References

Alder J, Stadlmayr W, Tschudin S, Bitzer J Post-traumatic symptoms after childbirth: What should we offer?. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 27:(2)107-112 https://doi.org10.1080/01674820600714632

Beck CT, Driscoll JW, Watson SAbingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2013

Canfield D, Silver RM Detection and prevention of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder: a call to action. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 136:(5)1030-1035 https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004093

Cherguit J, Burns J, Pettle S, Tasker F Lesbian co-mothers’ experiences of maternity healthcare services. J Adv Nurs. 2013; 69:(6)1269-1278 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06115.x

Dahl B, Fylkesnes AM, Sörlie V, Malterud K Lesbian women's experiences with healthcare providers in the birthing context: a meta-ethnography. Midwifery. 2013; 29:(6)674-681 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.008

Dingwall R, Hoffman LM, Staniland K Introduction: why a sociology of pandemics?. Sociol Health Illn. 2013; 35:(2)167-173 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12019

Farrow A Lactation support and the LGBTQI community. J Hum Lact. 2014; 31:(1)26-28 https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334414554928

Gamble J, Creedy DK A counselling model for postpartum women after distressing birth experiences. Midwifery. 2009; 25:(2)e21-e30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.04.004

Hayden M It felt like my birth trauma had been forgotten. BMJ. 2022; 377 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1006

Another baby?. 2004. http://www.birthtraumaassociation.org.uk/publications/SubBirth.pdf (accessed 11 August 2022)

Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M Support for mothers and their families after life-threatening illness in pregnancy and childbirth: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2015; 65:(638)e563-e569 https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X686461

Greenfield MHull, UK: University of Hull; 2017

Juntereal NA, Spatz DL Same-sex mothers and lactation. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2019; 44:(3)164-169 https://doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0000000000000519

NHS England. 2021. https://www.england.nhs.uk/2021/04/dedicated-mh-services/ (accessed 9 August 2022)

Pregnant Then Screwed. 2020. https://pregnantthenscrewed.com/letter-to-simon-stevens/ (accessed 9 August 2022)

Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS CARE explanation and elaborations: reporting guidelines for case reports. J Clin Epidemiology. 2017; 89:218-235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026

Röndahl G, Bruhner E, Lindhe J Heteronormative communication with lesbian families in antenatal care, childbirth and postnatal care. J Adv Nurs. 2009; 65:(11)2337-2344 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05092.x

Spidsberg BD Vulnerable and strong – lesbian women encountering maternity care. J Adv Nurs. 2007; 60:(5)478-486 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04439.x

Zauderer CR PTSD after childbirth: early detection and treatment. J Nurse Pract. 2014; 39:(3)36-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000425827.90435.e1

Lack of policy consideration for breastfeeding co-mothers in maternity services

02 September 2022
9 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 9

Abstract

This article reports on two cases of lesbian non-gestational mothers whose breastfeeding intentions were disrupted by the postnatal ward visitor restrictions imposed by NHS trusts during the COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK. One case came to the attention of the author as part of a wider study using an online survey to examine experiences of birth during the first COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020. In the second case, the author was approached by the non-gestational mother for support in her capacity as a doula in April 2021. In both cases, the non-gestational mothers intended to breastfeed their babies and had taken steps to ensure they were lactating, but the heterosexist restrictions for partners in the early postnatal period created complications that impacted their breastfeeding intentions. In the second case, perinatal mental health care for previous birth trauma was also potentially indicated. Both non-gestational mothers also reported that they were not receiving antenatal support to overcome these difficulties, as they were mothers-to-be who were not pregnant.

Perinatal services are organised around the assumption that there will be one pregnant parent, who is a woman, and that the other parent will be a man, who lives with the woman, and is the father of the baby (Spidsberg, 2007). These heteronormative assumptions can cause difficulties for all families who fall outside of this model, including single women, pregnant trans men and non-binary people, and pregnant women whose partner is also a woman. The literature shows that pregnant women of a minority sexuality using perinatal services face both direct and indirect homophobia (Dahl et al, 2013). Indirect homophobia can include inappropriate forms that only refer to one father and one mother (Röndahl et al, 2009). Direct homophobia can include everything from refusing assisted conception services to lesbians (Spidsberg, 2007), to physically rough vaginal examinations while in labour (Spidsberg, 2007). Among women of a minority sexuality, co-mothers may also be affected by heterosexism and homophobia. The literature shows that similarly to sexual minority birth mothers, they may face exclusion either because organisational structures are heterocentric or because of professional incompetence and homophobic attitudes from perinatal healthcare providers (Cherguit et al, 2013). Pandemics reinforce existing inequities within societies (Dingwall et al, 2013). This case report demonstrates how the pandemic reinforced inequality for co-mothers in perinatal care.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month