdf (accessed 25 February 2020)

To err is human. Building a safer healthcare system. In: Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M (eds). Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine National Academy Press; 2000

Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004; 13:(S1)i85-i90

Why Mothers die 2000–2002. The sixth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. 2004. https://elearning.rcog.org.uk//sites/default/files/Gynaecological%20emergencies/CEMACH_Why_Mothers_Die_00-02_2004.pdf (accessed 25 February 2020)

Saving mothers' lives, 2003–2005. 2007. https://www.publichealth.hscni.net/sites/default/files/Saving%20Mothers%27%20Lives%202003-05%20.pdf (accessed 25 February 2020)

Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–08. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. 2011. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x/pdf

Luce A, Cash M, Hundley V, Cheyne H, van Teijlingen E, Angell C ‘Is it realistic?’ the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016; 16:(40) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0827-x

Manjunath A, Srirangam S Risks of working time directive: shorter shifts and more frequent handover. BMJ. 2010; 341:48-58 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4858

Manser T, Foster S Effective handover communication: an overview of research and improvement efforts. Best Practice and Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2011; 25:(2)181-191 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2011.02.006

Moore S The European HANDOVER project: the role of nursing. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2012; 21:i16-i18 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001253

NHS Resolution. Annual report and accounts 2017/18. 2018. https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NHS-Resolution-Annual-Report-2017-2018.pdf (accessed 25 February 2020)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chapter 32 structured patient handovers: emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation. 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng94/evidence/32structured-patient-handovers-pdf-172397464671 (accessed 25 February 2020)

Safe births: everybody's business. 2008. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/safe-births-everybodys-business (accessed 25 February 2020)

Ong MS, Coiera E A systematic review of failures in handoff communication during intrahospital transfers. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2011; (37)247-284 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(11)37035-3

Ottewill M, Urben J, Elson D Safe hand-over: safe care. Midwives. 2007; 10:(11)508-509

Patterson E Structuring flexibility: the potential good, bad and ugly in standardisation of handovers. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2008; 17:(1)4-5 https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.022772

Poot EP, de Bruijne MC, Wouters MGAJ, de Groot CJM, Wagner C Exploring perinatal shift-to-shift handover communication and process: an observational study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2013; 20:(2)166-175 https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12103

Rabøl LI, Andersen ML, Østergaard D, Bjørn B, Lilja B, Mogensen T Descriptions of verbal communication errors between staff. An analysis of 84 root cause analysis-reports from Danish hospitals. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2011; 20:(3)268-274 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040238

Raduma-Tomas MA, Flin R, Yule S, Williams D Doctors' handovers in hospitals: a literature review. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2011; 20:(2)128-133 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034389

Riesenberg L, Leitzsch J, Little B Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2009; 24:196-204 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1062860609332512

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Good practice no 10: labour ward solutions. 2010. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/labourwardsolutiongoodpractice10a.pdf

Rydenfält C, Ek Å, Larsson PA Safety checklist compliance and a false sense of safety: new directions for research. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2013; 23:(3)183-186

Russ S, Rout S, Sevdalis N, Moorthy K, Darzi A, Vincent C Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review. Annals of surgery. 2013; 25:(8)856-871 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000206

Scott P, Ross P, Prytherch D Evidence-based inpatient handovers: a literature review and research agenda. Clinical Governance: An International Journal. 2012; 17:(1)14-27 https://doi.org/10.1108/14777271211200710

Segall N, Bonifacio AS, Schroeder R, Barbeito A, Rogers D, Thornlow DK, Emery J, Kellum S, Wright MC, Mark JB Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2012; 11:(1)102-115 https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318253af4b

Sen R, Paterson-Brown S Prioritisation on the delivery suite. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine. 2005; 15:(4)228-236 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.curobgyn.2005.05.002

Shojania KG, Thomas EJ Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving?. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2013; 22:(4)273-277 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001935

Siassakos D, Bristowe K, Draycott TJ, Angouri J, Hambly H, Winter C, Crofts JF, Hunt LP, Fox R Clinical efficiency in a simulated emergency and relationship to team behaviours: a multisite cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2011; 118:(5)596-607 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02843.x

Singh N On a wing and a prayer: surgeons learning from the aviation industry. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2009; 102:(9)360-364 https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2009.090139

Smeulers M, Lucas C, Vermeulen H Effectiveness of different nursing handover styles for ensuring continuity of information in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014; 24:(6) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009979.pub2

Spranzi F Clinical handover on labour ward: a narrative synthesis of the literature. British Journal of Midwifery. 2014; 22:(10)738-745 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2014.22.10.738

Symons NR, Wong HW, Manser T, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Moorthy K An observational study of teamwork skills in shift handover. International Journal of Surgery. 2012; 10:(7)355-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.010

ten Cate O, Young J The patient handover as an entrustable professional activity: adding meaning in teaching and practice. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2012; 21:(1)i9-i12 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001213

Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001; 322:517-519 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517

World Health Organization. 10 facts about patient safety. 2014. https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/patient_safety/en/ (accessed 25 February 2020)

Wright G, Kean L Prioritization on the labour suite. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine. 2011; 21:(10)292-296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2008.04.002

From handover to takeover: should we consider a new conceptual model of communication?

02 March 2020
Volume 28 · Issue 3

Abstract

Objective

This service evaluation aimed to collect data on clinical handover on labour ward and compare them with the local guideline.

Design and methods

This service evaluation was structured in four stages, each using a different design and research methods.

Setting

The study was undertaken between September 2013 and August 2014 in a maternity unit in a large NHS teaching hospital in London, UK.

Findings and conclusion

Communication breakdown is widely considered to be a significant factor contributing to poor patient outcomes, with handover being a major risk point. The discrepancy between the local guideline and current clinical practice reinforces the belief that urgent action is needed to improve clinical handover on labour ward. The results of this service evaluation suggest that a drastic overhaul of the communication model during handover should be considered, ie from handover to takeover, and that the mnemonic SBAR may not be fit-for-purpose in maternity care and should be replaced with a different format that reflects the chronological flow of clinical events.

Clinical handover has long been an important topic among both clinicians and academics interested and involved in patient safety in healthcare. It is widely recognised that clinical handover represents a vital, yet vulnerable, link in the chain, ensuring continuity of care for all patients during their hospital stay (Ong and Coiera, 2011; Scott et al, 2012; ten Cate and Young, 2012; Moore, 2012).

Extensive knowledge has also been imported from other high-risk industries, such as aviation, nuclear power and the armed forces, and adapted for use within healthcare settings (Gaba, 2000; Singh, 2009; Kapur et al, 2016). However, to date, very little is known about what can be considered to be best evidence-based practice in clinical handover on labour ward (Spranzi, 2014). Childbirth is a unique event in life. In the UK, childbirth is expected to have a positive outcome, both for mother and infant. Overall, the provision of maternity care in the UK is considered of an excellent standard. Current figures for England and Wales show neonatal mortality rate at 2.7 per 1 000 live births (Office for National Statistics, 2018). Some of these deaths may be unavoidable; however, some may be preventable.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month