Interprofessional education guidelines. 2017. (accessed 19 October 2021)

Biggs J. From theory to practice: a cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development. 1993; 12:73-85

Bozkurt A, Sharma R. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 2020; 15:(1)1-5

Branch RM, Dousy TA. Survey of instructional design models.Bloomington, CA: Association for Educational Communications and Technology; 2015

Bromage A, Clouder L, Thistlethwaite J, Gordon F. Interprofessional e-learning and collaborative work: Practices and technologies.Hershey PA: Information Science Reference; 2010

Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education. Interprofessional education – a definition. 2002. (accessed 1 September 2021)

Dearnley C, Owens M, Greasley P, Plew C. Mixing Students Mixing Methods. In: Bromage A, Clouder L, Thislethwaite J, Gordon F (Eds). Hershey PA: Information Science Reference; 2010

Edelbring S. A threefold framework for relating to innovations and technology in education: learning from, with and about technology. In: Bromage A, Clouder L, Thistlethwaite J, Gordon F (eds). Hershey PA: Information Science Reference; 2010

Ferri F, Grifoni P, Guzzo T. Online learning and emergency remote teaching: opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies. 2020; 10:(4)

Freeth D, Reeves S. Learning to work together: using the presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities. J Interprof Care. 2004; 18:(1)43-56 Coronavirus (COVID-19). 2020. (accessed 3 August 2020)

Hean S, Green C, Anderson E The contribution of theory to the design, delivery, and evaluation of interprofessional curricula: BEME Guide No. 49. Medical Teacher. 2018; 40:(6)542-558

The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. 2020. (accessed 29 June 2021)

Hutchings M, Quinney A. The flipped classroom, disruptive pedagogies, enabling technologies and wicked problems: responding to ‘the bomb in the basement’. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2015; 13:(2)105-118

Langlois S, Xyrichis A, Daulton B The COVID-19 crisis silver lining interprofessional education to guide future innovation. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020; 34:(5)587-592

Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Baki M. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record. 2013; 115:(3)1-47

Moore MG. Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. The Journal of Higher Education. 1973; 44:(9)671-679

Moore MG. Editorial: Distance education theory. American Journal of Distance Education. 1991; 5:(3)1-6

Online learning and teaching during the pandemic. 2020. (accessed 25 October 2021)

Realising professionalism: Standards for education and training. Part 1: Standards framework for nursing and midwifery education.London: Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2018

Standards of proficiency for midwives.London: Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2019

Emergency standards for nursing and midwifery education.London: Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2020

Power A. The start of an academic year like no other. British Journal of Midwifery. 2020; 28:(10)

Rabe A, Sy M, Cheung W, Lucero-Prisno D. COVID-19 and health professions education: A 360° view of the impact of a global health emergency. MedEdPublish. 2020; 9:(1)

Remote learning guidance from state education agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: a first look. 2020. (accessed 25 October 2021)

Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations.New York: Simon and Schuster; 2003

Sangrà A, Vlachopoulos D, Cabrera N. Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2012; 13:(2)145-159

Ucisa. The VLE landscape. 2019. (accessed 18 August 2021)

World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. 2020. (accessed 5 August 2020)

Learning in lockdown: exploring the impact of COVID-19 on interprofessional education

02 November 2021
9 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 11


The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the learning experiences of students undertaking health and social care programmes across the globe. In the UK, the Nursing and Midwifery Council introduced emergency standards for undergraduate programmes in 2020, making significant short-term changes to programme delivery. However, the mandate for all students to undertake interprofessional education remained. Interprofessional education is key to preparing students on health and social care programmes, as it enables students to work as effective members of multi-agency/multi-professional teams on qualification. It is an important element of training, as it has a direct impact on quality of care and service user experience.

This series of articles will explore the experiences of ‘lockdown learning’ from the perspective of academics, students and service users from a global perspective in relation to the delivery of interprofessional education during the pandemic, which necessitated a wholesale move from face-to-face, blended and online learning to include emergency remote teaching. The series was written by members of the Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education Research Subgroup (Interprofessional Education Experiences) and aims to identify barriers and facilitators to successful shared learning and provide suggestions for how lessons learned can be taken forward to further enhance this important element of pre-registration education. The perceptions and attitudes of academics and students on such comprehensive changes are a unique and rich data source to explore and inform future provision.

The World Health Organization (WHO, 2020) declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic in March 2020. In response to the highly contagious nature of the virus, the UK government put in place stringent measures to slow down its spread, including social distancing (, 2020). Social distancing had a significant impact on all higher education institutions as campuses were closed and face-to-face teaching was replaced with emergency remote teaching (Power, 2020). Emergency remote teaching is defined as ‘a temporary shift of instructional delivery to an alternate delivery mode due to crisis circumstances’ (Bozkurt and Sharma, 2020; Hodges et al, 2020). Consequently, the implementation of interprofessional education programmes globally had to move from face-to-face or blended learning to emergency remote teaching. This introductory article aims to give historical context to interprofessional education provision and provide an overview of the contextualised experiences of academics and learners on interprofessional education development, delivery, and evaluation during the liminal period brought about by the pandemic.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month